Puppet MastersS


Star of David

Does the Epstein scandal connect with Israeli influence on Trump?

Les Wexner Jeffrey Epstein
Les Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein
Unless you're another Rip van Winkel, it's impossible to miss the revived and relentless calls for war with Iran, from US State and the media. Braying for war with Iran is extant far beyond the halls of US State power, to encompass a virtual media frenzy in the west.

After a spate of curious and fruitless false flags intended to incite war between Iran and the United States, we must consider several other related events, at least one of which does not appear to be geopolitical, but certainly is.

To critically consider the Epstein case in the context of a geopolitical event — and not simply as a unique criminal case — let's first consider this rather strange selection of bizarre world events, since 2017:
  • Trump moves US Embassy in tel Aviv, to Jerusalem: On December 6, 2017, Trump declared that the US embassy in Tel Aviv must re-locate to Jerusalem, to the dismay of just about everyone except major donor Sheldon Adelson and Netanyahu. On its own, the move may be seen as a concession to Trump's major donors.
  • Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from the JCPOA: On May 8, 2018, Trump withdrew the US from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran, usually seen as another concession to his major donors.
  • Donald Trump gives the Golan to Israel: On March 25th, 2019 Trump recognized the Israeli annexation of the Golan Heights, even though such recognition is totally illegal by international law.
  • Trump decided to attack Iran ... then he didn't: On June 20th, 2019 Trump called for a retaliatory strike on Iran in retaliation for a downed US drone, then called it off. This event will be important to note, later on.
  • Mueller Investigation Winds Up with no Finding of Collusion: On March 23rd , 2019 the Mueller report was submitted with no findings, and the relevant link here will be established, later in this article.
While the first three points above may be seen as concessions to Trump's major donors, note that other major campaign promises were not kept. Those abandoned campaign promises have not been addressed or recognized by Trump at any time, including his failure to return American jobs and industry to the US, or vacating his promise to rebuild crumbling US infrastructure. So... why deliver on some promises and not on others?

Comment: It seems simplistic and unlikely that Epstein is being brought out again in a bid to force Trump's hand on Iran, as Brown concedes. Full disclosure on Epstein's antics threatens to reveal a lot - potentially too much. Brown's conclusion - that the deep state simply wants to show that it has absolute power - may be correct, but it doesn't seem to have much with the Epstein case at this point. They already made that point the first time with the plea deal that let Epstein walk. Perhaps there is no master plan behind the current surge of Epstein news. It's possible the revived interest and journalism on Epstein actually have the perps sweating. We'll just have to wait and see if anything comes of it.

To see the connections Brown mentions above in detail - in addition to many more - do check out Ryan Dawson's Epstein map presentation. Epstein, Les Wexner, the Bronfmans, NXIUM, Ehud Barak, Harvey Weinstein, Lewis Libby, Richard Perle, Adnan Khashoggi, Marc Rich, the Clintons, Dershowitz, the Kushners, and all the connected rape convictions, pedophilia, sex trafficking, and sexual blackmail. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Video starts at 6:00:




Arrow Down

FBI's Steele Dossier spreadsheet puts a stake through the heart of 'Russian collusion'

christopher steele trump dossier
© The TelegraphChristopher David Steele, former British intelligence officer behind a dossier of lurid allegations about Donald Trump
Some in the news media have tried in recent days to rekindle their long-lost love affair with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele and his now infamous dossier.

The main trigger was a lengthy interview in June with the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general, which some news outlets suggested meant U.S. officials have found Steele, the former Hillary Clinton-backed political muckraker, to be believable.

"Investigators ultimately found Steele's testimony credible and even surprising," Politico crowed. The Washington Post went even further, suggesting Steele's assistance to the inspector general might "undermine Trumpworld's alt-narrative" that the Russia-collusion investigation was flawed.

Jet2

No F-35s for Turkey? That's okay, Russia ready to discuss delivery of Su-35s

SU-35S Russian plane
© Creative Commons
The statement comes on the heels of Washington announcing that Turkey's decision to purchase Russian S-400 air defence systems "renders its continued involvement with the F-35 impossible".

