OF THE
TIMES

"Had stringent restrictions short of a mandatory lockdown been introduced earlier than March 16th 2020 - when the number of COVID-19 cases was lower - the mandatory lockdown might have been shorter or, conceivably, avoided entirely. ... At the very least, there would have been time to establish what the effect of those restrictions on levels of incidence were and whether there was a sustained reduction in social contact. This would have enabled the governments to assess whether stringent restrictions short of a lockdown would suffice to prevent health services across the UK being overwhelmed and whether they were therefore a feasible policy option."The right and honourable baroness quoted Mark Woolhouse, a Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh, who told the inquiry that "more proportionate and sustainable interventions" such as contact tracing, self-isolation, face coverings and respiratory hygiene, should have been introduced "as early as March 4th 2020."

Comment: Though there is no mention by anyone (including Kelly himself) of the "illegal orders" he is referencing, one might presume it is with regard to events in Venezuela:
Kelly might have a point.