Puppet MastersS


Biohazard

Best of the Web: Why the door-handle theory of the Skripal poisoning is its Achilles Heel

achilles heel
There are few certainties in the Salisbury case, but one thing I am quite confident of is that Sergei and Yulia Skripal were not poisoned with a nerve agent of "high purity" on the door handle of 47 Christie Miller Road. I am also quite confident that Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey was not poisoned in this way either, and furthermore that his actions, and the subsequent actions of investigators, are the Achilles Heel of the whole explanation. I shall come onto that in due course, but first the Skripals.

There are simply too many things which, when added together, make the door handle explanation at the very least incredibly implausible, if not downright impossible:
Firstly, they did not die immediately, or thereabouts, which is what you would expect to have happened had they been contaminated by coming into contact with what was said to be a nerve agent of "high purity".

Secondly, they were fine for hours afterwards, so much so that they were able to drive to town, feed ducks, go for a meal, and then have a drink.

Thirdly, eye witness accounts of the couple on the bench suggest that they became seriously ill pretty much simultaneously. Certainly, there were no reports of one of the pair calling for help, or contacting the emergency services, which is what you would expect to have happened in the event of one becoming ill before the other.

Fourthly, during the duck feed, which took place just after the Skripals parked their car in Sainsbury's car park, and prior to their visit to Zizzis, Mr Skripal handed bread to some local boys, one of whom apparently ate a piece. I cannot think of a plausible explanation why this boy did not become ill if, as claimed, Mr Skripal's hands were contaminated at that time with a "military grade nerve agent".

Fifthly, either Mr Skripal or his daughter must have touched the parking machine at Sainsbury's car park, which was then touched by literally hundreds of people over the following days. Yet not one of these people were contaminated.

Sixthly, neither the door handle at Zizzis nor the door handle at The Mill were contaminated, despite the fact that either Mr Skripal or Yulia, or perhaps both, would have handled them when going into those venues.
In other words, in order to accept the door handle explanation, you need to ignore every one of these extremely improbable things. If it were someone on a website suggesting it, rather than The Metropolitan Police, you all know what they would be called and what they would be assumed to be wearing on their heads, don't you?

Comment: A couple weeks ago, Slane asked the question: Where is Sergei Skripal? While he has seemingly recovered from the poisoning, he has been incommunicado ever since. We should really be asking another question in addition: Where is Nick Bailey? He too has seemingly disappeared. Why?


Star of David

Flashback Has Israel de facto colonized the United States?

flags israel united states us
Israel "enjoys" its special relationship with the United States; the US is apparently stuck in a special relationship with Israel.
We normally think of colonizers as large countries, and the colonized as smaller and weaker nations. But this is not always the case. Colonization does not require occupation. It merely requires the subjugation of the colonized. With ambition, superior information and calculation, and the right mindset, smaller nations can (and have in the past) colonized and dominated larger and nominally more powerful countries.

India was successfully colonized by tiny Britain in the 18th century. The vehicle for colonization was the East India Company. It was only after the Indian mutiny that Britain acted directly and sent in troops to establish the British Raj. For the next 200 years India was drained of its wealth, its economy was restructured to support England's needs and global ambitions, and its people militarized to fight and die on behalf of the British crown. The Indian leaders who remained were willing participants in this venture; those who felt otherwise were destroyed or marginalized.

Comment: If Americans Knew blog sums it up:
Israel may be small, but so was Britain when it controlled India. Israel doesn't need to control everything in the US, just the important things: AIPAC (with the help of Christian Zionists) controls Middle East policy and keeps aid money flowing by controlling all branches of government; the label "anti-Semite" is used as a weapon; media is kept from any meaningful criticism of Israel; and "exceptionalism" allows the Jewish State to waive rules that every other country on the planet must obey.
Robert Fisk: 'There is no difference between the American and Israeli governments'


Chess

Does US withdrawal from another nuclear treaty really benefit Russia?

s 300
No. Obviously Russia does not benefit from the scrapping of yet another treaty designed to prevent a nuclear exchange amid a war with the United States.

