
© Steve Dipaola / Reuters
A federal judge in Virginia has ruled in support of President Donald Trump's latest travel ban for people from six Muslim-majority countries. The ruling comes a week after two federal courts decided against the ban.
In a
decision hailed by the White House, US District Court Judge Anthony Trenga ruled Friday that the revised travel ban could go forward, seeing the latest version as markedly different from the Trump administration's initial effort. The first version of the travel ban was the subject of
negative rulings in federal court last month, most recently in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle, Washington.
Signed on March 6, Trump's second travel-ban executive order placed a 90-day suspension on the issuance of visas to citizens of the six nations - Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen - and all refugee admissions into the US for 120 days."The substantive revisions reflected in [the second order] have reduced the probative value of the President's statements to the point that it is no longer likely that Plaintiffs can succeed on their claim that the predominate purpose of EO-2 is to discriminate against Muslims based on their religion and that EO-2 is a pretext or a sham for that purpose," Trenga wrote.
The new executive order includes "detailed justification," Trenga added, that is "based on national security needs, and enjoining the operation of EO-2 would interfere with the President's unique constitutional responsibilities to conduct international relations, provide for the national defense, and secure the nation."
Comment: See also: US Marshals sent to guard judge who blocked travel ban