Puppet MastersS


Arrow Down

Zero hour for French President Macron as Prime Minister Bayrou's government collapses

macron bayrou president prime minister france
© Ludovic marin / POOL / AFPFrance's Prime Minister Francois Bayrou (R) arrives to hear France's President Emmanuel Macron deliver a speech to army leaders at l'Hôtel de Brienne in Paris on July 13, 2025, on the eve of the annual Bastille Day Parade in the French capital.
Paris politics has once again descended into chaos, as the government of Prime Minister François Bayrou collapsed on Monday after the National Assembly overwhelmingly voted against a confidence measure brought forward by the embattled PM in a last-ditch effort to pass through a national budget.

The deadlock over the budget came in large part as a result of President Macron's Machiavellian move during last summer's legislative elections to form a pact between his centrist coalition and the leftist New Popular Front (NFP) in the second round of voting after Marine Le Pen's National Rally looked to be on the cusp of taking power. The move resulted in a three-way split within the National Assembly, with no faction able to govern effectively.

Macron first turned to former EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier; however, despite his reputation as a firm hand, his government collapsed in just over three months after the Eurocrat attempted to push through budget measures without a vote in the parliament. Unable to dissolve the National Assembly for a year after the previous election, Macron then turned to long-time ally and Mayor of Pau, François Bayrou, in a second attempt at bridging the divided legislature.

Comment: NY Post adds:
Bayrou conceded in his last speech as prime minister to the National Assemnly that putting his fate on the line was risky. But he said that France's debt crisis compelled him to seek legislative support for remedies, in the face of what he called "a silent, underground, invisible, and unbearable hemorrhage" of excessive public borrowing.

"The greatest risk was to not take one, to let things go on without changing anything, to go on doing politics as usual," he said. "Submission to debt is like submission through military force. Dominated by weapons, or dominated by our creditors, because of a debt that is submerging us — in both cases, we lose our freedom."

At the end of the first quarter of 2025, France's public debt stood at 3.346 trillion euros, or 114% of gross domestic product. Debt servicing remains a major budget item, accounting for around 7% of state spending.

[...]

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen called for Macron to again dissolve the National Assembly, seemingly confident that her National Rally party and its allies would win a majority in another snap legislative election, positioning it to form a new government.

"A big country like France cannot live with a paper government, especially in a tormented and dangerous world," she said in the National Assembly.

[...]

Macron's chosen successor will operate in the same precarious environment and face the same pressing budget problems that dogged Bayrou and his predecessors. Macron himself has vowed to stay in office until the end of his term, but risks becoming a lame duck domestically if political paralysis continues.

Under the French political system, the prime minister is appointed by the president, accountable to the parliament and is in charge of implementing domestic policy, notably economic measures.
The reason France (and Germany and the UK) are going broke is their unhinged financial commitment to propping up Ukraine. The EU talking shop's policies are having real effects on the citizens under their heel, but they don't care. The grift must go on.


Attention

Can Trump re-adjust in the post-Tianjin SCO moment? Was the timing of China 'throwing down the SCO gauntlet' entirely fortuitous?

Xi and Donald
© Public Domain
The gloves are off. The SCO Summit was a clear demonstration of the reality of power starkly coalescing, on the one hand, and one of power visibly ebbing, on the other. The amazing military parade was the summit counterpart - it spoke loudly: You want to take us on? 'We are ready'.

China has thrown down the gauntlet with precision timing. (You'd almost think they had planned it that way ...). 'History is being written - in Russian and Chinese ink', observed one Russian commentator.

Western political systems are in turmoil, beleaguered by populist politics promising everything, yet lacking the tools by which to resolve anything. Western alliances are riven by doubt and uncertainty, with political stability fissuring under pressure from the failures of western borrow and spend policies. Even The Economist concedes that "a new reality is taking hold".

Trump's reaction to the SCO spectacle was a snarky dig at some perceived anti-American 'conspiracy'. Yet, if he feels himself to be the 'wallflower' to this gathering of 'friends', it is because he chose not to go to Tianjin. He has only himself to blame. Should the SCO become defined in the western psyche as anti-western, then that too will be largely down to Trump - and how he chooses to frame the U.S.' future.

Xi made this latter point in his opening speech: "Humanity is again faced with a choice of peace or war, dialogue or confrontation, and win-win outcomes; or zero-sum games".

Unfortunately, Trump is probably too far down the road of pursuing American 'exceptionalist greatness' to expect much of a nuanced response from him. But then again, Trump often does seem to defy the obvious.

The default psychological mode of the West will be defensively antagonistic. The U.S. clearly has not been prepared psychologically to go onto any sort of equal footing with these SCO powers. Centuries of colonial superiority have shaped a culture where the only possible model is hegemony and the imposition of pro-Western dependency.

