Puppet MastersS


Piggy Bank

The Winners-Take-All Reign of Emmanuel Macron - All Power to the Banks!

Macron elected

A ghost of the past was the real winner of the French presidential election. Emmanuel Macron won only because a majority felt they had to vote against the ghost of "fascism" allegedly embodied by his opponent, Marine Le Pen. Whether out of panic or out of the need to feel respectable, the French voted two to one in favor of a man whose program most of them either ignored or disliked. Now they are stuck with him for five years.



Comment: Given all the reported voting irregularities it's a sure bet that he didn't win the election at the margins stated - if at all.


If people had voted on the issues, the majority would never have elected a man representing the trans-Atlantic elite totally committed to "globalization", using whatever is left of the power of national governments to weaken them still further, turning over decision-making to "the markets" - that is, to international capital, managed by the major banks and financial institutions, notably those located in the United States, such as Goldman-Sachs.

The significance of this election is so widely misrepresented that clarification requires a fairly thorough explanation, not only of the Macron project, but also of what the (impossible) election of Marine Le Pen would have meant.

Info

More to Theresa's snap election than meets the eye: The people versus the press

Theresa May
With North Korea and the US dragging the world towards nuclear cataclysm, it seemed no other story could emerge to top the goings-on on the Korean Peninsula. Then British Prime Minister Theresa May called an early snap election, saying she wants to "strengthen her hand" on Brexit by removing opposition in the UK parliament.

On paper, there is hardly an issue here. Polls have consistently shown that May's Conservatives would win such an election comfortably. The opposition Labour Party has made little impact since Jeremy Corbyn survived a leadership challenge, and the only other UK-wide parties, who could theoretically gain enough seats to take power, are the Liberal Democrats (who presently have a mere nine seats out of 650), the Greens (one) and UKIP (none at all, their only elected MP having defected back to the Conservatives).

Snakes in Suits

The generals on Syria and Iraq: Talking tactics, lacking strategy

Brett McGurk, Jim Mattis, and Joseph Dunford
© DOD photo by Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith Defense Sec. Jim Mattis, center, details the first revised ISIS War plan of the Trump administration, with Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford, and Special Envoy Brett McGurk, at the Pentagon, Fri., May 18, 2017.
On Friday Secretary of Defense [General ret.] Mattis, General Dunford and Special Envoy McGurk on the Campaign to Defeat ISIS held a press briefing. A transcript is available.

My first thought after reading its was: "These people live in a different world. They have no idea how the real word works on the ground. What real people think, say, and are likely to do." There was no strategic thought visible. Presented were only some misguided tactical ideas.

One purpose of the briefing was obviously to souse the Saudis in preparation of Trumps weapons sales campaign there. There was no mention at all of any (Saudi financed) Jihadis in Syria or elsewhere besides ISIS. Questions about Kurdish or Iraqi paramilitary groups were answered with trash talk about Iran.

Sheeple

Dunning-Kruger: Comey effectively admits Trump did not obstruct justice

comey and trump
CNN story shows that former FBI Director Comey can point to no action by President Trump that could constitute interference in the conduct of the Russiagate inquiry.

CNN has published a rather odd report in which it says that former FBI Director Comey "now believes" that Donald Trump tried to influence the Russiagate inquiry, but that he clearly does not think this amounted to an obstruction of justice
Former FBI Director James Comey now believes that President Donald Trump was trying to influence his judgment about the Russia probe, a person familiar with his thinking says, but whether that influence amounts to obstruction of justice remains an open question. (bold italics added)
"You have to have intent in order to obstruct justice in the criminal sense," the source said, adding that "intent is hard to prove."

Comment: This whole thing just sounds like Comey is desperately trying to remain relevant. Dunning-Kruger anyone? See more:


Green Light

Has the Trump administration green-lighted 'regime change' in Venezuela?

Venezuela Flag
© geopolitico.es
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley said that the Trump administration "wants to prevent another conflict like Syria, North Korea or South Sudan" in Venezuela which is a code phrase for "regime change." According to a May 17th report by the Associated Press (AP):
Haley said the U.S. intention wasn't to be "intrusive" or "heavy-handed" but to support regional efforts to find a political solution and "show respect for the Venezuelan people" who want free and fair elections, the release of political prisoners and the worsening humanitarian situation addressed.

"We think if that doesn't happen we will certainly be hearing this in the Security Council because it will be a real problem — not just in the region but internationally," Haley told reporters after the closed-door briefing and discussions that lasted over 1½ hours.
Venezuelan Ambassador Rafael Ramirez accused Washington of trying "to interfere in our domestic issues." The AP report says that the "demonstrations have escalated into a vehicle for airing grievances against the government for triple-digit inflation, food shortages and a rise in crime." What the AP forgot to mention was the fact that as early as 2014, Saudi Arabia flooded the markets with cheap oil, which at one point was at $110 per barrel. Saudi Arabia coordinated the move with approval from Washington and to a point, Tel Aviv to drive down oil prices which would affect Venezuela domestically thus opening the door to violent protests against the Maduro government. Washington knew that Venezuela's economy that provides social programs is mainly based on oil exports.

Comment: With the US it is either "textbook" or "theme and variation." No matter, the uprooting of Venezuela is well underway and has been for years. Even if Trump wants to stop it, the forces are in motion.


