A common line of argument in respectable western policy circles is "if only Putin were gone," followed by a deep sigh of regret. Apparently they have no appreciation for just how moderate Putin is when it comes to foreign policy — and how drastically different the geopolitical scene could be with someone else in Kremlin.The United States and its NATO allies are preparing militarily for the prospect that their rift with Russia could outlast President Vladimir Putin, U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said on Sunday.
Carter, speaking at the start of a week-long trip to Europe, said the United States hoped Russia would return to a forward- looking course and noted areas of diplomatic cooperation with Moscow, including talks over Iran's nuclear program.
But ongoing changes to NATO's military posture, which are meant in part to deter a Russian intervention, illustrate preparations for longer lasting tensions, he said.
"The adaptations I was talking are specifically in anticipation that Russia might not change under Vladimir Putin, or even thereafter," Carter said before landing in Berlin.
Comment: Putin tackled the challenges of post-Soviet Russia, took her back from rapacious oligarchs, and has defended her autonomy ever since. In a system where striving for autonomy leads to death (remember civil rights and MLK Jr., or African autonomy and Gaddafi) Putin is Western 'leadership's' natural enemy. He represents a freedom they cannot control, and therefore he, and the country he governs, are, through no fault of their own, in their cross-hairs.













Comment: Also see: