Puppet MastersS


Passport

Trump's executive order on immigration in conflict with federal policy, may face legal battle

immigration children
© AP Photo / Gregory Bull
US President Donald Trump's executive order to detain undocumented immigrant children for more than 20 days to avoid separating families may face a court struggle akin to the battle over the travel ban, Second Vice President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association Allen Orr told Sputnik.

"What President Trump did today was adopted policy that expressly violates a federal court holding. Therefore it is basically kicking the can to the judicial branch of government which had already reached the decision on the number of days the child can be confined," Orr said on Wednesday. "Much like the travel ban... [there will be] a fight in court."

The immigration lawyer was referring to Trump's bid to impose a travel ban on immigrants from five Muslim countries in addition to Venezuela and North Korea. The case has gone through a prolonged and fierce legal battle all the way up to the Supreme Court.

Bad Guys

Maduro announces national increase in minimum wage amid hyperinflation

Maduro
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro announced on Wednesday a 103% increase in the total minimum wage in the context of hyperinflation that afflicts the South American revolutionary country.

"From today, workers will receive a full 103% increase," Maduro told an event in Caracas to celebrate the first year of the Chamba Juvenil social program, which provides training and jobs for young people.

The minimum integral salary increased from 2,555,500 bolivars to 5,196,0000 bolivars, that is, from US $0.94 to US $1.92, according to the parallel market exchange rate, which governs most traders to prices.

Comment: Venezuela is in a dire economic situation; unfortunately raising the minimum wage doesn't work:


Card - MC

International community hits back at US tariffs (sanctions) with retaliatory measures

sinking ship
© Danish Siddiqui / Reuters
The trade war that captured the world over recent months has deepened with more countries responding to US tariffs, while others are pledging to toughen already introduced retaliatory measures.

The Chinese commerce ministry said the country is "fully prepared" to hit back against any protective steps Washington may potentially take. The response comes as US President Donald Trump threatened Beijing with another $200 billion in tariffs in addition to the $50 billion already imposed.

"It is deeply regrettable that the US has been capricious, escalated the tensions, and provoked a trade war," said Chinese commerce ministry spokesman Gao Feng, Thursday. "The US is accustomed to holding 'big sticks' for negotiations, but this approach does not apply to China."

Comment: The US has been headed for a massive economic collapse for some time. While these retaliatory measures may hasten the inevitable, it should be understood that the United States has made its bed a long time ago.


Megaphone

The Duran vidcast discusses the massive geopolitical implications of US-China trade war

china us xi trump
China retaliates with $50 Billion tariffs on US goods.
The Trump White House formally announced the list of Chinese products to be hit with tariffs.

The US will implement 25% tariff on $50 Billion in Chinese imports, representing 1,102 product lines with the list of imported goods among those listed on China's 2025 plan.

The US tariffs against China will be implemented in two tiers.

The first tier on July 6th will cover $34 Billion in imports. A second tier will cover the remaining $16 Billion, or 284 product lines.

POTUS Trump said in a statement that the "The United States can no longer tolerate losing our technology and intellectual property through unfair economic practices."

Comment: As noted in the discussion, Trump would be reversing decades of US policy by following through on his campaign promises to bring production back to America. Although in response to Trump's actions, many countries, who no longer rely on the US in the way they once did, are now ditching the dollar as global trade currency putting the US economy on even shakier ground: Russia strikes back against US in global trade war: Dumps half its US Treasury bonds in one month

For more insight on the situation, check out SOTTs': Behind the Headlines: Trump Ditches Europe, Europe Bluffs, Russia and China Carry on With Eurasian Integration




Snakes in Suits

Trump calls out 'Fake News' ABC for running false report that Manafort plead guilty to manslaughter

Paul Manafort
© Jonathan Ernst / ReutersPaul Manafort
ABC News was forced to issue a retraction after it aired graphics that falsely claimed US President Donald Trump's disgraced former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, pleaded guilty to five counts of manslaughter.

Manafort, who has been held in jail since last week over alleged attempted witness tampering, was thrust into the spotlight again on Wednesday after ABC accidentally added 'manslaughter' to his list of charges, none of which are violence-related.

The broadcaster aired the erroneous onscreen graphics that read "Manafort pleads guilty to 5 charges of manslaughter" during its special report on Trump's immigration policy.

While the stunning news only appeared for several seconds, it was enough for the Twittersphere to spot the mistake.

2 + 2 = 4

No, Trump didn't 'cave': The massive holes in Trumps 'no caged children' executive order

Trumpsigning
The media breathed a collective sigh of relief after Trump unveiled his latest Executive Order aimed at preventing the separation of illegal immigrant parents from their children, but had they taken the time to read and analyze the document before responding, they'd have seen that they were deceived by The Donald and that his decree has more holes in it than Swiss cheese.

Judging by media accounts over the past day and even as portrayed by Trump & his press team themselves, Americans would be forgiven for thinking that illegal immigrant parents will never be separated from their children again after the Liberal-driven scandal over the continuation of a controversial Obama-era policy took the nation by storm. After reading the actual Executive Order, however, it becomes clear that there are more holes in it than Swiss cheese, and that the number of conditional workarounds present in the document suggests that not much will probably change in practice apart from a few highly publicized cases strategically focused on in order to deflect negative media attention.

The reason for this pessimism is explained by the following clauses:

------------------------------

(all section summaries and [bolded] emphases are the author's own)

Section 1 - Ambiguities From The Get-Go

"...It is also the policy of this Administration to maintain family unity, including by detaining alien families together where appropriate and consistent with law and available resources..."

It's unclear whether "together" means in the same cell/group holding area or simply in the same facility, and "appropriate" is subject to interpretation. It'll also soon be seen that Trump doubts that the "available resources" for implementing this ambiguous policy exist at this moment, thereby indefinitely perpetuating the status quo.