Sergei Chemezov, head of the state corporation Rostec, said on Thursday that Moscow may strike a deal with Ankara on the delivery of Su-35 warplanes.

"If our Turkish colleagues express a desire, we are ready to work out deliveries of Su-35 fighter jets", Chemezov stated.

A Turkish military source later told Sputnik that President Edogan would study the offer.

Previously, the CEO said that Russia could sell Su-57 fighter jets to Turkey if Ankara ends its participation in the F-35 jet programme.

The news comes as the Turkish Defence Ministry on Friday announced that the delivery of the S-400s had begun with eight Russian planes bringing parts for the defence systems to Turkey.

Comment: See also: The F-35 is overrated. And the S-400 is the top of its class. So Turkey appears to be making all the right choices, U.S. threats and belligerence notwithstanding.


Document

'It's going to be staggering': Jeffrey Epstein associates prepare for worst in imminent document dump

Jeffrey Epstein
© Corbis/Getty ImagesSex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein
As the Jeffrey Epstein case continues to unfold, a laundry list of celebrities, business magnates and socialites who have flown anywhere near the registered sex offender's orbit are now tainted with pedo-polonium. Many of them, such as Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak, and Victoria's Secret boss Les Wexner have sought to distance themselves from Epstein and his activities - however their attempts have fallen on deaf ears considering their extensive ties to the pedophile.

As Vanity Fair's Gabriel Sherman notes, "The questions about Epstein are metastasizing much faster than they can be answered: Who knew what about Epstein's alleged abuse? How, and from whom, did Epstein get his supposed $500 million fortune? Why did Acosta grant Epstein an outrageously lenient non-prosecution agreement? (And what does it mean that Acosta was reportedly told Epstein "belonged to intelligence"?)"

Also illuminating is a statement by attorney Brad Edwards, who said during a Wednesday press conference seated next to Epstein accuser Courtney Wild that "There were other business associates of Mr. Epstein's who engaged in improper sexual misconduct at one or more of his homes. We do know that," adding "In due time the names are going to start coming out."

Comment: See also:


Better Earth

The West freaks out over 'Frankenstein' China while New Silk Road is already decades ahead

frankenstein
© iStockWestern intellectuals freak over 'Frankenstein' China.

Academics in Beijing plot decoupling business with the US and teaming up with EU and ASEAN
Western economists and intellectuals obsessed with demonization of China are never shy of shortcuts glaringly exposing their ignorance. The latest outburst posits that "we" - as in Western intellectuals - "are the modern version of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein," who electro-shocked a dead body (China) into a resurrected "murderous monster."

So, welcome to the Sino-Frankenstein school of international relations. What next? A black and white remake with Xi Jinping playing the monster? Anyway, "we" - as in mankind's best hope - should "avoid carrying on in the role of Frankenstein."

The author is an economics professor emeritus at Harvard. He cannot even identify who's to blame for Frankenstein - the West or the Chinese. That says much about Harvard's academic standards.

Now, compare this with what was being discussed at a trade war symposium at Renmin University in Beijing this past Saturday.

Comment: Pepe Escobar shares on Facebook a few ways of how China is divesting itself of the dollar:
THE NEW SILK ROADS AND THE US DOLLAR

Will China build up the vast New Silk Roads/Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) with US dollars?

Michael Hudson has the answer:

"No, they are getting rid of dollars. They already are receiving such a large surplus each year that they only use the dollars to buy gold or some goods, such as Boeing airplanes, but mostly food and raw materials. When China buys iron from Australia, for instance, they sell dollars from their foreign-exchange reserves and buy Australian currency to pay Australians for the iron ore that they import. They use dollars to pay other countries that are still part of the dollar area and still willing to keep adding these dollars to their official monetary reserves instead of holding gold."
See also:


Bullseye

Ilhan Omar has introduced a resolution affirming that Americans have the right to boycott Israel

Ilhan Omar
© WikimediaIlhan Omar
Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar has introduced a bill affirming that Americans have the right to participate in boycotts. Although the legislation doesn't specifically mention the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), it coincides with an anti-BDS resolution that is currently being pushed by many Democrats.