To acknowledge China, Russia or India as having 'detached' from the 'Rules-based Order' and constructed a separated non-western sphere clearly implies accepting the end of western global hegemony. And it means accepting too, that the hegemonic era as a whole is over. The U.S. and European ruling strata are categorically not in the mood for this. The European ruling strata, like true believers, continue to bristle with hostility toward Russia.

Skull

Zelensky has insulted Trump. Is he suicidal?

Zelensky
The Ukrainian leader risks alienating the only power besides Moscow with a realistic approach to ending the war

In a weekend interview with ABC News, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky accused US President Donald Trump of giving Russian President Vladimir Putin "what he wanted" at the Alaska summit in August.

Whether a passing complaint or a calculated jab, it may come at a steep cost for Zelensky. To suggest that Trump bent to Putin's will is to imply weakness, and weakness is something Trump never tolerates being accused of. This rhetorical swipe was directed at a man who holds significant sway over the trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine war. For Zelensky, the insult may prove more damaging than cathartic.

Zelensky overestimates his leverage

Zelensky appears to believe that he has become indispensable in Trump's calculations, that Washington's policy revolves around Kiev's demands. But this overstates his importance. Trump has been consistent about one priority: he wants the war to end, and more than that, he wants the US disentangled from it. His approach reflects the sentiment of much of the American public - weary of sending weapons and aid overseas while domestic problems fester.

Comment: Zelensky's usefulness for the West in its proxywar with Russia is running out.

See also:


Music

Tide is turning: Asian state looks to BRICS and SCO for new global ties

Laotian Prime Minister Sonexay Siphandone.
© Vladimir SmirnovLaotian Prime Minister Sonexay Siphandone.
Laos has confirmed its interest in joining both the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS. Laotian Prime Minister Sonexay Siphandone said in an interview with RT that the country is looking to expand economic partnerships and open up new trade routes.

Although not a full member of the SCO, Laos was recently granted dialogue partner status. President Thongloun Sisoulith represented the country at the recent SCO summit in China, underscoring the importance Laos places on this growing relationship.

"We have always highly valued the cooperation mechanism and especially to further develop our economy and trade," the prime minister said when asked about the country's recent entry into the SCO as a dialogue partner. He added that "this will further broaden our cooperation in terms of economy, trade and investment among the member states and dialogue partners."

Comment: Trump has been doing a great job in getting countries to commit to the SCO and BRICS organisations. The blackmail and bullying which the US has done before behind the scenes are now done openly and it opening up people's eyes.

That Laos has not turned away from the US before is amazing considering that Laos thanks to the US, has the record of being the most heavily bombed country in the world.
Between 1964 and 1973, the US dropped 2 million tons of bombs on Laos, nearly equal to the 2.1 million tons of bombs the US dropped on Europe and Asia during all of World War II. This made Laos the most heavily bombed country in history relative to the size of its population; The New York Times notes this was "nearly a ton for every person in Laos".[44]

Some 80 million bombs failed to explode and remain scattered throughout the country. Unexploded ordnance (UXO), including cluster munitions and mines, kill or maim approximately 50 Laotians every year.
From 1973 and until 1995, the US didn't do any mine clerance in Laos (according to Grok). Since then the US has invested $391 million towards mine clearance, but has never paid reparations for those killed and maimed by the ordinances. USAID did do mine clearance in Laos, before it was cut down, but what else did USAID get up to, while they were having the humanitarian front of clearing mines? Is this new openness to align with SCO and the BRICS countries also linked indirectly to the recent cut in USAID in Laos as it would also limit the power of the darker subversive activities of the USAID/CIA guys?


SOTT Logo Radio

SOTT Focus: NewsReal: 'Dept of War' - Trump's Rebrand Heralds End of Pax Americana

trump war venezuela china oil
© Sott.net
Still salty from the sight of the leaders of China, India and Russia "conspiring" against him at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Tianjin last week, Trump has launched a 'rebranding' of the US Department of Defense to its pre-WW2 name: the Department of War! A bad omen? A more honest name? It certainly heralds the end of an era.

On this week's show, we discuss Americans' difficulties adjusting to the new multipolar global order, their apparent misconception that being 'the pole' country of the Western hemisphere gives them legal/moral right to bully Venezuela for control of its natural resources, and their chronic avoidance of rampant crime much closer to home.


Running Time: 01:59:13

Download: MP3 — 109 MB


Briefcase

Gall: New York AG to appeal ruling tossing Trump's $454M civil fraud penalty

JamesTRump
© AP/The Telegraph.com/Getty Images/KJNNew York Attorney Letitia James • Former US President Donald Trump



Comment: James seems to be hoping she can grandstand her way out of her own (considerable) legal troubles. Pathetic and sad.


New York Attorney General Letitia James will appeal a ruling that tossed out the half-billion-dollar penalty against President Donald Trump as part of the guilty verdict in his civil fraud case.

In a filing to the Court of Appeals, James signaled that her office will ask the panel of judges to overrule the lower court's decision and reinstate the penalty while upholding the finding that Trump, his eldest sons and his business were liable for a decade's worth of business fraud.

The notice filed by James's office late Thursday doesn't outline arguments as to why the lower court's decision should be reversed, which will be detailed in future court filings.

Comment: Indeed:






TV

Lawsuits work: CBS overhauls 'Face the Nation' interview format after ANOTHER editing controversy sparks backlash

noem cbs deceptive edit interview
© CBS/screen shotDHS Secretary Kristi Noem blasted CBS on social media after her interview with "Face the Nation" aired on Sunday, August 31, 2025.
Network announces live-only interview policy following recent controversies

CBS News announced Friday it will change the way Face the Nation handles interviews and the program will only broadcast live, or live-to-tape, interviews moving forward.

The surprise announcement comes on the heels of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accusing CBS News of editing her interview Sunday to "whitewash the truth" about an alleged MS-13 gang member. It also arrives months after the company settled President Donald Trump's "election interference" lawsuit in July that accused CBS News of deceptive editing.

Attention

Of empires and famines

British Empire used famine as a weapon of war dozens of times. It will continue to do so until it is defeated and quarantined from the rest of humanity.
Indian Famine
© Alex Krainer's Substack
The unbearable, yet persisting blight on humanity today is the deliberate starvation of the two million Palestinian people in Gaza, or however many are still left alive. The figure is probably closer to 1.5 million. It may seem like the worst thing humanity has witnessed since who knows when except that, unfortunately, it's only the most recent and most widely reported example of the empire's monstrous misdeeds.

Many of us recall the famines in Somalia, Sudan or Ethiopia but those seemed like accidents of nature or consequences of civil wars that raged between camps dominated by cruel, barbarous warlords who couldn't or wouldn't settle their differences by any civilized means. Any involvement by Western powers in such atrocities was strictly the domain of unhinged conspiracy theorists and little more.

Footprints

The Venezuela military deployment is about cronyism, not national security

Oil rigs
© Adobe
In recent weeks, four US Navy ships and a nuclear submarine, all carrying thousands of service members, have been deployed by President Trump to the waters off Venezuela's coast.

Tensions between Trump and the Venezuelan regime led by President Nicolás Maduro are nothing new. In his first term, Trump accelerated Washington's long-standing strategy of using brutal sanctions to crush the Venezuelan economy while trying to prop up domestic officials aligned with the US government.

However, as is often the case, the Venezuelan people haven't seen the foreign government helping to destroy their economy, or the domestic figures being backed by it, to be worth supporting. So Maduro remains in power.

Early in this second Trump term, the administration tried to ratchet things up by linking Maduro's regime to a Venezuelan gang operating in parts of the US called Tren de Aragua. That link was used to justify the government's national emergency declaration at the southern border by framing the gang's violence here in the US as a literal invasion by the Venezuelan government.

That specific argument fell apart, however, when it was revealed that the intelligence memo administration officials were relying on for that argument actually said there was no evidence of a link between the gang and Maduro's government. The Trump administration has since pivoted and now argueswithout any public evidence — that Maduro and his regime are actually the ringleaders of a major drug cartel called the Cartel of the Suns.

Star of David

West Bank annexation plan is just one more dirty game that Israel plays with the West

Smotrich/Map
© Public domainMap or Israel West Bank • Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich
Could Israel be so reckless to scupper such a momentous deal as its own normalisation with the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco?

As far as cunning plans go, Israel's claim that it will annex 80 percent of the West Bank is as bold and as whacky as it gets. But will it work? And perhaps more to the point, is it a threat that they intend to go through with, or is it simply a bluff?

The West Bank often is underreported and rarely gets the media oxygen it deserves. Some might be forgiven that this latest announcement of Israel's extreme right ministers of intending to annex the West Bank is out of the blue. In fact, the Israelis have been considering the plan for quite some time. If it weren't for the Hamas attack of October 7th 2023, a longer, more measured policy of allowing settlers to do it for them - with the occasional days of military intervention - might have done the job. Some might even argue that the land grabs and the dirty work of armed settlers there stealing houses and land played a key role in the Hamas attack. But the truth is that the idea is nothing new and that Israel has wanted all along to take more land and control of West Bank and now it has the perfect pretext to do it.

Comment: Any preference for a Palestinian state feeds Israel's 'Pavlovian resolve' to annex.