Propaganda

CNN reports Comey changes his mind, believes Trump tried to influence him - how convenient

Jamescomey
© Newstarget.comMulder says "The truth is out there..." I'll go look.
Clearly disappointed to have been left out of the headline heroics from Friday night (courtesy of The Washington Post and The New York Times), CNN has decided that anon-sourced perspectives on officials' feelings now warrants reportage.

The latest in the sad sage of mainstream media's downward spiral, as The Hill reports, is that former FBI Director James Comey is expected to testify that he believes President Trump was deliberately trying to meddle in the FBI's investigation of Russian interference in the presidential election, according to a report late Friday.


Despite
swearing under oath that he "had never" been influenced during an investigation, and further that if he had he would have reported it immediately... CNN now reports that, according to a source, Comey has come to believe the president intended to influence him...

Comment: Remember this story is from CNN (Conveniently Not News) and cites no sources. In its own twisted way, its aim at Trump actually discredits Comey, but more importantly discredits itself.


Chess

Are there dots to connect between US bombing of Assad's troops and James Comey?

Trumpdotsbomb
© TheAntiMedia.org
On Thursday, US-led coalition forces launched an airstrike on Syrian pro-government troops near the town of al-Tanf in southern Syria claiming that they posed a threat to the US-backed forces. Fyodor Lukyanov, an expert in foreign affairs, analyzed how it might be connected with what is going on the US' domestic political arena.

On May 18, the US-led coalition struck pro-Assad fighters near the town of al-Tanf in the vicinity of an established safe zone protected by Russia. The US military later claimed that they posed a threat to US-backed forces in the country's south near the Jordan border.

This was the second time that Donald Trump administration has used military force directly against Damascus.On April 6, US Navy destroyers fired 59 cruise missiles at the Ash Sha'irat Airbase in western Syria, calling their attacks a "warning" to Damascus following a chemical weapons incident in Idlib province which Washington claimed was carried out by the Syrian government forces.

Comment: Any dot connections, based on fictitious news accounts from WaPo and NYT and/or subsequent speculation by distant observers, will have to wait. The water is muddy and MSM is stirring the pot.

As for the intimate connection between US domestic power dynamics and world events, this has always been the case. Think of like this: to the US elites, all the world's a stage on which their internal power dynamics are projected.


Padlock

Iran's new sanctions imposed on US-linked companies

Rouhani
© unknownPresident Rouhani
Iran has sanctioned nine US-linked companies in response to American sanctions over the Middle East country's ballistic missile program. While Iran's re-elected president Rouhani said the country was ready for dialogue, the US came up with prerequisites to start it.

Nine more US-linked businesses, organizations and individuals are put in the sanctions list, created in March. The new list of sanctions is dated May 18, with AP reporting that it was put online on Saturday.

The sanctions mean that Iran could seize local assets of the listed organizations and deny their employees entry to the country. The first batch of sanctions were announced back in March in response to actions of the Trump administration, which sanctioned more than two dozen Iran-linked people and companies in February in retaliation for a ballistic missile test.

Comment: Rouhani has just won his re-election. This means the ideologies of Iran and the US remain the same, and likely the arguments 'constant.'


Question

Despite abysmal women's rights record, Ivanka & Melania Trump praise Saudi Arabia's minimal progress

Ivanka Trump in Riyadh on May 20, 2017.
© Mandel Ngan / AFPIvanka Trump in Riyadh on May 20, 2017.
First Lady Melania Trump and the US president's daughter and adviser Ivanka Trump have praised Saudi Arabia for its "encouraging" progress with regards to women's rights.

Accompanying her father on his presidential trip to the Middle East, Ivanka met with a group of Saudi female leaders in Riyadh Sunday to discuss how women might gain further freedoms in the patriarchal state.

"In every country, including the United States, women and girls face challenges," Trump's eldest daughter told the group during a roundtable discussion led by Deputy President of the Women's Sports Authority Princess Reema bint Bander, according to AFP.

Comment: Trump sure seems eager to please the headchoppers-in-chief of Saudi Arabia. This is the status quo, the way things have been since FDR bought out the British-Saudi oil business in 1945. So we shouldn't be surprised. But we are. Because it's Trump. And he has done another 180. Now he flies direct from Riyadh to Israel (another first), which is also surprised by Trump's Saudi 180...


Airplane

Trump arrives in Riyadh as Saudi Arabia bankrupts itself

trump Saudi Arabia
© ABS-CBN NewsSaudi Arabia's King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud welcomes U.S. President Donald Trump during a reception ceremony in Riyadh.
US President Trump arrives in Saudi Arabia at a time when Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman - the country's de facto ruler - has launched it on a runaway spending programme which is bound to end in national bankruptcy.

US President Donald Trump's choice of Saudi Arabia for his first foreign trip has provoked some criticism. It is not difficult to understand why.

Whilst the US claims to be the leader of the "free world" the embarrassing reality is that its most important Middle East ally is a repressive autocratic Wahhabist monarchy. Whilst Donald Trump says the destruction of Jihadi terrorism is his priority, Saudi Arabia - as everyone knows - is the country that bankrolls most of this terrorism.

Comment: Opulence in the House of Saud, perhaps ending in a financial 'house of cards.' Will the 'good times' bankroll?