House Resolution 496 (HRes496) asserts that boycotts "have been effectively used in the United States by advocates for equal rights since the Boston Tea Party and include boycotts led by civil rights activists during the 1950s and 1960s in order to advocate for racial equality, such as the Montgomery bus boycott, and promote workers' rights, such as the United Farm Workers-led boycott of table grapes." It also identifies historical moments when Americans participated in boycotts to push human rights in other countries: the boycotting of Imperial Japan during the late 1930s, the boycotting of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1941, the boycotting of the 1980 summer Olympics in Moscow, and the boycotting of South Africa. The text of the bill also takes aim at legislative efforts to prohibit boycotts urging, "Congress, States, and civil rights leaders from all communities to endeavor to preserve the freedom of advocacy for all by opposing anti-boycott resolutions and legislation."

Arrow Up

US complains about Iran's missiles yet the influx of American weapons is "making our region ready to explode" - Iranian FM

Zarif
© Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty ImagesIran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif speaks during a press conference in Tehran on June 10, 2019.
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said Monday that if President Donald Trump truly wants to engage in good-faith negotiations over Iran's ballistic missile program, his administration must stop selling tens of billions of dollars in weapons to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and other U.S. allies in the Middle East.

Zarif, who is in New York on United Nations business, told NBC's Lester Holt that the influx of American weapons is "making our region ready to explode."

"If you want to discuss ballistic missiles, then we need to discuss the amount of weapons that are sold to our region," said Zarif. "Last year, Iran spent $16 billion altogether on its military. We have a 82 million population... The United Arab Emirates, with a million population, spent $22 billion. Saudi Arabia — with less than half of our population — spent $67 billion, most of them are American [arms]."

Comment: RFE/RL reports that Trump is claiming a lot of progress has been made, despite denials from Tehran:
U.S. President Donald Trump says "a lot of progress" has been made toward ending a tense standoff with Iran, even as tough language continues to be exchanged between the two sides.

"A lot of progress has been made. We'll see what happens. But a lot of progress has been made," Trump told a cabinet meeting on July 16, referring to Washington's efforts to persuade Tehran to negotiate over its missile program.

Trump's remarks echoed those made by his secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, who told the cabinet that Iran had signaled a readiness to negotiate with Washington on the matter.

"The Iranian regime is struggling to figure out what they're going to do with their economy because we've been terribly effective," Pompeo said.

"And the result is...frankly, I think it was yesterday, maybe the day before, for the first time the Iranians have said that they're prepared to negotiate about their missile program. So we will have this opportunity, I hope, if we continue to execute our strategy appropriately, we'll have this opportunity to negotiate a deal that will actually prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon."


Iran has been at the negotiating table from the very beginning, it's the US that has been intent on sabotaging any agreements.


Pompeo appeared to be referring to comments by Iran's foreign minister in an interview with U.S. television on July 15. Mohammad Javad Zarif, who was in New York for a UN conference, told NBC News that Shi'ite-led Iran would discuss its missile program only after Washington stopped arming Sunni Arab states Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which are bitter regional rivals of Iran.

However, Alireza Miryousefi, a spokesman for Iran's mission at the United Nations, wrote on Twitter, "Iran's missiles...are absolutely and under no condition negotiable with anyone or any country, period."

"We categorically reject the...characterization of [Zarif's] comments to NBC News that 'if the U.S. wants to talk about missiles, it should stop selling weapons, including missiles, to regional states' as meaning that Iran is willing to negotiate on its defensive missiles," he wrote.


Tensions have surged between Washington and Tehran since the United States last year withdrew from a 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran and reimposed sanctions after the U.S. administration said the deal would enable Tehran to produce a nuclear weapon in a few years. The sanctions have devastated the Iranian economy.

