Society's ChildS


Attention

Germany detains patriots over remigration summit

Constantin von Hoffmeister
Eurosiberia.net
Fri, 16 May 2025 18:26 UTC
Banned from flying, bound to report daily — eight Germans punished for thinking dangerously in the age of managed decline.
Flying Ban
© Eurosiberia.net
At the gate of departure, the regime tightens its grip. Not some distant land of sand and rifles — Germany, that hollow hall of bureaucracy and buried völkisch memory, now eats its own like Kronos gorging on the gold-eyed children of the future empire. Six German men and two German women, citizens still on paper, rose to leave their homeland for a congress of European minds, the so-called "Remigration Summit" in Italy, a gathering meant to discuss the restoration of harmony between land and lineage. Before the metal birds could lift, before passports opened and boots stepped into Mediterranean light, the German authorities blocked them — detained them — seized their liberty not in some dusky alley of dictatorship but in gleaming chrome airports supposedly belonging to a self-proclaimed "democratic" state. No charges. No threats issued. No crimes committed. The reason given? A shapeless fog: "They might damage Germany's international reputation." As if truth spoken abroad could hurt a country more than nonsense propagated at home.

These patriots were interrogated for hours. Then they were branded with the mark of the controlled: forbidden from exiting their own territory for two days. No verdict from a court, no jury of peers, just a fiat from faceless men who enforce the dogmas of Brussels and kneel before the unrooted idols of global management. And each day, now, the eight German patriots must march to a police station and check in like paroled felons — show their faces to a machine that fears what those faces represent. Ancestral strength. Continuity. A different vision of Europe — vertical, mythic, anti-fragile. The regime trembles not before weapons but before sentences, before assemblies of the faithful, before intellectuals who dare to remember. These men were not heading to riot, loot, burn, rape, or smash. They carried books, thoughts, convictions. That is the crime: defiance of collapse.
Read More...
Propaganda

A third of Americans are concerned about manipulated news

Tyler Durden
ZeroHedge
Thu, 15 May 2025 18:19 UTC
manipulation media fake news disinformation
Almost half of the people surveyed in the United States as part of a Statista Consumer Insights survey actively try to keep up to date with world events and politics.

However, as Statista's Katharina Buchholz reports, about a third of survey participants also fear that news in the so-called mainstream media is being manipulated.

Americans' trust in the media is therefore under pressure.
Read More...
Microphone

Ex-UK Special Forces break silence on 'war crimes' by colleagues

Hannah O'Grady, Joel Gunter
BBC
Mon, 12 May 2025 00:00 UTC
Prisoners
© theghanareport.comHow members of one squadron kept count of their kills
Former members of UK Special Forces have broken years of silence to give BBC Panorama eyewitness accounts of alleged war crimes committed by colleagues in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Giving their accounts publicly for the first time, the veterans described seeing members of the SAS murder unarmed people in their sleep and execute handcuffed detainees, including children.

One veteran who served with the SAS in Afghanistan, recalled:
"They handcuffed a young boy and shot him. He was clearly a child, not even close to fighting age."

Killing of detainees "became routine", the veteran said. "They'd search someone, handcuff them, then shoot them", before cutting off the plastic handcuffs used to restrain people and "planting a pistol" by the body, he said.

The new testimony includes allegations of war crimes stretching over more than a decade, far longer than the three years currently being examined by a judge-led public inquiry in the UK.

The SBS, the Royal Navy's elite special forces regiment, is also implicated for the first time in the most serious allegations - executions of unarmed and wounded people.

Comment: Offered is a disturbing, but informative read. According to this article, killing of innocents is standard psychopathic military procedure.

Read More...
Arrow Down

Junk study says if men didn't eat so much red meat we'd have nicer weather

Jo Nova
joannenova.com.au
Thu, 15 May 2025 08:01 UTC
Gorilla Grilling Meat
© Image by Ivana Tomášková from Pixabay
They really do want to turn men into women

The men are the climate vandals who carelessly wreck the Earth. If they would just eat the tofu and drive less, the world would be a better place, eh, especially for bourgeois academic femmebots in London. This is the kind of junk research that Big Government funding feeds. Someone spent a lot of money, and nobody learnt a thing.

Naturally, the Guardian lapped it right up:
Car use and meat consumption drive emissions gender gap, research suggests

The Guardian

Cars and meat are major factors driving a gender gap in greenhouse gas emissions, new research suggests.

Men emit 26% more planet-heating pollution than women from transport and food, according to a preprint study of 15,000 people in France. The gap shrinks to 18% after controlling for socioeconomic factors such as income and education.
But really the 26%-more-planet-polluting-men shrinks to a third once you account for men being, you know, bigger and more likely to travel further.
Eating red meat and driving cars explain almost all of the 6.5-9.5% difference in pollution that remains after also accounting for men eating more calories and travelling longer distances, the researchers said. They found no gender gap from flying.
The enemy of course, is "traditional gender norms". Real men cause storms and floods. Toxic masculinity is raising Earths Temperature:
Our results suggest that traditional gender norms, particularly those linking masculinity with red meat consumption and car use, play a significant role in shaping individual carbon footprints," said Ondine Berland, an economist at the London School of Economics and Political Science and a co-author of the study.
From the paper, these genius economists think red meat consumption is just a male identity thing:
"Red meat and car — high-emission goods often associated with male identity — account for most of the residual, highlighting the role of gender differences in preferences in shaping disparities in carbon footprints."
Read More...
Light Sabers

Is Britain on the brink of civil war?

Joe Baron
The Daily Sceptic
Mon, 12 May 2025 01:00 UTC
street riot
© UnknownRiot in Southport, Britain
According to David Betz, Professor of War in the Modern World at King's College London, many of the preconditions for civil war exist in Britain today. Using academic studies on social cohesion, civil war causation theory and social attitudes surveys, he argues that the following preconditions are in place: elite overreach, factional polarisation, a collapse in trust, economic pressures, and the perceived downgrading of the majority population in a previously homogeneous society are all present in contemporary Britain.

The current dynamics, he continues, point to an emerging conflict between radicalised factions within the Muslim community and an incipient nativist white nationalism. Professor Betz goes on to claim - using the Maoist model that divides insurgencies into three phases - that the nativists are in phase one, the so-called defensive phase in which the group begins to organise, disseminate propaganda and build a conscious community of followers.

Islamists, on the other hand, are in phase two - when violent attacks occur on a semi-regular basis, a military structure is being developed, but they are not yet strong enough to challenge the state's monopoly on violence. (Professor Betz believes that, due to the absence of clear geographic divisions between the antagonists, Britain is unlikely to reach phase three - the offensive phase. This is when the insurgent groups are strong enough to challenge government forces.)

It is an arresting and troubling thesis. It is also convincing. The preconditions outlined above undeniably exist in modern Britain.

Comment: Unfazed was yesterday. Too late is today.

Read More...
Arrow Down

The decivilizing of America

Victor David Hanson
American Greatness
Mon, 12 May 2025 00:00 UTC
People images
© Getty ImagesThe reflections of people
From secure borders to functioning cities, America is shedding the hard-won pillars of civilization — by choice, not chance — in a sweeping, top-down descent into disorder.

Secure borders and stationary populations were considered the mark of emerging civilization by classical historians. In contrast to nomadism and constant strife over disputed territory, peoples who had clearly defined and protected borders ascended to statehood, maintained a distinct culture, and achieved greater prosperity and security.

In contrast, what we suffered from 2021 to 2025 was unprecedented. It was an intentional administration effort to de-civilize the nation by destroying its borders — as if to return to the premodern era, when there were no clearly defined or secure borders, and nomadic peoples migrated as they pleased.

Stranger still, illegal aliens were at times given precedence over citizens — as immigration law was simply discarded. Without IDs, illegal aliens boarded U.S. flights, while the government ordered citizens to obtain more secure "real" IDs.

Some 8,500 veteran soldiers were drummed out of the military for refusing the experimental mRNA vaccinations. Yet 10 million simply walked across the southern border into America, without a care from the Biden administration whether they were vaccinated, ill, or had criminal records.

Comment: At the end of the day, we are neither what we thought we were nor what we had hoped to be...nor able to be again. But we could try.

