[Editor's Note: This article describes a dynamic we have covered before: After the US suffered its major setbacks with Crimea's secession and the Novorossiya uprisings, they needed the EU and Russia to help re-manage part of the situation. So much for 'F*ck the EU', and Nuland's attempt to alienate other interested parties. Poroshenko was an optimal compromise candidate; he was someone that the Three Powers involved could more or less live with. The US and Russia both have mechanisms at their disposal to push Poroshenko in various, often contradictory, ways. This article helps to explain why the Russians saw Poroshenko as someone they could minimally work with - J. Flores]Experts: Part of the Russian governing class is closely connected with Poroshenko
A view of Russia's Kremlin
Visible manifestations of Russia's support for the Ukrainian economy and, as a result, the Kiev regime, are really there. But on the question of how much they are capable of significantly affecting the economic situation in Ukraine, experts' opinion diverge. Many political analysts, writers, and simply indifferent observers, blame the Russian government, convicting it of evil intent in their aspiration to maintain good relations with the West, by protecting the Kiev authorities who are waging war against the rebellious Donbass.
So by what ways and, above all, for what is Russia, albeit indirectly, contributing to the maintenance of the positions of the hostile powers of the puppet and criminal Ukrainian "elite?"
Granting discounts on gas and electricity supplies at preferential pricesIn order to justify here the policy of "Gazprom," the argument can be made that, first of all, Ukraine is a transit territory for Russian natural gas, and attempts to establish an alternative path of transit have thus far been unsuccessful. The objective reality is such that, dependent on resource exports, Russia is compelled to make concessions. The second argument is a concern for the "brother Ukrainian people" which, of course, it is impossible to regain due to the unhealthy actions of the leadership of Ukraine.
But, given that the bills for the population as a result of Russian discounts in Ukraine do not at all decrease, and social policies are not gravitating to be wider encompassing, this argument also appears unconvincing. Moreover, experts notice that discounts on gas are one of the most important areas of unofficial support for Kiev from Russia's side.
In the case of electricity, it's also possible to reference the dependent status of Crimea on Ukraine on this question. The peninsula is currently 70% dependent on Ukrainian electricity. In the words of the Minister of fuel and Energy of Crimea, Sergei Egorov, the peninsula could independently provide for basic energy needs by 2018, when private energy generation will reach 950 MW per day.
Comment: Ponerization is well under way in Washington's Ukrainian laboratory. Also see: