Dershowitz
© Yonkers TribuneAlan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz was on i24 News last night and said his new memoir is about "how much more difficult it is today" to defend Israel today than it used to be. That chore now includes defending Israel's new law making the country the "nation state of the Jewish people," in which only one people have the right of self-determination, Jews.
I think it was not a necessary law to pass. Look everybody knows Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people. If you want to pass a basic law, you just pass a law incorporating the brilliant declaration of independence of Israel, which talks about equal rights for all.

I don't think there was a need to have a basic law declaring what everybody knows. It only gives ammunition to the opposition.

People who think this will help in Israeli Diaspora relations are wrong.

Comment: What a litigious schmuck. 'Everybody knows' Israel is an ethnocentric apartheid state, but to put it in writing just gives the 'opposition' ammunition to confirm it. Better to just stand behind the fiction of 'equal rights for all' enshrined in the Israeli declaration of independence (even though 'everyone knows' that's not actually true). At least Dershowitz is honest. He's not actually concerned about 'equal rights'; he's concerned about being able to defend apartheid using legal fictions.


To do that, Get the rabbis out of marriage and the law, and who is a Jew, that's the way to improve Israel-Diaspora relations. But this law is "unnecessarily provocative" and "a mistake."
Look I don't think anybody doubts that Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people. Of course the criticism of it is hypocritical, coming from the Palestinians. They declare Palestine to be an Islamic state governed by sharia law, where no Jew can buy property or be a citizen. That's really racist. I mean, almost all the Arab countries are Muslim states. But I didn't see any reason for enacting this law on Israel's 70th anniversary. I think it was a mistake.

Dershowitz speaks for the centrist/liberal Israel lobby. The Israel lobby group the ADL also said that the law was unnecessary and would complicate Israeli-Diaspora relations:
"we are troubled by the fact that the law, which celebrates the fundamental Jewish nature of the state, raises significant questions about the government's long-term commitment to its pluralistic identity and democratic nature."
The liberal Zionist group J Street also said last week that the law was unnecessary and that Israel was "moving in an increasingly theocratic, authoritarian and xenophobic direction."
There was no need for this legislation: Israel was already a Jewish homeland.... And this government - along with every other government in Israel's history - already gave preference to the development of the Jewish population. Its main purpose appears to be shoring up Prime Minister Netanyahu's status with right-wing voters ahead of possible elections later this year or next.
The concern about relations between Israel and American Jews touches on a provision in the law under which Israel can interfere in Jewish life in the United States.
The state shall act to preserve the cultural, historical and religious heritage of the Jewish people among Jews in the Diaspora.
Times of Israel reports that the Finance Minister of Israel also regards the law as a "mistake" though he voted in favor of it.
"The legislation was done hastily," [Finance Minister Moshe] Kahlon said of the bill, passed last week, which his Kulanu party, as a member of the coalition, voted in favor of. "We made a mistake and we need to fix it."...

Kahlon indicated that commitments to coalition agreements played a significant role in gaining support for the bill, rather than ideology.
Kahlon said he and others, including Druze members of Knesset opposed to the law, were meeting with PM Benjamin Netanyahu to try to change the law, but reports are that Netanyahu is opposed to any changes.