Trump and other U.S. officials have said Iran's continued testing of ballistic missiles violates the spirit of the accord, claiming the technology can be used to develop nuclear weapons. Iran says its missile program is strictly for defensive purposes and that its nuclear program is for civilian use.

"They can't have a nuclear weapon," Trump told the cabinet meeting. "We want to help them. We'll be good to them, we'll work with them. We'll help them in any way we can, but they can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not looking, by the way, for regime change."

"They [also] can't be testing ballistic missiles," he added.

Iran has announced breaches of the 2015 nuclear accord and said that more will follow if Europe does not help the country overcome the damaging effects of U.S. sanctions.

Iran has said the breaches could be reversed if Washington returned to the deal, even as it accused Washington of waging "economic war."

"Western governments' major vice is their arrogance," said Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"If the country opposing them is a weak one, their arrogance works. But if it's a country that knows and stands up against them, they will be defeated."
The US is having to reconsider its position on Iran because starvation sanctions, intimidation and false flags, for now, don't appear to be working:


Arrow Up

Duterte defies UN human rights panel, says he'll 'only face a trial in a Philippine court'

mural of Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte
© REUTERS/Romeo RanocoA mural of Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte overlooks prisoners inside the Manila City Jail, October 16, 2017. It reads: "Steer away from illegal drugs to save your life and in turn, will save the country's."
Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has defiantly refused to cooperate with a UN human rights tribunal, saying that if he is ever to be put on trial over his 'War on Drugs', it would have to be in the Philippines.

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) adopted a resolution last Thursday to investigate alleged human rights abuses by Duterte's government as part of Manila's 'War on Drugs.' The measure was introduced to the 48-member international body by Iceland, prompting Duterte to consider severing ties with the Nordic nation.

In an interview with Philippines pastor Apollo Quiboloy on Wednesday, Duterte said that he would never recognize the UN organization's authority.

Bullseye

Big Tech is taking a beating by both sides in Washington

Matt Perault
© Andrew Harrer/BloombergFrom left, Facebook's Matt Perault, Amazon's Nate Sutton, and Apple's Kyle Andeer, swear in to a House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust hearing in Washington, D.C., on July 16.
Facebook, Google and Amazon grappled with multiple attacks across Washington from lawmakers and President Donald Trump over a range of grievances that underscored the kind of reckoning the companies could face.

House Democrats on Tuesday grilled Amazon.com Inc. over perceived conflicts of interest on its platform, while senators from both parties slammed Facebook Inc. over its plan to introduce a cryptocurrency, saying the company can't be trusted. Alphabet Inc.'s Google got broadsides from Senate Republicans who complained of anti-conservative bias and from Trump, who said he wants the Justice Department to look into its work in China.

The pressure isn't going away. Facebook Vice President David Marcus is facing another day of testimony Wednesday answering questions about its Libra cyrptocurrency project from the House Committee on Financial Services. Panel chairwoman Maxine Waters has called on the company to stop the project while Congress investigates.

David Marcus
© Andrew Harrer/BloombergDavid Marcus speaks during a hearing in Washington, D.C., on July 16.

Comment: See also:


Roses

5 years on since MH17 was shot down, killing 298 people: Nobody has yet been held officially responsible

MH17 Memorial at AMS
© Roman Boed/Wikipedia CommonsA makeshift memorial at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, Netherlands for victims of flight MH17.
On July 17, 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down by a missile over eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 people on board and spawning an ongoing political battle.

The aircraft, a Boeing 777, was traveling between Amsterdam and Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, when it was shot out of the sky by a Russian-made missile over Donetsk, a territory controlled by pro-Russian separatists who want to take the region out of Ukraine.

It took almost five years for anyone to be formally accused of the attack, and the suspects have not been apprehended.

The incident only increased tensions between Ukraine and Russia, with each nation repeatedly contradicting the other's account. As Kiev and Moscow squabble, families continue to call for justice, and criticism that the US hasn't stood up to Russia over the incident remains.

Comment: