© Sputnik/ Vladimir PirogovFreedom and democracy is a warm gun.
America doesn't "win" its wars, because winning a war is
secondary to other goals in our war making. Winning or losing has little immediate consequence for the United States, because the wars we start,
Wars of Choice, are
not of vital national interest; losing doesn't mean getting invaded or our cities being destroyed. The following are some of the interests Washington has in
not winning, reasons for our unending wars.
1)
War sustains the (very) profitable log-rolling contracts for supplies in key congressional districts, grants for university faculties to study strategy, new funding for new weapons. During wartime who dares question almost any Pentagon cost "to defend America?"
2)
Continued conflict postpones hard decisions about cutting defense spending such as
closing surplus bases, cutting duplicate systems, and focusing on waste. See
16 Ways to Cut Defense. Shakespeare put it well, advising a king to have lots of foreign wars in order to have tranquility at home.
3)
Starting wars is the historic way for kings (and presidents) to gain popularity and avoid doing tough domestic reforms for problems that cry out for solutions.
War lets them be postponed. Think of George W. Bush winning election on promises to balance the budget, have health care reform, reform our bankrupt social security commitments, tackle the EPA, take on the teachers' unions, rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, and such.
Instead, with war, all those issues were swept aside. He won his re-election by having even bigger deficit warfare/welfare spending and increasing the national debt by trillions.
Comment: Wonder what US has up its sleeve?