Read More...
Cult

Best of the Web: The Manipulators' Playbook

Gigi Foster
The Brownstone Institute
Tue, 13 May 2025 15:14 UTC
greek column brownstone institute
Here is the text of my TedX talk in Australia, October 2024, which the sponsor refused to post

Every four years, when I was growing up in the US, my mother and father would go to the polling booths and cancel each other out. They'd come home and say as much, with a smirk. Then they'd clink their glasses and have "cocktail hour" together, and enjoy the end of another day of married life in each other's arms.

Mom was a lifelong Democrat and Dad a lifelong Republican. Back then, people firmly positioned on opposing sides of politics could talk to one another - and even, apparently, marry each other and produce kids! Do you think that is common today? The "cancellation" my parents joked about 30 years ago has, today, become no laughing matter.
Read More...
Snakes in Suits

Ivy League school threatens conservative student paper behind mini-DOGE: 'Pure retaliation'

Greg Piper
Just the News
Tue, 13 May 2025 21:43 UTC
Alex Sheih doge brown university
© USA TodayAlex Shieh lit the internet on fire in early April 2025, after asking Brown University's small army of non-instructional staff to justify their jobs.
Brown Spectator publisher Alex Shieh made an ad against the university and is paying out of his own pocket to broadcast it in Rhode Island. "Late-breaking" trademark charge called "smokescreen" to punish expression.

The Rhode Island House accused the Brown Daily Herald of communism and treason for its editorial campaign encouraging pacifism during World War II, but unlike its new conservative-libertarian rival, the Herald has apparently never been accused of infringing the trademark of the Ivy League school it covers.

Like the Herald, the Brown Spectator is a nonprofit financially independent of the university, but only the latter's leaders face discipline for putting the word "Brown" in its name.

Brown University expanded its trademark infringement charge beyond Spectator publisher Alex Shieh, who got in trouble for creating the Bloat@Brown database of diversity, equity and inclusion jobs but whose charges keep mutating like a "potentially" engineered virus.

Comment: How the whole mess kicked off. Brown must have a lot to hide/lose:

DIY DOGE: Student used AI to email 3,800 Ivy League bureaucrats "What, exactly, do you do?", now under investigation by Brown University

Read More...
Eye 1

Google's largest-ever acquisition of an Israeli software company reveals Big Tech's complicity in genocide

Refaat Ibrahim
Mondoweiss
Sat, 10 May 2025 20:29 UTC
google wiz surveillance israel unit 8200
Wiz, valued at $12 billion, provides cloud-based cybersecurity services with AI technology.
Google's acquisition of Israeli software company, Wiz, for $32 billion shows just how much Silicon Valley is invested in Israeli tech. The problem is, almost all of Israeli tech is first developed by a genocidal army.

At a time when global concern is mounting over the crimes committed against civilians in Gaza, and calls are increasing to halt the genocide being carried out by Israel, recent news reveals a more dangerous role played by giant tech companies in fueling the Israeli war machine. In July 2024, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, announced the completion of its acquisition of the Israeli company Wiz for an unprecedented amount — $32 billion in cash. The move was described as the largest acquisition in Google's history.

But this deal goes beyond being merely a business investment; it reveals the depth of moral and technical involvement Silicon Valley companies have in supporting the economy of the Israeli occupation, and even in financing its military and intelligence arms.

Comment:

Read More...
Bizarro Earth

National Park Service sued for choosing wealthy 'environmentalists' over small sustainable farms

Roderick Law
The Federalist
Wed, 07 May 2025 21:55 UTC
elk point reyes california
© Frank Schulenburg/Wikimedia / CC BY-SA 4.0Female Tule elk at Tomales Point, Point Reyes National Seashore, Marin County, California.
Congress has opened an investigation into a settlement between NPS and environmental groups that booted ranchers from California land.

In April, the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources opened an investigation into the National Park Service (NPS) bureaucrats who worked with radical environmental groups to drive ranchers and farmers out of Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS) in northern California.

The Nature Conservancy and other wealthy environmental groups have a clear history of preferring pristine wilderness to people and pressuring government to forsake accommodations for humans. The NPS, whether for conflict avoidance or ideological sympathy, then acquiesces and lends the veneer of a legitimate process.

