Puppet MastersS


Eye 1

JFK and 9/11, the tide is turning, the seriously flawed "official story" is now "the conspiracy theory"


Anniversary of 9/11
In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 22 will be the 53rd anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitution's protections of civil liberty.


Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of the oligarchs' government by acknowledging the truth.

The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the government's story. The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as "conspiracy theorists."

Comment: See also:
  • Deconstructing the official narrative around the attacks in Nice, France
  • Documents show JFK was murdered days after demanding answers from CIA about UFOs
  • Famed CIA vet Robert Baer knows man with foreknowledge of 9/11 - has done nothing about it, nor has anyone else



Snakes in Suits

'Please, Allah, make Trump president': Clinton claims Trump win would give ISIS 'a great gift'

Hillary Clinton
© Chris Keane / Reuters
Islamic State jihadists are praying to Allah and "rooting" for Donald Trump to become the next president, according to Hillary Clinton, who lambasted her rival's "demagoguery" and use of the phrase "radical Islam."

"Basically, the jihadists see this as a great gift," the Democratic presidential nominee told Israel's Channel 2 News. "They are saying 'Oh, please Allah, make Trump president of America.'"

In her statement, aired Thursday, the former secretary of state referred to Matt Olsen, former chief of the National Counterterrorism Center, who recently wrote that Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) spokespeople were supporting Trump.

"[Olsen] quoted ISIS spokespeople rooting for Donald Trump's victory, because Trump has made Islam and Muslims part of his campaign," Clinton said.

Cowboy Hat

Russian Admiral: Once in a while, we still have to slap the Pentagon in the face when near our borders

Chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee Vladimir Komoyedov
Chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee Vladimir Komoyedov.
Originally appeared at Izvestia - Russian daily news. Translated by Julia Rakhmetova

After another Pentagon statement on "unsafe and unprofessional maneuvers" by a ship or aircraft of some country in the vicinity of US sailors and pilots, who 'peacefully' violate Russian, Chinese or Iranian borders, my friends are usually indignant. This happened recently when the American Navy P-8A Poseidon surveillance aircraft twice approached Russia's border over the Black Sea and were intercepted by Sukhoi Su-27 fighters.

American military tend to misbehave, believing they will escape punishment. Dotting the world with reconnaissance stations, interception and wiretapping systems, they are sure that as "Big Brother," they can take the liberty of doing anything they want. They do this until someone explains in plain language that they must not misbehave, sobering them with a slap in the face.

Many remember the incident of the U-2 spy plane piloted by Gary Powers shot down over Sverdlovsk in 1960. In 1988, the Bezzavetny guard ship literally pushed the American missile cruiser USS Yorktown out of Soviet territorial waters. Deputy Commander in Chief of the Black Sea Fleet Rear-Admiral Valery Kulikov, who took a direct part in that incident as a first mate on the Bezzavetny told me the story.

Gold Seal

Dancing Israelis on 9/11 points to the real criminals of that day: 'Our purpose was to document the event'

Dancing israelis
TRANSCRIPT
DAN RATHER: "Some evil is just ... it can't be explained."

DAVID LETTERMAN: "Are these people happy? Are they joyous now? Are they celebrating? Thank God?"

DAN RATHER: "Oh absolutely, they're celebrating. There's one report, this has not been confirmed but there is several eye[witness] reports that there was a cell, one of these cells across the Hudson River. And they got on the ... this is the report and I emphasize that I don't know this for a fact but there's several witnesses who say this happened. They got on the roof of a building to look across, they knew what was gonna happen. They were waiting for it to happen and when it happened they celebrated. They jumped for joy."

(SOURCE: The Late Show with David Letterman - 09/17/01)
In the days after 9/11, while Ground Zero continued to smoulder, millions heard Dan Rather and various media outlets repeat vague and unconfirmed reports of arrests that took place that day. These rumors held that Middle Eastern men, presumably Arabs, were arrested in explosive-packed vans in various places around the city on September 11th, and that some had even been photographing and celebrating those events. What most do not realize is that those reports were not mere rumors, and we now have thousands of pages of FBI, CIA and DOJ reports documenting those arrests.

Dollar

Why wouldn't Washington fight drug trafficking?

DEA with gun
Last June, the US was celebrating its 45th anniversary of its fight against drugs. However, since the announcement of the war on drugs by President Richard Nixon in 1971, the number of drug addicts in the United States over the years have not decreased. What's even worse is the number of Americans who die from drug overdoses is on the rise in the United States today.

However, the civil body that is tasked with providing drug rehabilitation has recently come to the conclusion that 90% of people who are in need of rehabilitation and extensive treatment which would allow them to escape drug addiction are not receiving such aid. As for those who do receive such assistance, only 30 percent of them manage to return to their regular lives. As for the centers that receive public funding to assist people in their fight against addiction, they are often headed by poorly prepared specialist that are using outdated techniques and ineffective treatments.

The lack of any comprehensive results in the so-called "war on drugs" leads us to an important question: where did 1.5 trillion dollars allocated to fight lethal overdoses, drug addiction and the brutal violence that accompanies this illegal trade go?

Newspaper

Is the Merkel era coming to an end?

Angela Merkel
© AFP
There are days in the life of a chancellor when the chasm between the glamour of the geopolitical stage and the political squalor back home is despairingly vast. Last Sunday was such a day for Angela Merkel.

Shortly before 10 a.m. local time, the German chancellor's Airbus touched down gently at Hangzhou airport, a red-carpet rolling up as the plane slowed to a stop. Just 200 meters away, Air Force One was parked and behind it stood French President François Hollande's aircraft. With engines roaring, the jumbo carrying Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe taxied past. On this September morning, the Hangzhou airport had become the parking lot of global politics.

The leaders had come to the Chinese city for the two-day G-20 summit. As Merkel strode past soldiers with fixed bayonets to her waiting sedan, she was facing a busy couple of days. Even before the summit officially began, she held a meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to discuss the same issues as ever: Syria, refugees and Islamic State. Then she quickly headed over to the Expo Center for a meeting with the other world leaders. This time, the focus was on possible stimulus measures for the global economy. Dinner was served at 7 p.m. at the Chinese government's guest house before the group took a boat ride on Yue Lake -- which Merkel followed with a one-on-one with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The German leader would like to see the Kremlin chief put a stop to his ongoing meddling in Ukraine.

Comment: See also: Integrate or leave: Merkel's Bavaria allies want enshrined in law 'dominant' German-Christian values


Question

Growing rift in EU over NATO's provocative policy toward Russia

NATO soldiers
© REUTERS/ Kacper Pempel
NATO is taking every effort to justify its raison d'etre. However, the Alliance's saber-rattling on Russia's doorstep is triggering deep concern and anxiety among its members. Although "the marriage of interests" still holds, cracks are appearing among the bloc's members.

NATO member states are watching the Alliance's muscle-flexing near Russia's borders with growing concern, Turkish scholar and author Haydar Cakmak writes in his op-ed for Yenicag Gazetesi.

"There are no doubts that NATO's anti-missile defense system elements, which are deployed in Poland and Hungary to protect the European territories against attacks from the Middle East... are aimed against Russia," Cakmak underscored adding that the installations are triggering concerns among NATO European members, most notably, France and Germany.

"Russia is [also] aware that these missiles are aimed against it," he noted.

Comment: See also: EU having doubts as NATO ramps up Baltic forces


Biohazard

Destruction of 500 tons of toxic chemicals from Libya welcomed by German FM

Frank-Walter Steinmeier
© Sputnik/ Alexander Vilf
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier welcomed on Friday the destruction in the German city of Muenster of 500 metric tons of precursor chemicals which could be used to synthesize poison gases, delivered from Libya.

"Germany works very specifically together with the international community and with many partners, and helps the Libyan National Unity government to neutralize and dispose of the remnants of the Libyan chemical weapons program in accordance with the environmental safety standards," Steinmeier told journalists.

It is crucial to prevent toxic chemicals from falling into the wrong hands and, by doing this, to contribute to the security of Germany, Europe and Libya, he added.

Comment: See:


Light Saber

The tide has turned: Syrian army's Aleppo ultimatum: 'surrender, leave city in 2 days or else'

Aleppos ultimatum
Amidst more reports of government advances in the vicinities of Damascus and Aleppo, the Syrian military gives the Jihadi fighters in Aleppo an ultimatum requiring them to surrender or leave in 2 days.

Whilst Lavrov and Kerry negotiate with each other in Geneva - with no reports so far of any progress being made - news from the Syrian battlefronts points to continuing changes in the overall situation.

Whilst most attention has been focused on 'the Great Battle of Aleppo' in the north, the British reporter Patrick Cockburn is reporting major gains by the Syrian military in the south around Damascus. According to Cockburn, who has recently toured the area
"Four years ago the city (Damascus - AM) was a jigsaw puzzle of pro-government and pro-opposition areas with each side trying to expand their heavily defended islands of authority. But today the government holds almost all of the city and its outskirts aside from a single large opposition enclave to the east, known as East Ghouta. Isolated, starved, bombarded, divided among themselves and sensing that the war is going against them, the rebel townships are surrendering on terms that leaves the government in charge."

Comment: This recent turn of events has perhaps been one of the reasons that the US has decided, for now, to cut its losses - at least until some new strategy of chaos can be formulated and implemented in Syria. Because it looks like Kerry just struck a deal with Lavrov. But consider the circumstances:
Meanwhile, political analyst Ammar Waqqaf has cast doubt on the sincerity of Kerry's assertion that "going on Al-Nusra" was never a negotiating point.

"United States have made a big decision in ditching Jabhat Al-Nusra to preserve the other fighting groups, the other what they call the moderate fighting groups," the analyst told RT, calling it the "cornerstone" of the deal.

Waqqaf is sure that Washington's move was prompted by the rapid advance of Syrian armed forces on rebel positions, which would have imminently led to the "severe deterioration" of the so-called moderate forces and hardline terrorist groups, including Al-Nusra, alike.

The decision to turn away from the most radical groups was made "to try and tie the Syrian state hand and Russian hand, in order to preserve the other groups who are less extremist but still extremist but they would call them moderate know," to preserve less extremist rebels.

The recent Al-Nusra rebranding when the militant group formally severed all ties with Al-Qaeda and changed its name to Jabhat Fateh al-Sham could have resulted in its inclusion into the moderate opposition if Washington had not strived to find a compromise with Russia, Waqqaf said.

For its part, the Saudi-backed High Negotiating Committee (HNC) issued a statement welcoming the split and encouraging the former Al-Nusra group to commit to further reforms.

"Saudi Arabia saw an opportunity to bring Jabhat Al-Nusra, which is a formidable fighting force under their umbrella, and tried to tell the Americans: Look, we can turn this into real moderates and you do not have to bomb them."

However, "Americans knew that there would be no deal with Russian unless Jabhat Al-Nusra is called Jabhat Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda and that they are separate [from moderate rebels]."



Dollar Gold

The new sanctions against Russia - another 'message' to Putin and Europe

putin
Latest round of US sanctions more symbolic than effective, sanctioning individuals and companies sanctioned already.


On 1st September 2016 the US Treasury announced a further expansion of US sanctions against Russia.

The new sanctions are essentially symbolic. They fall into four distinct categories:
  1. against CJSC ABR Management ("ABR Management") for undertaking certain management work on behalf of the already sanctioned Bank Rossiya - a medium sized Russian bank based in St. Petersburg which the US and various other people have convinced themselves - almost certainly wrongly - that Putin either owns or has a stake in.
  2. against certain individuals holding various official positions either in Crimea or in the Donetsk People's Republic;
  3. against certain companies and Russian state institutions involved in building the bridge between Crimea and Kerch; and
  4. against certain companies which are subsidiaries of Gazprom and are involved in its work.
The bridge being built between Crimea and Kerch is connected to Arkady Rotenberg, who is already subject to US sanctions.
Any companies connected or controlled by him would already be affected by sanctions.

Gazprom is itself subject to sanctions as by extension are its subsidiaries, which are involved in its operations.