Syrian army soldier
© SANA / Reuters A member of forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad takes a position on a look-out point during their offensive to recapture the historic city of Palmyra in this picture provided by SANA on March 24, 2016.

Comment: The Obama administration recently announced the United States will be sending 250 special ops personnel to Syria for the purpose of providing intelligence, medical support and logistics to Arab fighters in northern Syria. The cover story is that these troops are being sent to fight ISIS, however, we know quite well that the U.S. has supported various terrorist organizations and off-shoots (a.k.a. 'moderate rebels') from the start. It's pretty easy to conclude that this effort will be more of the same. In other words, Obama is sending more troops to Syria precisely because Russia and the Syrian Army are winning the war.


Many have been critical of Obama's decision to deploy additional troops to Syria. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh told Democracy Now that he was "horrified" by the announcement, while former UN Assistant Secretary-General Hans-Christof von Sponeck referred to it as a "tragic "development" that could hamper the Geneva peace process.

"I do not understand why [Obama's] decided to jump into a war that [is] being won right now by the Syrian army and its allies, including Russia," Hersh said. "I can just speculate that our anti-Putin, anti-Russian instinct in America continues apace. That's all."

The journalist further praised Moscow's counterterrorism campaign in Syria. "The real winner in the last year or so of the war there has been the Russians. And the Russians - the bombing was much more effective," he noted. Russia has largely withdrawn its forces from Syria following a five-month-long limited engagement and has focused on pushing for a diplomatic resolution to the crisis.

However, Barack Obama's decision to increase the US military presence in Syria could adversely affect the Geneva peace process, von Sponeck noted, saying that the move is part of a "series of experiments" that Washington has conducted in the war-torn country and neighboring Iraq. These remarks came following Obama's Monday announcement that Washington would "deploy up to 250 additional US personnel in Syria including special forces." The move is ostensibly aimed at helping local forces to tackle Daesh, but von Sponeck offered a different explanation.

Obama "is entering his last six months and he wants to leave a legacy that shows some sign of success," he explained. If so, these experiments will hardly help to achieve this goal, but could instead contribute to ruining a country plagued by a foreign-sponsored insurgency for more than five years.

"The Americans are never short of an experiment, never short of trying something new," von Sponeck asserted. Washington "is jumping from one laboratory test to another, and in the meantime [Syria] continues to go further towards a destroyed nation."