The security situation in Europe and the world is the main theme of this interview, which you can watch below (with English subtitles):
Other topics discussed in the interview include:
Refugees:
- Libya, Syria, Ukraine: It's worse than we can imagine
- Syrian refugees in Europe, regime change in Damascus, and the mass migrations still to come
- 'ISIS among the refugees' - Prelude to another European "terror attack"?
- Holocaust 2.0: The ultimate decisions of conscience
- Holocaust 2.0: Coming soon!
© en.pilulerouge.comPolitical Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes
- Global Pathocracy, Authoritarian Followers and the Hope of the World
- Bizarro World
- Moral Endo-skeletons and Exo-skeletons: A Perspective on America's Cultural Divide and Current Crisis
Bucking the trend towards world domination under American hegemony, Russian president Vladimir Putin and his government seem to recognize this evil in the West and have not, therefore, succumbed to the virus of inhumanity and the complete lack of conscience that defines it. On the contrary, the Russian government defends itself against it, by fighting back.
While the politics of the so-called West works against the ordinary people of this world, Putin and his government are a shining example of the proper functions of a state and a leader: to serve the welfare of the people and not the interests of the power-hungry elite. Most Western politicians, on the other hand, have emphatically embraced extreme self-servitude.
By their fruits ye shall know them...
For those who prefer reading to watching videos, here is the full transcript of the show:
Jessyca: Hello and welcome to the SOTT Radio Show with the German SOTT Team. I'm Jessyca, this is Norman, this is Pashalis, and Jörg. Our guest today is Monika Donner. She is the author of the German book "God Bless You, Putin! A strategic analysis including a legal assessment of Europe, in terms of the security policy on the example of Austria."
Monika Donner is a lawyer in the Austrian Ministry of Defense and was formerly a military officer in the Austrian Armed Forces. She has also written an open letter to the Austrian National Council and the Federal Government to point out the blatant deficiencies in Europe and to help create the urgently needed awareness. Monika, a warm welcome and good to have you here.
Monika: Hello! Thanks for the invitation. Hello. Hello.
Jessyca: The first thing which catches everyone's eye when looking at your book is the title. Why did you choose the title "God Bless You, Putin!"?
Monika: In order to rectify the distortions presented by the mainstream media and in order to provoke a little.
Norman: That's already a pretty good start, since you've already provoked with this Title quite a bit. That's already visible with the
reactions of the media during your latest two interviews only -which we've all watched, of course.This question has always been coming up, since here in the West Putin indeed has become the bogeyman. I personally really like this title.
Monika: Thank you.
Norman: Because it gets your attention and you ask yourself: "Why? Why is she doing this? You can't do something like this"
Pashalis: You think: "I need to read this!"
Jessyca: Or: "But Putin is the evil one - why is God supposed to bless him now?"
Monika: Yes, and with that we're exactly at the crux. Of the so-called world powers -and the USA is not a world power but an empire. But the only one of the so-called world powers who is positively minded towards Europe, that's not Obama. It's Putin, it's Russia.
Norman: That's right.
Monika: Because Russia is a big, vast country with an extreme amount of resources, which doesn't need to put up with destabilizing us.That's how simple the truth is. The Americans are destabilizing everywhere because they need resources because they need to wage wars for their armament industry turned lunatic.
There are 700 military bases outside of their continent, which need to be fed. That's reality. You see, I'm not inventing anything new with the analysis. All I'm doing is proving scientifically, but in an understandable way, what everyone feels with their common sense, unless they've left it at home: That this is the truth. All I'm showing is "Yes, the emperor is naked." The West - us - we are not the good ones.
Jessyca: That's right.
Norman: In your book you have clearly worked out seven key statements and the first one is:
"World War III is looming because of Ukraine and because of the Middle East conflict."
That's a little difficult for the average viewer to understand, why of all things should these two regions be responsible for a looming 3rd World War.Could you elaborate a little?
Monika: Yes. One indication is that the mainstream media hardly reports about Ukraine anymore, they report only about the stream of refugees. And if you're looking closer, there's a war being prepared around Ukraine.The west positions itself, there are rocket bases, there's military infrastructure, which is being supported and built by the US and the so-called west.There are high readiness, i.e. very rapid deployment forces, are being stationed right around the Russian range of influence. And prior to this, NATO has been expanding massively and encircling Russia. It's not the other way around. Although it's legitimate that the former Soviet states or Baltic states are joining NATO, but in 1990 when the Berlin Wall fell, Russia had been promised the exact opposite.
It was said that there wouldn't be a NATO expansion east of Germany, there wouldn't be stationing of troops east of Germany. And this promise was already broken in the very moment it was being made: Successively, bit by bit and without involving Russia into the necessary talks. You can't do that...
Jessyca: That's right.
Jörg: The most recent example for this is Ramstein and the atomic bombs.
Monika: Yes, completely absurd. What's up with that?
Norman: We don't want any nuclear weapons in our country, no way...
Pashalis: Especially no American ones!
Norman: No, no, we don't need them!
Monika: Yes, exactly, we don't need them. That's what they say publicly. And yet there's atomic energy in the country and nuclear weapons. Well, swell! Do the people want that?Has anyone ever asked the people?
Jessyca: Of course not, as usual. They don't ask.
Norman: Pashalis, haven't you written an article recently about the NATO bases and how over time they've been grouping around Russia?
Pashalis: Yes, I have, right. And of course it's completely obvious that Russia has been closing in on NATO. Officially.
Norman: Yes, but they haven't done it in one go. Step by step they went into the countries asking "Can we build a base here?." And then they closed in on Russia step by step and if you take a look at the world map now, you can clearly see how the NATO bases are stationed around Russia and surely, that's no aggressive policy at all.
Monika: Not at all!
Jessyca: Most of all, with this one image of where the NATO bases are stationed you can quickly show people who the real aggressor is...
Monika: Yes, yes, and in Ukraine as well. It's not only about the military organisational structure that's being built around Russia by NATO. De facto it's also that the West having evidently been destabilizing Crimea. Last autumn 8 CIA officers wrote an open letter to your Mrs. Merkel- open bracket: whose profession is unknown to me, bracket closed. According to this letter it's been the West, i.e. the US destabilizing Crimea.
The snipers were hired by the West.The alleged peaceful protesters, who in fact were aggressive idiots, had been hired, paid, trained, etc. by the West. And the open letter by the 8 CIA officers clearly corresponds with irrefutable video footage from Switzerland. I think it was "klagemauer.tv" who aired that. They were on site, filming how the executive forces in Crimea were being harassed for hours by these terrorists, those weren't protesters, those were terrorists.They were attacked with tear gas, they were attacked with rocks, beaten with sticks, incendiary agents were thrown at them.You can see how police officers are burning.
And only when the executive forces were being pushed to the wall, just like I'm doing it here, only then did they begin with a legitimate defence: With self-defence. And that's the very sequence which our western de-education media have been airing and presenting us as "evidence" of how aggressive the executive forces were. So they lied to us, cold like ice...
Pashalis: Yes, it was reported completely out of context.
Monika: Yes, completely out of context.
Jörg: In the video it was also reported that the protesters were paid, these brutal protesters and that lots of money was flowing into the embassy.The protesters were paid so that they'd behave aggressively, so they wouldn't demonstrate for their country, but were there only because of the money.
Pashalis: Exactly.
Monika: And that corresponds with the statement of the 8 CIA officers. As is well known, the CIA is the US intelligence service and if you ignore that, don't take this the wrong way, then something is amiss with this world.
Some time after that, there has been a US resolution, which stated over many pages how evil the Russians are and then it was recommended to increase the sanctions against Russia. Taking Ukraine into NATO despite the escalation, that was in November 2014 I think, and in January of this year the EU passed a resolution. It's basically a copy-paste of the American text and the same idiocy was decided upon, even though there is this open letter to Merkel.
To his credit, US senator Ron Paul has shown what it is - I think he's a Congress legend, a good man. In my view Ron Paul is like the Gregor Gysi of the USA. I value Gysi a lot. And Paul said this was a declaration of war to Russia. It happened in a similar way in Iraq where no weapons of mass destruction were found despite the official claims. Similar procedure. And he said that if this isn't taken back he's one of the statesmen who like Gorbachev and Helmut Schmidt are warning of the third world war in terms of Ukraine. These are statesmen. We aren't talking about decals or jumping-jacks, but those 3 are people of caliber. Gorbachev, Schmidt and Paul.
Norman: You'd think these men know of what they're talking about...
Monika: Yes, and the CIA also knows what they're talking about. Same for high-ranking military men. But our political performers also know what they're talking about. That's the script that is submitted to them, probably right along with the bribe or the death threat. One of these two.
Norman: Quite true.
Pashalis: Blackmail.
Norman: Yes that's so typical. Without pressure you don't get people to follow along. You've have to put them under pressure with money or threats, it doesn't work any other way.
Pashalis: Exactly.
Monika: Exactly. Or it's sexuality, which hasn't been outed yet and then that's what they use as leverage. It's the same thing in the Church. They do love priests who do something that's against the rules in terms of sexuality, because then you can say "Yeah,ok, we're having your back, but you do exactly as we want you to do."
Jessya: Exactly.
Jörg: What do you think is the reason that the US has a problem with Russia? Is that only because of geopolitical reasons or could there be more to it in your opinion?
Monika: There's a strategy behind it, which is over 100 years old and it's called: The US wants to drive a wedge between Europe and Russia, and especially between Germany and Russia, since they don't have the human material,don't have the human masses, in order to deregulate and destabilize on-site.They have to drive a wedge.That worked out in the 1st World War, that worked out in the 2nd World War and if it's working out again, we'll have the 3rd World War. And clearly that's a strategy, which was also explicitly mentioned as such by George Friedman from Stratfor, thus USA. They even say what strategy they have..
Jessyca: And nothing happens!
Monika: It's the same idiotic procedure like currently in Europe, where IS, i.e. in my view USIS- USA-s-IS, circa USIS - that's how it should actually be defined, where the Islamic State already talks about the strategy of how they're going to destabilize Europe, i.e. by purposefully steered refugee streams, in which they are planting terrorists,sleepers and organised criminals, and still nobody is doing any check-ups.
In Austria for example, I've also been at the border in Nickelsdorf for the second time already: The border
between Austria and Hungary. I was there yesterday and we filmed. We went there with two camera teams and two Arabic translators. We had conversations with the on-scene commander and the police, and he confirmed to us that not a singlerefugee is being checked, not a single one registered and there's not a single list of names. Right on the Austrian territory these people, among whom there's a minimal percentage of terrorists, they get on cabs and drive around as they like. There are hundreds of cabs at the border and they get on. I mean, what's up with that?
Pashalis: Yes. Do you think that's coincidence or is there a strategy behind it?
Monika: From my point of view it's treason. It's treason on the republic and of the population. It's deliberately putting the population at risk, or at least doing so in a grossly negligent way. The constitution is being questioned,is being endangered. Security is being endangered. What they do is indirectly provoking civil wars because people are going to revolt.
And the idiots are going to say:"All foreigners are bad" and the extreme rightists will probably assault all foreigners and the extreme leftists will go for the rightists and then we're getting into a hell of a mess. They're just looking at it,they're letting it happen, because maybe it even strengthens the EU, right. Maybe those European troops can be deployed, which are already secretly more or less publicly functioning as border control troops and with the USA's support. And then perhaps we're soon having the United American-European States...the American saviour arrives again...
Pashalis: And that's exactly what we want, eh?!
Norman: Yes, yes!! That's exactly what we want!
Monika: Absolutely, absolutely! I do need such a Wonderbra on my head and McDonald's and French Fries inside here instead of a brain so as to keep me under control.... Nah, honestly, they can kiss my ass!
Norman: Monika, I have a specific question to you concerning Germany and Russia, also with respect to this refugee crisis.Within the past two, three weeks we could observe - that was even slightly apparent before the refugee crisis - that while Merkel is hiding, she is still, if you're looking closer, she's moving a little towards Russia.
Pashalis: At least it seems so...
Norman: At least it seems so. And of course we're wondering what's going to happen if Germany is indeed seeking to be shoulder-to-shoulder with Russia and at some point even publicly. What do you believe will the US do? In Germany we're still operating under occupational law. Would they go as far as to play this card here in this country?
Monika: Beliefs are the job of the Church. My analysis concludes that Germany should go for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Russia, and I recommend it to Germany just like I recommend it to Austria, precisely in order to breakthrough the old strategy. But first the German people must finally give themselves- and with their free decision -a real constitution according to the constitution's section 146. There is the occupational law,i.e. a quasi-constitutional, which somehow continues to be valid, and which has to be quashed, as well as the section 120, where it's written that Germany has to cover the occupation costs. I mean, that's crazy! You're under occupation and even have to pay the money for it.
The population is being fooled around with endlessly. So you'd first have to create a real constitution with the constitution and in it enshrine that Germany is neutral, taking Switzerland as a model. Please don't take Austria as a model just yet, since until now we aren't really neutral, it's in name only. It's being quasi-handled.
The Viennese solution is:"Nothin's gonna' happen." So where you Germans say "World War is breaking out, it can't go on like this", we in Vienna say "Nothing is going to happen, it'll be alright." We aren't really neutral, so you should take Switzerland as a model. It would reasonably work for the neutrality, which Germany should have. Establish a strong army and make sure to get the US nuclear weapons out of the country and that there aren't anymore occupation troops. Then it would almost be a compulsion forthe other European states to follow along. Taking this model, NATO would be superfluous.
NATO is already superfluous, but it would be the first step towards dissolution of NATO. It doesn't have a right to exist anymore anyway, at least no right to exist under international law. And then shoulder-to-shoulder with Russia. Have Russia join the EEA, the European Economic Area, or have them right in the EU, why not? A strong Eurasia, a strong Europe. That's what Putin wants, that's what we want - allegedly. Then there's a strong Europe or Eurasia,then there's a strong China, then there's a strong USA. Then we'll have a balance of power, or at least an initiation of a balance of power. Then there's an end to globalization. For now.
Jessyca: Then of course the question arises, in what extent is it realistic to achieve this coming from the political level, i.e. to what extent politicians are even willing to really go into this direction. If you look at how the US is using lots of threats so as to make their vassals do what they want them to do. That is, the question is whether we'd rather have to focus on informing people, because we have a de facto information and disinformation war going on via the media and what's being promulgated in the public.
Monika: Yes.
Jessyca: I think that the political level... that the focus is probably better put on the people themselves. It has to come from them, because otherwise it'll just keep going on like it always has.
Monika: I really like that, thanks, Jessyca. You see, I'm an advocate of revolution only as an ultima ratio, i.e. it should only be used as a last resort. Because moving from one shitty situation into the next, isn't exactly intelligent and as you rightly say, the change must come from within and that's what I call rebellion. Since there's a war being waged against the soul, because the soul yearns for truth, the soul yearns for authenticity. The human being yearns fora comprehensible truth, for true media coverage.
So it's important, as you say,to spread the truth, to offer information. But then everyone has to extrapolate for themselves what they want to do with it, and that's the change coming from within. I'm working in the Ministry of Defense and I was an army officer. My assignment to myself, the assignment I've given to myself, is to bring light into this matter. I cannot expect that from a shoe salesman. He can pass the information on to others. Perhaps a citizens' movement will be initiated, which will demand from parliament: "So? What's up with Monika Donner's analysis, when are you all going to act according to it?"
These would be possibilities. So everyone can contribute their share and even if it's only taking over an organizational role within a movement, which is taking to the streets. While taking to the streets, well, it's good, only you'd have to reach the critical mass. And I'm not talking about storming a parliament, that's of no use, that would be a revolution. But igniting a mental wildfire. And we won't reach that point with"I like" clicks on Facebook and other such machinations of self-portrayal. Nothing's going to happen this way. That's a one-way street, where a few people are shoving their weight around. But taking the important things from within and acting them out externally, that's what each has to decide for themselves.
Norman: That's right. In your sixth thesis you address a pretty interesting topic. You're pleading for massively strengthening the national army. If you compare the numbers you've mentioned there with reality, of course it's a joke in terms of how the army is currently looking and how it should have looked according to your analysis. It's about a massive strengthening. For me personally it was a little alienating in the beginning.
I don't care much about the military, I did community service and told myself "Nah, leave me alone with your military." But you're addressing the topic of militia, that the main part of the military in Austria has to consist of citizens in uniform and locally close to their living environment. As a protective measure against the state coming along saying: "Please, you shoot this guy over there" and the soldier saying: "No, that's my fellow countryman,no way, I ain't gonna shoot him!"
Monika: Yes, exactly.
Norman: And I think that's a really important thing, because with the idea of the European army you see that foreign forces are to be used to go against the population and to shoot at them if necessary. With a strong army consisting of civilians, who have a connection to their country, this is of course much harder to enforce. Initially, this idea alienated me somewhat, but I've thought it through a little and I think there is something to it and that we should also discuss it.
Monika: That was exactly the idea of Austrian constitutional legislator. They said that the army should consist of a small percentage of career soldiers and the major part should consist of militia. Not only because it's cheaper, but also so regional soldiers will fight for the people and not against them. As I said, it's cheaper, it's easy to set up. We've already had plans for a military mobilization of 300.000 men. However, the budget was never provided for it, in order to adequately equip them. If the state, the government doesn't do this, they neglect their most important and primary task, which is to guarantee security.
Jessyca: The security of their own people, the populace.
Monika: Of the populace, yes exactly. If you're a neutral state you need to have a strong army, because if you have a small army, not only is there the danger of being overrun more easily, or that the state territory is being used as evasion area for foreign maneuvers. You also want to be able to stop this. There's also the possibility that the government says: "Hey, our army is so small,we'll affiliate with NATO." If you think logically, it's clear that NATO leads wars against international law, NATO destabilizes, NATO killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
Pashalis: At least.... if not millions...
Monika: If not millions.... Not only does this fuel so-called terrorism, which of course is nothing but an answer to the terrorism of NATO, only difference is the means and this again is being supported by the US and NATO. So what they've done is to bring aspiral of terror into the world. Just like Volker Pispers says, they've created a cupboard terrorist, whom they can get out and put back in again according to their needs, so they can destabilize everywhere.
Since we've just talked about the people, the wave of destabilization in Europe shows how Europe's peoples are to be destroyed. Well, not necessarily obliterating them, but destroying their identity. Because if you've broken the peoples' identity then there are no peoples who can rise up against globalization. That's the aim.
