Science & TechnologyS


Fireball 4

Dino-killing asteroid also sparked global firestorm

Impact Event
© NASA/JPLAn asteroid believed to have smacked Earth some 65 million years ago likely caused a global firestorm that led to extensive plant and animal extinctions, a new study shows.
The huge asteroid impact thought to have wiped out the dinosaurs some 65 million years ago may have painted the sky a blazing-hot red and sparked a cataclysmic global firestorm, researchers say.

Most scientists believe the mass die-off known as the K-T extinction - which saw up to 80 percent of all species vanish - was caused by an asteroid or comet that carved out the 112-mile (180 kilometers) Chicxulub crater in what is today Mexico.

Researchers who created a new model of the disaster say the impact would have sent vaporized particles of rock high above the planet's atmosphere, where they would have condensed into sand-grain-sized bits. Falling back to Earth, the hot ejected rock material may have dumped enough heat in the upper atmosphere to cause it to bake at 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit (1,482 degrees Celsius), turning the sky red for several hours.

This infrared "heat pulse" would have acted like a broiler oven, igniting tinder below and cooking every twig, bush, tree, and basically every living thing not shielded underground or underwater, the researchers say.

"It's likely that the total amount of infrared heat was equal to a 1 megaton bomb exploding every four miles over the entire Earth," study researcher Douglas Robertson, of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, or CIRES, said in a statement.

Einstein

Transition between monkey and human speech patterns found

Image
Scientists reason they have identified a transitional communication 'missing link' between human speech and the sounds monkeys make.

According to a story filed by The Register, researchers have been studying Gelada baboons, which live in the Ethiopian highlands. They have discovered similarities between the lip-smacking sounds that these primates make and to patterns in human speech.

Thore Bergman, Assistant Professor at the University of Michigan, said the noises are strikingly similar to those made by human beings, to the point that he said it sounded like people talking while he was in their proximity.

Bergman said,
"I would find myself frequently looking over my shoulder to see who was talking to me, but it was just the geladas. It was unnerving to have primate vocalizations sound so much like human voices."

Info

Seeking immortality? So have others...

Immortality_1
© Corbis Images

Becoming immortal would mean trading your body for that of a machine with the 2045 Initiative.
Can money buy immortality? Russian Internet mogul Dmitry Itskov believes that through his newest venture he'll be able to give humans the ability to live forever through his 2045 Initiative.

By the year 2045, Itskov's group aspires to create the technology in which the person's consciousness is transferred into "hologram-like human avatars." Itskov's idea might not be technologically possible now, but that doesn't mean it isn't plausible in the near future.

However, if there's one constant so far in the history of men pursuing the eternal life, it's that none of them have succeeded.

Info

Can your blood cells smell?

Smell
© AlenD/Shutterstock
The nose is a highly specialized organ, and for years it has been assumed that it is the only part of the human body which is finely attuned to receiving and process odors.

However, a new study presented at 245th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society in New Orleans reported that heart, blood, lung and other cells have the same receptors for sensing odors that are present in the nose.

"Our team recently discovered that blood cells - not only cells in the nose - have odorant receptors," said the study's lead researcher Peter Schieberle, director of the German Research Center for Food Chemistry.

"In the nose, these so-called receptors sense substances called odorants and translate them into an aroma that we interpret as pleasing or not pleasing in the brain," he continued. "But surprisingly, there is growing evidence that also the heart, the lungs and many other non-olfactory organs have these receptors. And once a food is eaten, its components move from the stomach into the bloodstream."

"But does this mean that, for instance, the heart 'smells' the steak you just ate? We don't know the answer to that question," Schieberle said.

Eye 1

Google revolution isn't worth our privacy

Image
This is a future we would be wise to avoid, writes Evgeny Morozov

Let's give credit where it is due: Google is not hiding its revolutionary ambitions. As its co-founder Larry Page put it in 2004, eventually its search function "will be included in people's brains" so that "when you think about something and don't really know much about it, you will automatically get information".

Science fiction? The implant is a rhetorical flourish but Mr Page's utopian project is not a distant dream. In reality, the implant does not have be connected to our brains. We carry it in our pockets - it's called a smartphone.

