Puppet MastersS


Mail

Killary answers Judicial Watch written questions under penalty of perjury in email lawsuit

Hillary Clinton
Because the threat of perjury charges is so compelling . . . . riiiight.
Hillary Clinton submitted formal answers under penalty of perjury on Thursday about her use of a private email server, saying 20 times that she did not recall the requested information or related discussions, while also asserting that no one ever warned her that the practice could run afoul of laws on preserving federal records.

"Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall being advised, cautioned, or warned, she does not recall that it was ever suggested to her, and she does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that her use of a clintonemail.com e-mail account to conduct official State Department business conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws," lawyers for Clinton wrote.


Comment: Horsehockey! Is Killary setting up her team for the blame? They certainly knew what was going on.

Circa sources: Hillary violated federal records laws, and the FBI knows it
Accounts from witnesses suggested the efforts to keep Mrs. Clinton's government email communications on a device and server outside the reach of public records laws or congressional oversight were "systemic and intentional" and began as soon as Mrs. Clinton took office in 2009, one source told Circa.

For instance, the sources said agents secured testimony and documents suggesting that Mrs. Clinton's team:
  • