The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has led its Hurricane Research Division's frequently asked questions page with an extraordinary - even for America - statement: "During each hurricane season, there always appear suggestions that one should simply use nuclear weapons to try and destroy the storms."
Simply?
Put nuclear winter aside for a moment.
And even the political - and radioactive - fallout.
NOAA's carefully worded response gives a more practical analysis.
Meteorologist Chris Landsea attempts to put the task into perspective.
First up: don't think the shockwave will have any effect, as it does in the movies.
"Such an event doesn't raise the barometric pressure after the shock has passed because barometric pressure in the atmosphere reflects the weight of the air above the ground," he writes.
"To change a Category 5 hurricane into a Category 2 hurricane you would have to add about a half ton of air for each square meter inside the eye, or a total of a bit more than half a billion (500,000,000) tons for a 20 km radius eye. It's difficult to envision a practical way of moving that much air around."
And while we're on the subject of scale.

He goes on to say the scale of energy needed isn't the only problem. There's also directing and focusing that energy.
What about nuking hurricanes while they're still little?
Landsea pours cold water on that idea, also, by pointing out that about 80 tropical depressions form each year - but only five become hurricanes.

It's back to the drawing board for armchair meteoro-maniacs.




[Link]This is very interesting, weather manipulation that was used for Vietnam war. Technology that could be used to defuse a storm as well.