© AP Photo
On October 21, 2017, Trump tweeted that he'd allow the "long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened." Just months later, conspiracy theorists and history buffs alike have their hands full with the latest and final release, which follows one release in December, one in mid-November and two releases in early November, and another release that came on October 26, just after the President signed the memo ordering them.
So far, Ted Cruz's father, Rafael Cruz, has not been implicated in the releases, as Trump had previously suggest he had played a role in the plot.
The October directive gave agencies seeking to appeal any releases until Tuesday to make their case. The administration announced Thursday that some 520 files will be be held until 2021 over national security concerns raised by the FBI, CIA and others, but the other 19,045 were released Thursday.
"I agree with the archivist's recommendation that the continued withholdings are necessary to protect against identifiable harm to national security, law enforcement or foreign affairs that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in immediate disclosure," Trump wrote Thursday.
Comment: There is a less than one percent chance that Trump actually read the files that have been kept classified. This story is a perfect example of the bogus nature of the idea of the POTUS as "commander-in-chief". Trump didn't decide to keep the docs secret because of "national security". He's just doing what he's told.
Documents released in 2017 reveal Lee Harvey Oswald was on a watch list of people whose mail was to be intercepted by federal agents before he killed Kennedy, but many of the releases have been irrelevant to the assassination.
It was also revealed that US President Lyndon B Johnson, Kennedy's Vice President, believed he was assassinated in retaliation for his order to kill South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem, who was executed earlier that same month in Saigon in a CIA-backed coup, which has only further fueled theories that Oswald was acting on behalf of a foreign government.
Other revelations stemming from Trump's October directive seem to contradict that theory, like the secret testimony to the House Select Committee on Assassinations from the former CIA station chief in Mexico City, David Atlee Phillips. He characterized Oswald as a "loony" and attested that he believed he acted alone. "God knows I would like for it to come out that Fidel Castro was responsible or that the Soviets were responsible," Phillips told the committee, adding, "but I know of no evidence to show that the Cubans or the Soviets put him up to it."
Comment: There's no evidence because it was elements within Western intelligence that were behind the assassination of JFK. See Laura Knight-Jadczyk's mult-part series on JFK.
"The American public doesn't want to believe that one man could murder Camelot," Phillips said, referring to the romantic nickname for Kennedy's all-star administration.
One thing is certain: theories will continue to fly until the release of the remaining 520 documents, as it is inferred they are the most sensitive. Even then, America may never stop debating one of its most troubling mysteries.
Reader Comments
The below is per recollection and I defer to those presenting details, links, evidence.
The term 'national security' was first used as a defense by Boeing (a USAF Contractor that built B-47s and similar passenger jets.)
There was some flaw with the planes (both military and civilian) and a USAF pilot told his wife that the AF wouldn't repair their problem which was the same or similar to that on civilian jets/planes. (Hydraulics?) He said if he died, that would be the problem.
His plane crashed; widow sued, Boeing (a major MIC player) which called in favors and got a US Attorney to swear, under oath, that revealing details would harm 'national security.' The courts bought it and threw the case out.
40? years went by and the files were 'declassified.' In same it was revealed that what the dead pilot had said was true, and what the US Attorney swore under oath so that Boeing could win the case was a FLAT OUT LIE.
Since then, *(especially under Bush*t II and Obysmal, the use of this same scam and multiplied exponentially.
I believe at least one other formerly classified until X date case like that has come up, and it too revealed that it had nothing to do with National Security and we have no reason to believe any claims of the US for secrecy re 'National Security" are flat out lies, as all that have been revealed thus far have been exactly that.
R.C.
noevery reason to believe any claims of the US for secrecy re 'National Security" are flat out lies, as all that have been revealed thus far have been exactly that.R.C.