The PRNS, created in 1962, includes about 21,000 acres privately ranched via lease agreements. Fourteen ranches and dairy farms produce organic meat and dairy products, many of them suppliers for blue cheese makers, the Straus Family Creamery, farmers markets, and more businesses local to Marin County. The farmers have a keen interest in protecting the land because it is so integral to their way of life, jobs, and the local economy. As Straus Creamery founder Albert Straus wrote, "The farms and ranches on the preserve are not industrial-scale; they are small, deeply rooted, family-run operations." Straus and his suppliers have engaged in environmentally friendly farming.

Comment: The Daily Muck did a deep-dive on another EPA and California overreach in Point Reyes:
Eco-Tyranny in California: Land Seized and Owner Arrested Amid Delta Smelt Scandal

Jan 23, 2025

The dramatic auction of Point Buckler Island, located in the Delta-Bay, has ignited a fierce debate over environmental integrity, property rights, and governmental authority. John D. Sweeney, the former owner, was arrested minutes after the island sold for $3.8 million, raising serious questions about the legality and fairness of the proceedings.

This story matters because it highlights potential corruption, the clash between state and federal environmental policies, and the ongoing struggle to balance human needs with ecological preservation.

A Decade-Long Battle Ends in Controversy

Point Buckler Island, a 50-acre marshland in Suisun Marsh, San Francisco Bay, has been the center of a decade-long legal and environmental dispute. Purchased by John Sweeney in 2011 for $150,000, the island was transformed into an exclusive kiteboarding club for Silicon Valley elites.

However, unauthorized construction and water diversions led to hefty fines from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board), the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

For a comprehensive overview of the fraudulent restoration efforts that set the stage for this conflict, refer to our first article in this series: Fake Restorations Killed California's Delta Smelt.

The Flawed Auction: Five Critical Errors

The January 2025 auction, held on the steps of the Solano County Courthouse in Fairfield, resulted in the sale of Point Buckler Island to the John Muir Land Trust (JMLT) for $3.8 million. Sweeney contends that the auction was marred by significant procedural errors, rendering the sale invalid:
  1. Lack of Proof of Personal Service
    • Issue: No evidence was provided that auction notices were personally served to Sweeney or his associate, Jennifer Frost.
    • Impact: Without proper notice, Sweeney was deprived of the opportunity to contest the sale or prepare a defense, violating due process rights.
  2. Violation of Levy Timing Requirements
    • Issue: The writ to sell was issued in November 2023, allowing a 180-day period for the sale. However, the auction occurred in December 2024, exceeding the legal timeframe.
    • Impact: This breach of the mandated waiting period questions the legitimacy of the writ and the timing of the auction.
  3. Failure to Conduct a Fair Market Value Appraisal
    • Issue: The state bypassed a fair market appraisal and excluded other bidders, favoring JMLT.
    • Impact: This exclusion suggests favoritism and undermines the auction's integrity, effectively stealing public property.
  4. Unlawful Assignment and Sale Procedures
    • Issue: Eileen White of the Water Board secretly sold the $3.8 million judgment to JMLT without proper court oversight.
    • Impact: The lack of transparency and proper procedure invalidates the sale, as JMLT did not follow required legal steps for a levy sale.
  5. Improper Auction Terms Announcement
    • Issue: Terms were disclosed only seven days before the auction, imposing a one-year redemption period conflicting with the judgment assignment.
    • Impact: Late disclosure of terms and conflicting conditions render the auction unlawful and further support claims of procedural misconduct.
John Sweeney's Stand: Accusations of Fraud and Overreach

Sweeney vehemently disputes the legitimacy of the writ and the auction process. "Levy Writs must be sold 180 days after signing by the judge/sheriff. John Muir did not pay $3.8 million; they gave it to John Muir Land Trust. That's the story." he asserted. He further contends, "Judgment was not Water Board's after Nov 25. They sold it so the Water Board can't force a sheriff sale. John Muir needed a court-ordered new levy sale run by them, not Eileen White."

Sweeney accuses Eileen White, the executive officer for the Water Board, of defrauding the public by mismanaging funds and orchestrating a biased sale process. He claims that White has wasted $25 million in Attorney General legal fees to cover up her actions and has banned him and his company from hiring lawyers or public defenders since 2022, effectively silencing his defense.
Read the rest here. It's shameful.


A lawyer representing the farm workers explains the history of the Point Reyes controversy:




Read More...