Society's Child
The country's worst child killer will die in prison after she refused to attend her sentencing in what families described as "one final act of wickedness".
Letby, 33, was convicted by a jury of murdering seven babies and trying to kill six more while working at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit between 2015 and 2016.
At Manchester Crown Court on Monday, Mr Justice Goss said there was "premeditation, calculation and cunning in your actions" as he handed down a whole life order.
Addressing the nurse, he said: "You acted in a way that was completely contrary to the normal human instincts of nurturing and caring for babies and in gross breach of the trust that all citizens place in those who work in the medical and caring professions.
"The babies you harmed were born prematurely and some were at risk of not surviving, but in each case you deliberately harmed them, intending to kill them."
'Malevolence bordering on sadism'
Mr Justice Goss, who at times appeared emotional, added that Letby had abused the trust of parents who expected her to be caring for their children.
He added: "By their nature and number, such murders and attempted murder by a neonatal nurse entrusted to care for them is a case of very exceptional circumstances. This was a cruel, calculated and cynical campaign of child murder.
"There was a deep malevolence bordering on sadism in your actions.
"During the course of this trial, you have coldly denied any responsibility for your wrongdoing.
"You have no remorse. There are no mitigating factors."
Sentencing her to a whole life order for each offence, he said: "You will spend the rest of your life in prison."
More than a dozen relatives of Letby's victims sat in the public gallery for the hearing and eight jurors returned to see the sentencing.
Earlier, the court heard harrowing victim impact statements from the families of Letby's victims.
The mother of Child E, a premature-born boy who died, and Child F, his twin brother who survived, told the court the nurse's refusal to appear was "just one final act of wickedness from a coward".
The nurse was found guilty of murdering Child C by forcing air down a feeding tube and into the baby boy's stomach.
Referring to a handwritten note found at Letby's house, the baby's mother held back tears as she told the nurse in her absence: "At least now there is no debate that, in your own words, you killed them on purpose. You are evil. You did this."
Letby has become only the fourth woman in UK history to be told she will never be released from prison.
The others are include Myra Hindley, the girlfriend of Moors murderer Ian Brady, who died in 2002, and serial killers Rose West and Joanna Dennehy.
Following the sentencing, Det Ch Insp Nicola Evans said: "The sentence reflects the true scale and gravity of her horrific crimes and ensures that a calculated and dangerous individual is behind bars for a very long time.
"Nothing will bring back the babies who died or take away the pain and suffering experienced by all of the families over the years but I hope that the significant sentence will bring some comfort at this dark time.
"The victim impact statements read out in court today on behalf of the parents are a chilling reminder of the pain and suffering that each family has had to endure over the years.
"Hearing their own experiences in their own words has been truly heartbreaking."
Letby's parents did not turn up at court to see their daughter sentenced.
Susan, 63, and John, 77, attended Manchester Crown Court every day during the 10-month trial.
Early last week, when the jury reported the first guilty murder verdicts, Susan Letby broke down in court, crying out: "You can't be serious. This cannot be right."
She was still weeping as she left the courtroom and neither parent was in court last Friday, when the final guilty verdicts were handed down.
Reader Comments
Having worked on a research project for The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman into the NHS hospitals complaints process, I know that when something goes wrong in an NHS hospital, management and staff in general are just as likely to pin the tail on the nearest donkey as they are to shred documents and destroy files. Also, circumstantial evidence doesn't stack up.
When I started looking at the trial notes, I could barely see a case at all.... [Link]
Very strange!
Also...
Hospital cases are an absolute nightmare for the police.
They have had no medical training, have no basic understanding of how hospital equipment works, ward politics, etc, etc and are to a great extent reliant on what is handed to them by the hospital.
Stating the obvious here but a murder case like this is largely kabuki.
The NHS 'national treasure' schtick is largely kabuki.
Munchausen-syndrome-by-proxy good-girl-gone-bad is fantastic gold rush theatre for trashy Brit tabloid journalists.
Things go wrong in hospitals.
People die in hospitals.
it happens all day every day.
A fact that is not well understood by Great British Public
They will crucify anybody, that threatens, their belief system ideology, or their financial status, the persona s a person of good standing, but in reality, they are pathological deranged individuals.
To put simply. Wolf in sheep's clothing .
Within the NHS, if something goes wrong, it's usually the patients that get shafted.
Number one priority is always 'protect the hospital', so what they'll do towards that end, is if a patient decides to go through the hospital complaints process, NHS staff will shred documents, 'lose' files, drag the whole thing out for months and years, by which time the complainant is so weak, ill, tired or dead it seldom gets to reach a conclusion.
Also, The NHS have shit hot lawyers who can scare the crap out of a complainant and who can destroy a case in a trice.
One of the key things in their armoury though, is even after having been lied to, treated like trash, put through the gruelling NHS complaints process mill and having suffered the tortures of the damned throughout, NHS victims always 'still love The NHS', 'still believe in the NHS', etc, etc. It's like I love Big Brother total Stockholm Syndrome.
With something like the Letby case, the media and the public get whipped up into such a state of frenzied drunkenness on the spectacle of it all, they can't think straight, so it becomes very difficult for anyone to say anything that might contradict the official story, as all the red flags go up and they're immediately suspected of being a baby murderer's groupie or whatever.
"Oh those poor little ones!!! How could you!!!" etc.
I've got no idea whether Letby was guilty or not.
The case was such a bunch of bullshit, it's impossible to know.
It's also impossible to know if there were any crimes committed at all by anyone.
Letby certainly wasn't guilty beyond reasonable doubt though, and that was supposed to be the law in England the last time I looked.
Lucia de Berk (born 22 September 1961), often called Lucia de B., is a Dutch licensed paediatric nurse who was the subject of a miscarriage of justice. In 2003, she was sentenced to life imprisonment, for which no parole is possible under Dutch law, for four murders and three attempted murders of patients under her care. In 2004, after an appeal, she was convicted of seven murders and three attempted murders. Her conviction was controversial in the media and among scientists, and it was questioned by the investigative reporter Peter R. de Vries. In October 2008, the case was reopened by the Dutch Supreme Court, as new facts had been uncovered that undermined the previous verdicts. De Berk was freed, and her case retried; she was exonerated in April 2010... [Link]
[Link]
Link to the substack page
[Link]
Listening to the video brings up several questions that were never discussed at the trial and also her defence team, that were inadequate in preforming a satisfactory defence. I am left with the impression, she has been used as a scapegoat for the inadequacies of the management team the hospital, absolving the hospital of any blame or liability.
Hopefully a retrial will be granted, unfortunately as described at the closing of the video, it's all about money, something she does not have.