So long as Google can interpret - and predict - our intentions, Mr Page's vision of a continuous and frictionless information supply could be fulfilled. However, to realise this vision, Google needs a wealth of data about us. Knowing what we search for helps - but so does knowing about our movements, our surroundings, our daily routines and our favourite cat videos.

Some of this information has been collected through our browsers but in a messy, disaggregated form. Back in 1996, Google didn't set out with a strategy for world domination. Its acquisition of services such as YouTube was driven by tactics more than strategy. While it was collecting a lot of data from its many services, from email to calendar, such data were kept in separate databases - which made the implant scenario hard to accomplish.

Sherlock

Study ties baldness to heart disease

This only applied to men who have hair loss from the top and in front of their heads. Those with a receding hairline are reportedly not affected.


Comet

New Comet: C/2013 F2 (Catalina)

Discovery Date: March 24, 2013

Magnitude: 18.1 mag

Discoverer: A. Boattini (Catalina Sky Survey)
C/2013 F2
© Aerith NetMagnitude graph
The orbital elements are published on M.P.E.C. 2013-F58.

Comet 2

New Comet: C/2013 F1 (Boattini)

Discovery Date: March 23, 2013

Magnitude: 17.9 mag

Discoverer: A. Boattini (Catalina Sky Survey)
C/2013 F1
© Aerith NetMagnitude graph
The orbital elements are published on M.P.E.C. 2013-F46.

Bulb

The anti-drone hoodie that helps you beat Big Brother's spy in the sky

Image
© David Levene for the GuardianBlending in? … The anti-drone hoodie, as modelled by Tom Meltzer, keeps surveillance off your back.
Unmanned surveillance drones are a global concern, but designer Adam Harvey has concocted an outlandish solution

I am wearing a silver hoodie that stops just below the nipples. Or, if you prefer, a baggy crop-top with a hood. The piece - this is fashion, so it has to be a "piece" - is one of a kind, a prototype. It has wide square shoulders and an overzealous zip that does up right to the tip of my nose.

It does not, it's fair to say, make its wearer look especially cool. But that's not really what this hoodie is about. It has been designed to hide me from the thermal imaging systems of unmanned aerial surveillance vehicles - drones. And, as far as I can tell, it's working well.

"It's what I call anti-drone," explains designer Adam Harvey. "That's the sentiment. The material in the anti-drone clothing is made of silver, which is reflective to heat and makes the wearer invisible to thermal imaging."

The "anti-drone hoodie" was the central attraction of Harvey's Stealth Wear exhibition, which opened in central London in January, billed as a showcase for "counter-surveillance fashions". It is a field Harvey has been pioneering for three years now, making headlines in the tech community along the way.

Bizarro Earth

Three years after BP oil spill, USF research finds massive die-off

BP Oil
© Tampa Bay Times
The oil that spewed into the Gulf of Mexico during the Deepwater Horizon disaster three years ago killed off millions of amoeba-like creatures that form the basis of the gulf's aquatic food chain, according to scientists at the University of South Florida.

The die-off of tiny foraminifera stretched through the mile-deep DeSoto Canyon and beyond, following the path of an underwater plume of oil that snaked out from the wellhead, said David Hollander, a chemical oceanographer with USF.

"Everywhere the plume went, the die-off went," Hollander said.

The discovery by USF scientists marks yet another sign that damage from the disaster is still being revealed as its third anniversary looms. Although initially some pundits said the spill wasn't as bad as everyone feared, further scientific research has found that corals in the gulf died. Anglers hauled in fish with tattered fins and strange lesions. And dolphins continue dying.

The full implications of the die-off are yet to be seen. The foraminifera are consumed by clams and other creatures, who then provide food for the next step in the food chain, including the types of fish found with lesions. Because of the size of the spill, the way it was handled and the lack of baseline science in the gulf, there's little previous research to predict long-term effects.

The disaster began with a fiery explosion aboard an offshore drilling rig on April 20, 2010. It held the nation spellbound for months as BP struggled to stop the oil, but the spill has largely faded from national headlines. The oil is still there, though.

Weathered particles of oil from Deepwater Horizon are buried in the sediment in the gulf bottom and could be there for as much as a century.

"These are not going away any time soon," Hollander said.