• New arrest warrant issued for ex-Pakistani PM Khan
• My would-be assassins are still in office - former Pakistani PM
• Pakistani police file terrorism charges against ex-PM Khan
• US blackmailed Pakistan into regime change - former PM

• Devon Archer testimony: Hunter used Joe Biden as 'defensive leverage' for foreign biz partners
• Evidence of Joe and Hunter Biden's Burisma corruption is overwhelming
• Devon Archer: Hunter Biden, Burisma execs 'called DC' to get Ukrainian prosecutor fired
• The Biden 'Brand': Devon Archer details the 'niceties' of influence-peddling
• Ex-Hunter Biden partner Devon Archer testifies Joe Biden was on calls with foreign patrons 'for the brand'

Special Counsel Jack Smith on Friday asked a judge to issue a protective order in the case against former President Donald Trump over his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election after Trump made a post on Truth Social.

On Friday, Trump posted the following message to his Truth Social account: "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I'M COMING AFTER YOU."

Now, Smith is using that post to argue Trump's access to the discovery in his criminal case should be restricted. Smith's proposed order seeks to prevent "improper dissemination or use of discovery materials, including to the public," according to a four-page filing.

"Such a restriction is particularly important in this case because the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him," Smith argued before referencing Trump's Truth Social post. "And in recent days, regarding this case, the defendant has issued multiple posts either specifically or by implication including the following, which the defendant posted just hours ago."

"If the defendant were to begin issuing public posts using details or, for example, grand jury transcripts obtained in discovery here, it could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case," Smith argued.

A Trump spokesperson defended the Truth Social post as "political speech" and denied it was in reference to the criminal case.

"The Truth post cited is the definition of political speech, and was in response to the RINO, China-loving, dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs, like the ones funded by the Koch brothers and the Club for No Growth," the spokesperson said.

Former President Donald Trump joked Friday that he would win the 2024 election if he was hit with "one more indictment" during a speech before a dinner held by the Alabama Republican Party.

Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges during his Thursday arraignment after Special Counsel Jack Smith secured a four-count indictment of Trump relating to his efforts to contest the results of the 2020 election after Smith previously secured a 37-count indictment against Trump in June based on an investigation into allegations surrounding classified documents.

"They wanted to wait, and they did wait," Trump said. "They waited right to the middle of an election and they waited until I became the dominant force in the polls because we're dominating everybody, including Biden in the polls, and then they filed 'em all, every one of of all that essentially one time, including local DA's and AGs that even other cases right in the middle of the campaign, where we're leading by so much and that's not going to make any impact, because every time they file an indictment, we go way up in the polls. We need one more indictment to close out this election, one more indictment and this election is closed out. Nobody has even a chance."

...

Legal experts noted that much of the conduct Smith claimed was criminal in the indictment appeared to be protected by the First Amendment. Harvard University law professor Alan Dershowitz said that the indictment not only attacked the First Amendment, but also Trump's Sixth Amendment right to counsel.