The Gateway Pundit reports...
The Clinton campaign participated in a conference call with the investigators in interest of challenging the election 2016 results.Gabriel Sherman at New York Magazine is reporting...
Donald Trump won the election with 306 electoral votes.
The far left computer scientists have no proof the election results were tampered with but are speculating the results in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated.
Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they've found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.Huma Abedin's sister Heba is encouraging her Facebook followers to lobby the Justice Department to audit the 2016 vote, in the hope that her sister can join Hillary in the Washington halls of power.
Comment: How ironic is it that it was Killary and her media lapdogs who were challenging Trump to accept the results of the election during presidential debates, but now that the shoe's on the other foot the Left wants to do exactly what they were saying Trump was going to do. Clearly the precious snowflakes on the Left never expected to lose and are now firmly entrenched in a confirmation bias to support their beliefs. They need to start accepting reality and deal with it instead of trying to find evidence of election rigging.
Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it's important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.
According to current tallies, Trump has won 290 Electoral College votes to Clinton's 232, with Michigan's 16 votes not apportioned because the race there is still too close to call. It would take overturning the results in both Wisconsin (10 Electoral College votes) and Pennsylvania (20 votes), in addition to winning Michigan's 16, for Clinton to win the Electoral College. There is also the complicating factor of "faithless electors," or members of the Electoral College who do not vote according to the popular vote in their states. At least six electoral voters have said they would not vote for Trump, despite the fact that he won their states.
The Clinton camp is running out of time to challenge the election...
Nate Silver however notes that the "scientific" claims of election impropriety may be hard to substantiate given the fact that Michigan uses paper ballots "everywhere"...
Of course, the real problem is they are Left-Wing Authoritarians, which means they'll follow whatever their left-wing authority tells them. Could be Clinton, more likely some TV comedian, or someone else who conflates other belief systems with oppression.