It gets worse; Guy wrote today about how this man was banned from a Gadsden mall because he was trolling for high school dates and badgering teenage girls in the process. All of the accusers were teenagers at the time. Yet, one thing the Media Research Center observed was the coverage. Societies mature and change, and yes, maybe it's a good thing that when a woman comes forward with her story about sexual assault, they're not attacked.
That was not the case when Bill Clinton had sexual assault allegations hurled in his direction. And the media mostly fell silent in reporting the allegations. Tim Graham of Newsbusters even found an old 1999 clip from Don Imus' then-radio show, in which Dan Rather, pre-Killian Documents, said that even if the Juanita Broaddrick allegations are true, it was a long time ago, and that we should move on:
Comment: All of the allegations against Moore have something in common, timing. This fact should not be ignored when looking at the individual cases.













Comment: As the author points out, it's not just the allegations that are of interest here. Democrats by and large get preferential treatment by the media, because of their mostly Democrat owners, editors, and writers. So, are these Moore allegations another nothingburger designed to hurt a potential Trump ally, or is there something to them?