Jessyca: The old strategy...
Pashalis: No unity anymore.
Jörg: Divide and conquer.
Monika: Divide and conquer... divide and conquer... divide et impera...
Norman: Even Joschka Fischer has written about this in his memoirs, in his strategy book a couple of years ago. He explicitly wrote that Germany needs to be diluted from within via immigration and that the German identity must dissolve. That's what he wrote openly in his book.
Pashalis: And he was from the Green party!
Norman: Yes he was a green guy. That's a bummer.
Monika: Yeah, the Green party. What has that got to do with nature? Artificially initiating a process which doesn't really do humanity any good. I have nothing against the so-called mixing of races, which doesn't exist anyway,it's a silly word anyway. If you look around the animal world, pure bred dogs die much earlier. Crossbreeds live longer, are cleverer, too. I'm not against a certain percentage of foreigners.
But if we're in a situation now, where all the aims, which, thank god,feminism has reached are being endangered, and what courageous Europeans have accomplished, i.e. the separation from the Church, at least a somewhat removal of the bigoted rules of the Church: all the accomplishments to make people freer, if that's at stake now because of radical Islamists, who're maybe running around with butcher's knives, and putting people like me at risk: I'm a transsexual lesbian. So the lesbians, gays, who allegedly should be protected along with feminists, who're being put at risk, along with foreigners, who've come to us to Europe,precisely for the reason to0 flee from these psychopathic assholes, who come here undercover and partly enter the country legally, then I must say that there must be a scheme behind it. Whoever fails to notice that must have been slamming their head against a wall, there's no other way I can imagine why it should not be noticed.
Jessyca: There's an interesting article called "Germany's citizens in La-la-land". The sheeple, who are running around in their hamster wheel every day,doing their jobs, and they block out everything else.
Monika: Yes, people, who believe they're free because they have an iPhone or another type of device on their ear, with which they can unnerve others on the subway. People, who're slaves while believing they're free -those are the ideal slaves.
Jessyca: Yes, exactly.
Monika: And those are the ones, who along with all the others are being led to the slaughterhouse. This danger exists and it needs to be taken seriously. Because it has been announced and it's partly been implemented already. My assessment is that as soon as the Trojan Horse is inside Europe, i.e. as soon as the necessary manning level has arrived here, only then there will be acts of terrorism, otherwise we'd close all the borders too early. So little by little they'll let in more people- in the worst case.
Hopefully it's going to play out differently,I'm only describing a thinkable scenario. We're dealing with sick brains after all, so one has to think the way they do: Psychopaths. Psychopaths, utter psychopaths, who're probably even indifferent towards the lives of their own families. Not everybody can run away to the Canary Islands or to Scotland or wherever.That doesn't work for the mere reason of the logistics. So what we're dealing with here is psychopaths and followers, and you have to think in the way they think.
So the Trojan Horse could be pushed in any time now and then it really starts. Certainly not with large operative units, but with small very well equipped units, which will strike guerilla-wise and weaken the system step by step, including attacks on barracks, on governmental institutions and on civilians. All I can say is people should prepare themselves. Nobody's supposed to be in panic.
Strength lies in calmness. Preparing oneself, seeing it as a hobby.Our ancestors, our Germanic-celtic ancestors, they were masters of beheading, they saw it as a hobby. So yeah, simply preparing oneself and then see what's going to happen. Perhaps having a little water purification device at home. Can't hurt to have firearms. Can't hurt to have stabbing weapons, to have sufficient food stored away. Being prepared. And if nothing happens, then we'll take all this stuff and make a camping trip in two, three years to come. But being prepared, can't hurt.
Jessyca: But if we summarize this, then what we have here is a repeating of history. Scapegoats are being fabricated and what before was people's compassion and their willingness to help refugees, that come from war areas as a result of NATO aggression, can very easily be switched around to hatred by deliberately fabricating this scapegoat. Now of course the question is if we're facing a rerun of history, then those who're speaking the truth are part of this fabricated scapegoat group. What do you think? Do you see yourself in danger if you're"sticking your neck out" the way you do?
Monika: Well, they've given me the Nazi label, because I was on a TV show called "Valid Voice"- the name says a lot already -with IMO one of the best cabaret artists in the world, since he addresses incisive topics, Roland Düringer. In this show I allegedly made Nazi statements. Everyone who's seen the show knows that's absolute horse-hockey. It's the exact opposite of what I said,it's only about defaming me, because they can't refute the content of my analysis.
Of course my analysis had repercussions already before they brought up the Nazi allegations: In the National Council but also in the military staff of the Austrian Armed Forces. There are changes going on here,which certain people don't like. That's why they're doing the Nazi mud-slinging. If you're asking whether I'm in fear of my life, that's what resonated in your question,did I understand that correctly?
Norman: Partly, yes. Since from history we know of accidents and people vanishing because they said something wrong and of course we were already wondering whether you've been thinking about the idea...
Jessyca: Or, whether you're taking any precautionary measures or with new contacts, you're looking closer: "Are these people trustworthy or not; are they only pretending to be supporting me...? "
Pashalis: Or: "Perhaps they're having other plans behind my back that differ from those they profess outwardly?"
Monika: You're asking really great questions. That's like - how do they call it in football? A field goal served on a silver platter!
Pashalis: You can shoot now!
Monika: Nah. I've been proceeding strategically, of course.That is, the TV show was aired one week after my analysis had been distributed extensively to all the regional and federal politicians, to the president of the National Council, etc. If somebody would want to eliminate me, then my analysis would carry even more weight than it already does.
Pashalis: Exactly.
Monika: That is, the people, who've tried to defame me with the Nazi label walked right into my trap and not the other way around.
Norman: That's of course a very good strategy. We at SOTT.net drafted a letter last year called Dearputin.com. That's a website which has been translated into 19 different languages. We've written a letter to Putin. Since then, there's been a hell of a lot ofattacks on SOTT and the SOTT groups. But these attacks alone have led to a real media presence.
Monika: Great!
Norman: How many signatures have we collected?
Pashalis: I think around 70 000.
Norman: Something around 70,000 already and it's growing steadily. So they're shooting themselves in the foot real nicely there!
Pashalis: Yes!
Monika: I think that's just wonderful! That's great, that's good. Because by shooting themselves in the footit might occur to them "Ouch, that hurts!" And maybe they'll start thinking differently or instinctively start acting differently, since, after all, we're dealing with single-cell organisms here.
We're dealing with those who're making professional powerful use of their brainstem, who probably have no idea whatsoever of the existence of a cerebrum and a heart, because they've never made use of it. But I've proceeded in the same way. The Nazi label came and since I abolished compulsory operation for transsexuals in Austria at the constitutional court - i.e.,not I did, but the constitutional court passed that transsexuals don't have to get operated anymore for changing their marital status documents, because that's against human rights. That had repercussions in Germany. Due to the verdict in Austria, they've adopted it in Germany since 2011.That led to a media hype.
The people, who wanted to defame me because of my Putin book have overlooked that I already had good media contactsand my reaction to the Nazi label was that I activated my media contacts. As I have planned, I took the forward defense to show what's happening here, how bizarre it all is. This led to media attention. Almost all print media, even the mainstream mediareported positively about me. Of course, alternative media reported in a much more intense and better researched way, the alleged 'rightists'. I can't see anything 'rightist' when somebody is dedicated to the truth.Or maybe I can, I don't know?
That's what made the book a bestseller. It wasn't planned to label me a Nazi. You can't plan that sort ofthing in a perfect way. But they've done me a big favor with it. Of course it did hurt me.This dilettantish simpleminded way, wanting to label me a Nazi for something I haven't done,that did hurt tremendously of course. So, I did cry, it was unpleasant.
What I can advise everyone, though,who's experiencing such a thing: Have a good cry, then develop rage toward those who've done it and then comes the power to take the right steps in a calm and level-headed way. Don't suppress the feelings, but don'tact while under influence of these feelings. But look at what's going on there and then pull all the threads you have and suddenly all sorts of possibilities open up. People from all walks of life suddenly approach you that support you and I'm well protected. I'm very well protected,I have a very good network. I have almost a full army standing behind me.
Pashalis: Wonderful!
Jessyca: Very nice!
Monika: Only, the people attacking me,they don't get it, I don't give a damn. I'm not afraid and even if there was somebody who- which would be real bizarre -who'd want to make me a martyr, even if they'd do that, I'm not afraid of death. To me, death is an illusion. In 2012 I had a near death experience and since then I know that what I've written about in my previous books is true. We do have a soul. And if they eliminate me, then I'll be back, twice as pesky as before, to kick their asses twice and thrice as much. It is as simple as that: Retoure...
Jörg: I also wanted to ask whether you have a good network, since that's absolutely witty, uhmm not witty... but it's vital to have people around whom you can trust and with whom you can talk. If you're all alone, you're lost. Especially when it comes to these things.
Monika: Yes, I have a very good network and this can indeed be witty. It is vital, Jörg, yes, and at the same time it can also be humorous, because you can also have fun with the matter. Sometimes you also need to be able to laugh about it, not everything is a conspiracy. But of course there is a conspiracy. After all you can analyse it and then you can clearly see it. But the mass of people, who're unconsciously taking part in this conspiracy, simply are willing idiots, who take part in it, because they see a personal profit for themselves in it, because they want to feed their ego, because they're blind towards certain circumstances, because it's more comfortable.
Because as political impersonators they've been licking arses for 20 years, so as to reach the position they're in now and as a "rationally thinking person" you would want those 20 years of arse-licking to pay off for you, so you can make use of it now. Giving a crap what happens to their children. As we said, we're dealing with psychopaths here, or with rather non-reflecting people. That is comical, that's a theatre. No animal is as stupid as human beings. That's how it is. That is, no other animal is as... sorry. Since, according to Darwin humans are also animals.
Only, homo sapiens, that's not correct. We aren't wise after all, nor knowing. The masses are, well, homo... a homo occupatus, an artificially busy human being, who thinks of himself as so important and doesn't get what's going on around him. They say Putin is evil.They say Muslims are evil. And you are good, dear homo occupatus, dear idiotic faithful little slave. Be happy to have your cellphone. Be happy about having your McDonald's muck. Be happy about having all this BS on TV that you can watch and be happy that you have a toilet where you can get rid of it all again. Be happy, yes.
That's the strategy and if people are participating in it, then it's them who are responsible for it. They are responsible when they aren't sensing that something's going wrong here. You can only try to help by offering different information to them. Once we start saying. Ok,they're bonkers anyway, after all, I've seen how the aluminium planes flew into the 2 steel towers there in America, one of them even stuck out the other side of the tower. These were steel skeleton towers. Of course they'll then collapse in free fall!
Pashalis: Yes of course, in free fall!?!
Monika: And the World Trade Center building 7,which is 147 Meters high, next to the towers without...
Jessyca: That was clearly the pressure wave!
Monika: It was the pressure wave, yes! So, of course that's clear; sarcasm on -for the less reflected viewer I'm switching to sarcasm mode now. The pressure wave, which probably came from spaceship Enterprise with a photon torpedo or something like that, that's what made WTC 7 collapse in free fall. Somehow that was a really sad thing for the Americans to happen and then, unfortunately, they had to- since in fact they never wanted to go on an oil raid.
Pashalis: No, of course not!
Monika: And they didn't want to destabilize the Arabic states in order to strengthen Israel, that's not what this is about at all, you know.They were simply forced to bring peace and democracy to Iraq. Now Iraq is one of the happiest countries ever...
Pashalis: Totally!
Monika: Yes, totally! There are hardly any corpses and hardly any mutilated humans, everything is alright. Sad to say it, but they had to do it. The US have sacrificed themselves and have turned things to the better for all of us. Sarcasm off.
Norman: You said that very well.
Pashalis: You could not have said it any better, spot on.
Monika: Perhaps now people will understand it,whose approach is humor.
Jessyca: Maybe.
Monika: Maybe they'll say "Well, OK, that does sound a little bizarre what she said there. Let's have a think if this woman from Austria, who's throwing her weight around on a German channel, whether maybe there could be something correct to what she said there. Let's see."
Jessyca: Coming back again to provable conspiracy strategies, when you look at Putin, do you see similarities to John F. Kennedy?
