OF THE
TIMES
Earlier in negotiations, the party rejected an amendment from [James] Zogby that would have called on an end to Israel's "occupation and illegal settlements" in Palestine, according to the Associated Press. That fight symbolizes a clear divide between Sanders and Clinton, who is generally viewed as much more pro-Israel.Here's that draft as of July 1. Notice how supportive it is of Israel. Not a word of criticism. Jerusalem is the capital forever. And Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) is wicked - and anti-democratic.
A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel's right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.
We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel's future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

" ... for evidence of abuse and torture by British soldiers but have already ruled out putting Tony Blair on trial for war crimes ..." (1)Whilst the Report is "expected to strongly criticize" Blair's role in the illegal invasion:
"It means individual soldiers could be prosecuted for war crimes but not Mr. Blair."This, in spite of the fact that it is now confirmed that Blair's commitment to George W. Bush's determination to invade Iraq was made personally, a year before the assault, at a meeting at Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, without the knowledge of Parliament. The ICC however, whilst considering the introduction of a crime of aggression, thus bringing illegal invasions in to their legal remit - to which Bush and Blair's actions would seemingly be relevant - would "not apply retrospectively."
"decision by the UK to go to war in Iraq falls outside the Court's jurisdiction."Whilst any British or US soldier responsible for the litany of appalling crimes committed in Iraq should be pursued relentlessly - which has broadly been less than the case to date - the ultimate responsibility for the whole tragic disaster for which both countries' leaders and military brass will surely be haunted throughout history, lies with those at the political top. Their blatant mistruths led to the invasion and its bloody, inhuman, ignorant, culturally clueless, unending aftermath. Of the ICC decision, Reg Keys, who stood against Blair in the 2005 election and whose twenty year old son, Tom was killed in Iraq said: "It makes me very angry. They don't call him Teflon Tony for nothing."

Comment: As we wrote in our coverage on Erdogan's apology (see here and here), it's time for Turkey to put up or shut up, and so far, they have made a big show of actually changing their disastrous policies on Syria. Foreign Minister Cavusoglu said today that Turkey will "cooperate with everyone who fights Daesh", adding: "we opened Incirlik air base for those who want to join the active fight against Daesh. Why not cooperate with Russia in the same manner? Turkey is ready for such cooperation. Terrorism is our common enemy. Joint efforts are important to avoid negative incidents [among sides fighting ISIS]" While many interpreted that as meaning that Turkey was opening the base for use by Russians, Cavusoglu clarified, saying that isn't what he said.