In keeping with standard transgender talking points, Planned Parenthood wants parents to
teach their preschoolers that "their genitals don't determine their gender." Instead, gender is whatever you make it to be. As I've heard endlessly from LGBT activists, "Gender is not what's between your legs, it's what's between your ears."
But if that's the case, when a biological boy is convinced he's really a girl, why is he put on hormone blockers to stop the onset of puberty so he won't develop as a boy. And why, when he's old enough, does he get sex change surgery to change his genitals?
I thought genitals didn't determine gender?Why can't he just be a girl with male private parts? Why mess with his private parts if genitals have nothing to do with gender? And why put him on hormones for life so that he won't grow a beard as a female?
Isn't that gender stereotyping? Who says that women shouldn't have beards?
After all, we read today about "
menstruating men" and "
men" having babies. Why not bearded ladies? (Now that I think of it, Tom Neuwirth, aka
Conchita Wurst, has basically said, "Yes, why not?")
Comment: It is a social madness, and it runs even deeper as Rob Slane has argued: More Transgender Rights? No, It's Only the Death of Meaning, Dear!
This one's a must-read, too: Natural expression of gender: The story of a male-identifying little girl who didn't transition