Fire in the Sky
Alain Bouillard said life vests found among the wreckage were not inflated, indicating the accident happened so quickly that the passengers had no time to react.
Speed sensors on the Airbus A330 flying from Rio de Janeiro to Paris were not to blame, he said, though "we are far from understanding the cause of the crash".
"The plane seems to have hit the surface of the water on its flight trajectory with a strong vertical acceleration," he said, adding that investigators have found "neither traces of fire nor traces of explosives."
One of the automatic messages emitted by the plane indicates it was receiving incorrect speed information from the external monitoring instruments, which could destabilise the control systems. Experts have suggested those external instruments might have iced over.
No information was being given out from autopsies of the bodies found, Bouillard told a news conference at the headquarters of the French air accident agency BEA in Le Bourget, outside Paris.
The chances of finding the flight recorders are falling as the signals they emit fade. Without them, the full causes of the accident may never be known. The automated messages sent by the plane before it fell gave rescuers only a vague location to begin their search. Bouillard said the search for the plane's black boxes has been extended by 10 days and would continue untill 10 July.
Families of the victims had been briefed before the media on the findings so far of the BEA investigation.
Earlier, Christophe Guillot-Noel, head of an association for the crash victims' families said they wanted all the facts, "above all to be able to avoid this eventually happening again".
"We have just one demand: transparency. We have just one expectation: the truth," he said.
Reader Comments
Something tells me that people are going to start putting two and two together and coming up with an alternative reason for this tragedy.
..an automated air navigation system's software, I believe the A330 is this and more, I would not be in the least bit surprised to find a bug in the code. I worked on one which had a huge number of bugs and yet the aircraft was in service and the code fully signed off as regards testing and quality. On the basis of the code fraction I had the time to investigate and extrapolating to the entire code body, no less than 17% of key functions had bugs in them i.e. the investigated fraction had 17% bugs! My favourite bug was the one where when the aircraft was flying vertically downwards the instruments showed it was flying vertically upwards. Naturally the corporation covered this up rather than spend a few dollars fixing it. People have died on this aircraft flying vertically down into the ground out of low cloud. I wonder why?
By the way, aircraft that crash into the ground or the sea... their wreckage; I imagine, looks a lot different from an aircraft that breaks up at high altitude, or has a massive systems failure at a great height.






Why they want to move the public focus from the main reason of accident to the drama of “the accident happened so quickly that the passengers had no time to react.”.
Sorry chaps I fail to understand, react to do what exactly? Perhaps open the door and walk out, shout for help from the passing by jets?
And then hit the water at the speed of almost 700 km pr hour “vertically and intact” but fragments spread around in 60km radius?
Stop this drama making and gives us the real reason of the accident not the common “icing the instruments” crap.