Monika: Yes, yes. But let me say first, that I can't and don't want to exclude the possibility that perhaps Putin himself is apuppet of the New World Order. It could be. It's of no interest to me, though. What's important to me is that we are mediating between East and West, and what's important to me is that what he says is 99,9% true, it's verifiable, it's scientifically verifiable.Opposed to what the so-called West claims about Putin and Russia, which is complete BS. That's verifiable.
Whether he's a puppet of the NWO, is, as I said, possible. However, I don't tend to think so. When I hear him talk then I already sense that it's true what he says. That's a first feeling, everyone has it. Hopefully we won't let anyone take it away from us, this first feeling. This first feeling is something that the majority of good lawyers are listening to and then they analyze it with their brains: "Is my feeling accurate or is it not accurate?" Every scientist does this. Whether he's being paid or not. Everyone has an impression and either they follow it or they don't.
And Putin - now I'm answering your question specifically -to me he has the qualities of John F. Kennedy. He addresses things openly and he also acts according to them, and he was not the one, who wanted to come into power. He came into power more or less by coincidence and he's a person who saw what happened to the Soviet Union. He was a secret service officer.
Pashalis: He was right in the middle of it,
Monika: He was right in the middle of it, with a big code of honor. He's from a working-class family. In my view he is a highly decent person, who is also a lawyer and as I said,he came into power without wanting it. And those are very dangerous people.
Because they thought that this little inconspicuous Putin,"we oligarchs are going to turn him now the way we want him" and he beat the living daylights out of them so they didn't know anymore whether they were male or female.
Doesn't have to be a bad thing though, if you don't really know, of course. But once the bulbs have burned through, then you know who the real factor of danger is. And that's not Putin. He has made his country strong.They have a currency. As far as I know the ruble is tied to the gold value. They have hardly any debts. He has brought the oil and gas reserves back into Russia's hands. They're on the verge of separating from the Federal Reserve-federal'... that alone isn't correct anyway, it's a private bank after all, a fu**ing', sorry, not fu**ing, I didn't want to say...
Pashalis: A frigging...
Monika: A frigging bank which is dictating the money value in the entire world. So apparently Russia is currently detaching itself from them, which is of course one reason for all this rabble-rousing against Russia. So Putin has done a whole damn lot for his country! And presenting him now as a dictator, that's the most stupid and dumbest thing of all!
That's what those western financial dictators do: I "love this word." They are capitalist fascists, who don't like to see that there's a president who thinks of his people and his country first. And if we suffer a bit more in Europe, apparently it still needs a little moredegree of suffering for the masses. Then the masses will realize that Russia a) is not our enemy, but that USA, ISIS, NATO are co-responsible for the conditions we're having here: and b) that Russia, via Putin, has become a rich and fairly healthy, sustainable country, i.e. a federation. He's doing good things. And that's hurting those, who're more or less damaging their own people.
Norman: That's right. There's a nice saying, which goes like this: By their fruits you shall know them...
Pashalis: Oh yes!
Norman: And there's a good author called Naomi Klein, who's written the book 'The Shock Doctrine'.
Pashalis: Do you know it, yes?
Monika: Yes.
Norman: There, she describes really well, how back in Gorbachev's times, there was the Chicago School of Economics. Their guys immigrated into the country and they really did wicked things to the economy. The economy fell into a grave crisis, lots of suffering was created, many deaths, torture, persecution, destruction. And if you now look back at these times then you see what Putin did after he came into power: he fired those people, he simply turned around privatization, he simply kicked them out!
Monika: Yes!
Norman: And if you're saying now that this man has accomplished what all the other small countries, whose dictators were being elected and countries robbed by these Chicago boys ,that they didn't accomplish it in Russia, then this man, who has done it, really deserves respect, I think.
Pashalis: Definitively!
Monika: He's got so much heart and so much brains, that until now he hasn't deferred to NATO's provocations. If Russia wanted, there would be Russian troops with ca. 25,000 tanks at the Rhine, in no time. He did not answer the provocations, till now. He was also asked for help by Crimea, that's being overlooked, you see.
Pashalis: Absolutely right.
Monika: And he answered the call for help. Intelligently, he sent non-combatants, i.e. he sent people, who are soldiers, but he put them on leave of absence during that time. I.e. there haven't been any legitimate Russian combatants involved in the conflict but soldiers on leave. That is: non-Russian combatants fought. That's how he kept open negotiations with NATO. You can not do that more cleverly!
Our single-cell organisms in Western Europe consider this as aggressive. They also believe they can convey to us -if Crimea's population confirms the referendum from May last year and 91% of Crimea's population say "The referendum was fair" and 88% of the population say: "Please, dear government, we want to stay with Russia." Then they want to tell us that this isn't OK?? The poll was done by PEW Research, so it's from the US. The people decided and that's legitimate. In terms of international lawthis is no case of annexation. Russia did not break international law with it, this is a legitimate lawful secession: Crimea's secession from Ukraine, is a legitimate alignment to the Russian Federation. Period, full-stop, finish!
If Western pseudo lawyers and pseudo politicians, i.e. political impersonators, are twisting this around then what this shows is what they wish for, but not the reality. Reality is what Putin said on TV and also what he told a couple of reporters. That's verifiable, it can be verified in a juristic way. Anyone with two neurons firing should go check it for themselves.
In the analysis "God bless you, Putin" I have listed all the sources. Everyone can easily click on the links in the eBook and then find out: "Is it true what Monika Donner is saying there?" The readers can assess for themselves whether I'm some sort of looney,who's in love with Putin. That means, a transsexual lesbian being in love with Putin! You'd really need to start thinking about it, what's going on there. Either I'm completely bonkers and naive, or maybe I've seen through things, possibly seen how things truly are. That's what people must decide for themselves, I can't make this decision for them.
Norman: We've prepared another question that's interesting to us and especially to our German viewers. If you study history, it's in fact always the same process of how a state turns into a dictatorship. It's being prepared slowly, the police state is being built up in a hidden way, until some incidents make people feel so cornered that at some point they'll accept this closed state. Since we're sitting right in the middle of Europe and Germany is more or less right in it, how do you see it from outside as an Austrian?
Monika: Well, Austria is no enchanted land either. Perhaps it's a little easier for us because at least formally, Austria is neutral. And because we Austrians are such a strange Alpine nation, who also often live in the lowlands. We're somewhat like the Hobbitsin this whole story. We have our Shire and are happy to have our peace. Our politicians know that, too. They know that there was Andreas Hohweil in Austria, who thoroughly defeated the Bavarians and the French three times with his peasant uprising. Crushingly defeated them... The Austrian blood is no noodle soup. We're a little different here and I think it's similar with the Germans. In the end, what I see in this whole story is a big opportunity for the whole people.
To answer your question concretely: Yes, there has been establishing itself a capitalist fascist system, which has built up a bogus reality like in the movie "The Matrix": People are lying in their honeycombs, convinced that 'everything's alright, everything is safe. At the same time however people feel that there's something wrong, just like Neo in "Matrix", who feels that something is amiss. And if people try to move 5 or 6cmto the left or to the right, it doesn't have to be politically, then he notices that yes, we have an invisible cage. That's what they built. One of the controls are the media.
In fact the media is supposed to be the fourth power, that regulates the state, the judiciary, the executive, properly control the state and also the legislative. De facto though, nothing happens. Apparently there is an intense collaboration between government and media, and both are beneficiaries and they belong to those people, who profit from false and twisted media coverage. Those are the ones who own the media. If we're on an opera stage,we'll also play the role for which we're paid and it's the same thing with media owned by corporations and that's more and more coming to a head.
Also, there are already documents stating that mainstream journalists have committed themselves in written form to not report anything negative about the US and NATO, to not report negatively about the slave trade treaty, i.e. TTIP. I think they call it free trade agreement.These written documents exist.
Norman: That's even written down in some of their labor contracts...
Monika: It's in there, yes. That also corresponds with Udo Ulfkotte's book, Bought Journalists. IMO, that's a perfect standard work for everyone who believes that we still have media dedicated to the truth.They are not dedicated to objective truth,which I and you guys think does exist. But the type of "truth" fabricated by those who're playing a game that's more perfect than the one played by this strange Dr. Goebbels.
Jörg: That's also exactly what John F. Kennedy demanded: That the media should critically evaluate the government, for example.
Monika: Kennedy held a speech in 1961 where he explicitly addressed this worldwide conspiracy and also named its participants. And he said that it stretches from the military down to the sciences. He also firmly addressed the destabilisation. He was the one who wanted to disempower the Federal Reserve. Kennedy disempowered the mafia, or wanted to do so. Kennedy withdrew part of the military observers in Vietnam back then. And then he said he'd withdraw the remaining 5000 until 1965 - ordered in written form. He prevented the invasion of Cuba,i.e. the Northwood Plans, which had already been devised and were nothing else than a blueprint for 9/11.
He foiled this invasion. And the showpiece of the whole story is that he said "I want to end the Cold War". As the ultimate sign of ending the Cold War Kennedy wanted to fly to the moon together with the Soviet Union. He ordered his staff to get things rolling in this direction. That's all documented in writing. The staff proceeded to implement it, but 12 days after Kennedy had given the order, he was assassinated.
This is proven via documents, which were collectively examined in 1998 by a parliamentary commission: A stack of documents tied to the assassination of John F. Kennedy.Witnesses were manipulated,witnesses were murdered. Kennedy's medical files were partly destroyed and partly falsified, which is proven. His skull had such a hole at the back and a small entry wound at the front. So it was clearly a shot from the front and not from behind, every ballistic expert knows that.
The Warren Report is a book of fairy tales, it belongs right in line with,I don't know what, "Alice in Wonderland" and things like that. The Zapruder movie -Zapruder was the one filming the car's movement - an FBI agent said that this film was falsified. He saw the images, how the brain splashed to the back. The FBI cut that out. They cut out the images, on which you can see that the car in which Kennedy was sitting, right at the moment when the first shots came in, this car slowed down. That means even here the Secret Service was involved. Every security man knows that when there's a shot you step on the gas and drive away.
That guy slowed down. There were no Secret Service men around Kennedy, but with Lyndon B. Johnson, the successor, who was involved in the whole conspiracy, the Secret Service men immediately launched themselves onto him when the shots were coming in. They didn't do that with Kennedy. The car decelerated. Kennedy's brain and parts of his skull splashed at the police officer Hargis and his motorbike, who was driving behind Kennedy. That's all proven, it's even in the Warren Report, which is in this case correct. The motorbike of police officer Hargis was splashed with Kennedy's brain and skull mass. This clearly shows that he was shot from the front. The ballistic evaluation shows that he was gunned down with 5 shots. Probably, if not certainly, Lee Harvey Oswald hasn't fired a single shot.
Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marine, who at the time of the assassination was working in the school building. Again probably, if not certainly he worked there to save John F. Kennedy's life. That's why this man was shot dead 2 days after the assassination. He was in police custody and the shooter was an FBI man named Jack Ruby. This Jack Ruby was then arrested and then he died of a mysterious disease. Some time before his strange death he had said that very powerful people had forced him to shoot Lee Harvey Oswald. The reporter then asked him: "Were these really very powerful people?" He confirmed "Yes, these were very very powerful people, who could lose a lot." So we aren't talking about small mafia people here, we're talking about government people. The mainstream media don't report on this.
"Oh, not again this John F. Kennedy! He wasn't quite kosher, either. He also did things that weren't OK. He had affairs with several women." So what? Doesn't have anything to do with security policies. Nothing at all. Same with the alleged bad treatment of homosexuals and transgenders coming from Putin. Which has nothing to do with Europe's and Russia's security policy. And if I, as a transgender person and lesbian can say this, then I hope that the average people could start asking themselves: "Hmm, maybe that's how it is."
Jessyca: Hmm, that's an important point. We also have a Russian SOTT team, a Russian edition of SOTT. These things about Putin's attitude toward homosexuals etc. even this seems to be a falsified presentation here by the Western media.They basically said that this isn't true at all. There are also people, who've taken a look at Russian laws...
Pashalis: They've simply looked at what do these Russian laws really say, what's written in those laws and what is being reported about them here in our media outlets. Because it's not really about homosexuals but it's about children who are not to be molested by...
Jessyca: By pedophiles.
Pashalis: Basically protecting children from sexual things...
Monika: You can see, as I've said already, it's possible that Putin is a puppet of the NWO. Personally I'm not convinced of it,on the contrary I think that Putin is fighting the NWO. And as we've stated in the beginning, we'll see, we'll see who are the evildoers, we'll detect them by their actions.
Pashalis: Yes, by their actions!
Monika: Putin's deeds aren't evil. He's doing precisely the thing the NWO doesn't want. The NWO don't support homosexual behaviour because of their human kindness but because they want to prevent reproduction. It does make sense to them to minimize people's reproduction, because we're close to 8 billion people and if we keep up our consumption of resources, we'll soon lack the air to breathe. But you'd also have to inform people and make it a matter of democracy and have votes about it. That doesn't happen, though.
That's why they convince us that homosexuality needs to be supported, because it's so great, yeah right... But there are documents that show that the UN has exactly this goal to specifically support homosexuality and thus stop human proliferation. Minimize it. That's precisely what's wrong about it, because if a person is gay or lesbian, then he or she is gay or lesbian, there's no way to socially construct that.
Pashalis: That's simply a private business...
Monika: Yes and that's what Putin is acting against. He also acts against genetically contaminated food, so he's for life.
Pashalis: That's a no-go.
Monika: Yeah that's a no-go: He's against fillers and for foods. He's against the Federal Reserve's enslavement. He's also against the destruction of Europe. He's for Europe. So in the end he's doing everything so that globalisation and NWO won't come to pass. He is our friend. He's the best friend we could ever have here in Europe.
Jessyca: He even offered it to us!
Pashalis: Yes...
Monika: Yes!
Jessyca: He basically said: "Come on, Europe, and turn away from the US!"
Pashalis: And what does Europe do in response???
Monika: And he offered it with a speech given in the German Bundestag...
Pashalis: While giving the speech in the German language!
Monika: In German!! He talks in a language that is so full of heart and brains like no other German or even Austrian politician was ever able to pull off and probably never will be able to pull off. Standing there almost in a pleading way and says, "Please accept my hand, you dear idiots!". That's my interpretation now. He wouldn't have thought in such a way and probably Putin didn't say it like this and probably he didn't think like this, either. But I've seen his speech in this way. "Please take my hand! I'm right here..." - when I saw that in the Bundestag and they dutifully nodded and then did the exact opposite.
So it's no wonder that this man is focusing toward China. It's no wonder. That he's already doing military exercises with China, going to supply China with oil and gas. So it's very clear. The responsibility is mainly with the German government and the German people should call attention to it: "Please make an end to these activities, dear government. Destroy the US plan, the 100-year-old plan to drive a wedge between Germany and Russia. Let's seek cooperation with Russia." As we like to say in Vienna: "The Americans will then finally have lost their foothold in Europe." That's how it's done, there's no other way to make it work.
Norman: What you've just said there serves really well as a concluding statement. It would be really desirable if more people thought the same way.
Jessyca: Definitely!
Norman: And we hope that we with our work and you with your work can reach even more people and that there will be more people like that. That's what we need. What does it help if the 5 of us are simply sitting here talking about this situation if nobody's being reached and that's why it would be great if there will be more and more people.
Monika: There will be. These people are growing in numbers. At the same time however fear is growing steadily. Stepping out of your shadowy existence and standing up for who you are and what you think. We're living in the biggest manipulation of minds ever delivered to the masses. You can hardly state your viewpoint without being labelled a Nazi or anti-semite or whatever absurd definitions they already have in their arsenal of defamation. Of course there are Nazi assholes, of course there are fascist and antisemitic idiots. Certainly though it's not the majority of people. The people who're waking up are not the people's enemy. That's the people who can create a positive future. As said, those are growing in numbers. For some time the suffering will probably increase, until they realize "Oh, it's not so healthy to have a stomach ulcer, I'll go join them now." I'd rather live a short life of freedom than a longer one enslaved. That's a life attitude.
Norman: To our German readers we should mention again that your book is a bestseller in Austria; that went down a bit previously, so we mention it, to provoke a bit of curiosity maybe. Where can you buy it again, guys?
Jörg: You can purchase it at Amazon and at the publisher Amra. It's also available as ebook if I've understood that correctly?
Monika: Ebook, paperback and also as PDF. All 3 types are available .It was a best seller on Amazon also. That does change daily and I don't really take these best seller rankings seriously, because in part it's also a marketing gag. But until now it was on the 1st, 2nd or 3rd rank among security polics, mostly at the 1st rank. Probably also because it's low in price and that's no advertisement now.
Michael Nagula the publisher of Amra and I decided to set the price at a low level to achieve a broad distribution. First and foremost it's not about the profit. The publisher and author earn the smallest amount anyway, you can forget about that. There are people profiting from it, that's almost like robber baronry. LOL. Those who have the most work with it, get the smallest out of it. It's important to us that people have an easily digestible - it isn't easy to digest - but an easily readable and understandable read, which is a short shock to some, but you can flip through it to reason in a factual way if someone approaches you with: "You ain't nothing but a conspiracy theorist."You can then say: "Nah, I'm a conspiracy analyst" and that's already a whole different type of word.
That's why I wrote the analysis. So you can say "OK, I have a conspiracy analysis, which makes sense. You disprove it to me now. Disprove to me what I'm saying here. And I ain't going to keep discussing with you as long as you haven't disproven what I've read here." That's the origin of why I wrote the book. We have to turn the tables. It cannot be that freely thinking people have to justify themselves for being a step closer to truth than the part of society that's been dumbed-down by mainstream media, or to those who dumb down those people. That cannot be. Those others have to justify themselves why their garbage is supposed to be true. That's how I see it!
Norman: Yes, that's how it should be! For everyone wanting to visit your website, since you also have a website, it's called monika-donner.at. We'll also display it on the screen so our Germans can have a look at what's going on beyond their border, which is urgently needed. Apart from that, I think that this was a great interview and we thank you for it.
Thank you, Monika!
Monika: Thanks to you, too, for the great interview, dear Jessyca, dear Norman dear Jörg and dear Pashalis. Is that correct?
SOTT Team: Yes, thank you very much!
Monika: All my love and all the best to you!
Kudos to German SOTT. Frau Donner is not just intelligent and well informed but also fun to listen.