Yet, as an attempt to frame blatant US provocations as somehow "Russia's fault," a narrative has begun circulating - claiming that not only does the US withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty somehow benefit Russia - it was via Russia's "puppet" - US President Donald Trump - that saw the treaty scrapped.

Spreading this scurrilous narrative are political provocateurs like former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul who has re-branded himself recently as a prominent anti-Trump voice - feeding into and feeding off of America's false left-right political paradigm.

Stock Down

US-China trade war heats up as Chinese yuan falls to lowest level since global financial crisis

yuan and dollar
© Reuters/Jason Lee
The People's Bank of China has reportedly let the renminbi slip to a 10-year low against the dollar on Tuesday. A cheaper yuan helps Chinese products mitigate the losses from US import tariffs imposed by President Trump.

The official yuan exchange rate was fixed at 6.9574 per dollar on Tuesday, 0.28 percent weaker than the previous level of 6.9377. This is the weakest yuan fix since 2008.

The last time the Chinese yuan fell to the level of 7 to 1 against the dollar was during the last financial crisis. "If the authorities are mindful of the potential impact on sentiment and capital flows, they have to gauge the potential negative impact on sentiment and overshooting beyond 7 if the level is broken," said Frances Cheung, head of Asia macro strategy at Westpac in Singapore, as quoted by Reuters.

Comment: The US Commerce Dept. also announced restrictions on exports to state-backed Chinese company Fujian Jinhua which makes semiconductors today. The Chinese company will not be able to buy components from US companies without a special license. It explained the ban was put in place because Fujian Jinhua "poses a significant risk of becoming involved in activities that are contrary to the national security interests of the United States."

Despite the escalating trade war with China, Trump insisted that a "great deal" with China is still possible.


Network

Japan turns to Trans-Siberian Railway to test potential connection with Russia, China & S. Korea

road
© Reuters / Ilya Naymushin
Tokyo is planning to conduct a logistics test using the Russian Trans-Siberian Railway and a ferry line to join four countries, including Russia, China, Japan, and South Korea, a Japanese official said Tuesday.

The major goal of the project is to create a new transportation corridor by including the Chinese province of Jilin to a ferry line that currently connects the Russian city of Vladivostok, South Korean Donghae, and Japan's Sakaiminato, according to Nogava Satoshi, vice governor of Japan's smallest prefecture, Tottori.

The official stressed that the logistic corridor may potentially include other territories.

In April, the ferry, dubbed DBS, called at the Russian port of Zarubino, and transported cargo freighted there to China, Satoshi said, adding that the delivery was significantly faster. However, he said the parties still have to solve some problems identified during the testing delivery.

Comment: Japan has historically been a US imperial vassal state, ever since the atom bomb was dropped on them. The news that they are looking towards the "enemies" of the Empire (Russia, China and Korea) certainly seems to be a sign that American control over Japan is waning and that Russian influence in the East is on the rise.


Arrow Down

Jeff Bezos lost record-breaking $19.2 billion of personal wealth in 2 days

bezos
© Reuters / Joshua Roberts
Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos lost a record-breaking $19.2 billion of his personal wealth over the past two trading days, the greatest such loss ever in that timeframe.

Bezos became, and remains, the richest person in modern history this year, however the strength of his position at the top of the global billionaires leaderboard has dipped. Just four months ago the wealth gap between him and Bill Gates, the world's second wealthiest person, stood at $49 billion.

The colossal loss comes amid a global market selloff, which is being further fueled by fears of continuing trade tensions. Amazon shares fell 7.8 percent on Friday and a further 6.3 percent on Saturday, bringing Bezos' fortune to $128.1 billion - much less than the $167.7 billion he peaked at in September.

