© RT
The Russian Embassy has responded to reports in the
Times newspaper that claims "concerns are growing" about the Kremlin's influence in Westminster for the sole, simple reason that British MPs are appearing on RT.
As with any other British media outlet, RT UK invites politicians from across the political spectrum to speak freely on a wide variety of issues. However, the Murdoch-owned, right-wing
Times appears to have taken umbrage at this, 'naming and shaming' the Tory and Labour MPs who have appeared.
The Russian Embassy was quick to point out the Russophobia and hypocrisy of the Times' story, tweeting: "
@TheTimes: by appearing on RT, British politicians help Putin. Does it mean that by appearing on BBC Russian politicians help May?"
The embassy added: "[Journalist Dominic Kennedy] accuses RT of being one-sided, then tells Tory MPs not to voice their opinion there. Stylish."
While the
Times derides RT as "Putin's pet TV channel,"
it appears to forget its own reputation as a puppet of owner Rupert Murdoch, who stands accused of interfering with British government decisions.Following the general election in June, which saw Theresa May embarrassingly lose her party's absolute majority in the Commons, Murdoch faced allegations he had pressured the PM to reappoint now-Environment Secretary Michael Gove to the cabinet, or face bad press in his newspaper titles.
The Tories refused to directly respond to the claims.
Funnily enough, it was Gove who raised his "concern" this week about those MPs appearing on a "literal Kremlin propaganda channel."
While the newspaper is distressed by any perceived RT "influence," it has no problem pushing its true-blue agenda. In the lead-up to the general election, Murdoch told his employees at the
Sun and the
Times that the future of the company was dependent on the Tories winning the election, and told them to be more harsh on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, according to
reports.While the
Times raises its "concerns" about "Russia's influence at Westminster" wielded through RT, the newspaper clearly has a very short memory. The 2011/2012 Leveson inquiry into media standards and ethics in the UK revealed that Murdoch had been in close contact with every Prime Minister in recent decades, including Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and David Cameron.
The inquiry cast light on the inner workings of the Murdoch empire during the News of the World phone-hacking scandal.The 168-year-old tabloid was forced to close after it was revealed its journalists had hacked the voicemail of celebrities and VIPs including Prince William, and even of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler.
So Putin's approach is not retaliatory but still responds a sense of consequence to choices being made. The only way forward is for choices being made to be receognized as choices being made - but under the narrative dictates of a complex of un-owned or unwillingness to own fears - a deep state of dissociation demands allegiance via its coopted and invested agencies.
The good v evil narrative is not only unhelpful - unless identified in common - for finding a way that works for all is in everyone's interest. This doesn't mean business as usual - but the release of deceit. Deceits operate the one who thinks to use them. The 'West' has been undermined and coopted by deceit - regardless who by - the address of the remedy is to release the use of it. This does not mean pretending to be pure - it means willingness to extend and grow trust from where we currently are. The power is not in the overt political leaders of puppet regimes. But they do have to show allegiance or be marked out, smeared, put down, replaced penalized and etc. So I feel it important that RT hold integrity in every way that it may and anyone else hold the commuication open in whatever way they can - even if simply NOT joining in hate - of not just this issue - but any issue. For hate operates the thing it hates and accusers the other.