Comment: The fact is, the only reason this is an issue is because Trump. Children are separated from criminal parents all the time. That's what happens every time an American citizen with children is arrested. His children don't accompany him to prison. Why would it be any different with foreign nationals, especially when there are genuine concerns to be raised, such as the possibility of human trafficking, that the children aren't the adults' children, or are not their legal guardians? From the summary of Scott Adams' latest periscope:
  • Nobody is in favor of kids in cages
    • The child's view: "Just sign something!"
    • The adult's view: "It's not that simple"
    • President Trump paced his critics by giving them what they asked for
  • What happened?
    • Did the President "cave"?
    • Did the American system of checks and balances work as designed?
    • Is this how negotiating works?



Light Sabers

Dysfunctional Macron and Merkel's plan to put burden of dealing with asylum seekers on countries where they first registered could split Europe

migrant boat
© Jesus Merida Luque / Global Look Press
With no end in sight to the EU refugee crisis, Berlin and Paris look to put the burden of dealing with asylum seekers on the countries where they first register. The seeming return to 'old rules' is poised to split Europe further.

During their meeting ahead of the EU summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron pledged to "jointly and resolutely tackle" what they euphemistically called "secondary movements inside the EU." An elusive wording used in the so-called Meseberg Declaration adopted by the two leaders effectively means one thing: Macron and Merkel want all the newly arrived asylum seekers and migrants to stay in the EU countries where they were first registered while their cases are being processed. This would leave the EU southern member states to deal with the new arrivals alone.

The problem, however, is that the same rules embodied in what is known as the ill-fated EU Dublin Regulation already proved to be dysfunctional at the height of the 2015 refugee crisis.

Chess

White House announces NSA adviser Bolton will visit Moscow to discuss meeting between Putin and Trump

Bolton
© Getty ImagesNational Security Advisor John Bolton
U.S. national security adviser John Bolton plans to travel to Moscow in the next few days to discuss a potential meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, the White House says.

"On June 25-27, U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton will meet with U.S. allies in London and Rome to discuss national security issues, and travel to Moscow to discuss a potential meeting between Presidents Trump and Putin," Garrett Marquis, special assistant to the president, wrote on Twitter.

Bolton's specific itinerary was not immediately released.

Red Flag

Inside Hong Kong's paradoxical 'independence' movement's dependence on Washington

Edward Leung
Prominent Hong Kong opposition leader Edward Leung was sentenced to 6 years in prison for assaulting police and his role in leading riots in 2016.

The Guardian in its article "Hong Kong jails independence leader Edward Leung for six years," would report:
Hong Kong's leading independence activist has been jailed for six years for his involvement in some of the city's worst protest violence for decades.

Edward Leung was convicted in May of rioting over the 2016 running battles with police, when demonstrators hurled bricks torn up from pavements and set rubbish alight in the commercial district of Mong Kok.
Western pundits decried the jail sentence as the breakdown of the "rule of law" in Hong Kong. Yet the riots were violent and destructive, and most certainly against the law. For Hong Kong not to jail Leung for his role in criminal activity would constitute an actual breakdown of the rule of law.


Comment: Western nations would've done no less in the same situation. But it's only bad when 'evil dictatorships' do it, apparently.


Edward Leung had been serving as spokesman and by-election candidate for the Hong Kong Indigenous political group. The group seeks the unrealistic goal of stopping influence from mainland China as part of a wider Western-sponsored political movement to maintain Hong Kong as a pressure point vis-a-vis Beijing.

The movement also attempts to hold Beijing to the parting demands made by British occupiers in 1997 including the "One Country, Two Systems" principle which serves as the legal framework Western-sponsored agitators use to justify their activities and notions of "independence."

Comment: Don't expect the targeting of China (and Russia) to end any time soon: Let's be honest - the West absolutely hates China. The U.S. may have been defeated in the Middle East, but that only means that they have set their sights on their biggest global "enemies" (i.e., rivals).


Hearts

Speaking the same language: Kim reportedly praised Pompeo for his guts in April meeting

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un shakes hands with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
© KCNA / ReutersNorth Korean leader Kim Jong Un shakes hands with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
According to the US press, during his meeting with Kim Jong-un in April, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo made a joke about killing the North Korean leader. The reaction could not have been more unexpected.

Still, the head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Mike Pompeo, visited North Korea to begin the negotiations that led to the historic summit between US President Donald Trump and the North Korean leader.

While Pompeo was still director of the agency, North Korea accused the organization of attempting to assassinate Kim, as the Business Insider reported last year. Pompeo himself defended regime change in Pyongyang, after a series of nuclear tests in 2017.

"The North Korean people, I'm sure, are made up of lovely people who would love to see him [Kim] go," Pompeo told CNN in July last year, without citing any evidence.

When he first met Kim personally a few months later, the subject was still taboo. According to Vanity Fair magazine, quoting an anonymous source close to Pompeo, the North Korean leader "immediately questioned" Pompeo about his homicidal desires.

"But Pompeo did not back down," Tracy wrote. "The CIA director joked that he was still trying to kill him, the source said. The two men laughed."

Kim's caution is not unfounded: while the United States official position is that it does not plan any regime changes in foreign countries, reports of training South Korean troops with the rehearsing of Kim's murder are still ongoing, according to Task & Purpose.

However, the prank seems to have worked well, since both Kim and Pompeo posed for photos and proceeded with the negotiations.

"This is the first time I meet someone with the same kind of courage," Kim said of Pompeo after the meeting, according to United Press International.

Comment: You can't hustle a hustler. The main reason the Trump approach has worked so well so far has been because there hasn't been an American leader that can approach the level of bluster Kim excels at. Pompeo seems to know the game, too. Funny how that works.