Try not to feel too bad for the Blue Origin and Washington Post owner, though, even with this loss his personal net worth is still $29 million higher than it was on the first day of 2018, and his current net worth of $128 billion is still significantly higher than Bill Gates' mere $98.2 billion.

The record for greatest decline in personal wealth was previously held by Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, who lost a staggering $16.5 billion following a string of privacy breaches for the social network.

Dollar

Pure plunder: Belgian authorities investigate as billions 'go missing' from frozen Gaddafi accounts

gaddafi
© Reuters / Max Rossi
Prosecutors are investigating whether Belgian banks paid out interest and dividends on accounts frozen under UN sanctions in 2011 after the ouster of the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Up to €5 billion ($5.7 billion) could have been disbursed to people controlling Libyan accounts, including militia groups in the country which stand accused of human rights abuses, according to a report by public broadcaster RTBF which cited an unidentified source.

RTBF said that when the UN agreed to freeze deposits held by Gaddafi's administration abroad, Belgium had done so but had not halted payments of interest and dividends.

With NATO's intervention in 2011, the UN introduced sanctions against the Libyan government's assets, effectively seizing roughly $67 billion from the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA), held across Europe and North America. In the EU, national governments froze only the original amounts, while the interest and dividends earned after 2011 remained a liquid asset.

Comment: In other words, they stole the money saved by and invested by the Libyan govt to fund its superb enterprises and welfare state... to raise an army to destroy the country. Just because they felt like it.

Western savages.


Jet4

Syrian news agency reports US-led coalition strikes another target in Deir Ez-Zor

Deir Ezzor Syria
© Sputnik / Mikhail Alaeddin
The airstrike comes as another crescendo in a series of attacks on the Syrian province Deir Ez-Zor this month. The previous strikes on the area have prompted the Syrian government to address the UN to settle the issue, as there were reports about use of banned white phosphorus.

The US-led coalition jets bombed targets in the town of Al-Shafa in the eastern Syrian province of Deir ez-Zor, the official Twitter account of Al Mayadeen TV channel said on Tuesday.

Attention

Trump vows to corral Central American migrants into 'nice tent cities' pending asylum hearings to deter additional caravans

Trump tent cities migrant caravan
© Reuters / Jose Luis GonzalezTrump told Fox News he plans to build tent cities to hold the thousands of Central American asylum-seekers currently trekking through Mexico on their way to the US border.
Countering charges of fearmongering stemming from his description of Central American migrant caravans as "invasion," President Trump shared his plans to house the newcomers in "very nice" tent cities until their cases are heard.

Trump told Fox News he plans to build tent cities to hold the thousands of Central American asylum-seekers currently trekking through Mexico on their way to the US border. While the tents will be "very nice" - everything Trump builds is, in his mind - he hopes that holding the migrants in these tent cities until their asylum hearings will deter additional caravans from making the crossing.

Current practice, derided by Trump and others as "catch and release," allows asylum-seekers to stay in the US until their hearings, which can be years after they cross the border given the huge backlog of immigration cases.

Many new arrivals, understandably, never turn up for the hearing, having successfully blended into American society and not wishing to risk being turned back to their country of origin. Restricting them to tent cities - no matter how "nice" - ensures they will be present at their hearing, where - according to Fox News host Laura Ingraham - 80 percent will be sent home.

Comment: See also:


Attention

Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens will prompt constitutional challenge

Illegal immigrant minors Texas
© Reuters / HandoutIllegal immigrant minors detained at a facility in Texas
President Trump is planning on signing an executive order ending the automatic right to citizenship for children of noncitizens and illegal immigrants born in the US. Trump's statement has prompted a Constitutional uproar.

"We're the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States for 85 years with all of those benefits," Trump told Axios in an interview taped on Monday. "It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. And it has to end."

While Trump was ambiguous on the subject, it is likely that the children of legal immigrants who have attained US citizenship will be unaffected by the planned policy order.

Comment: See also: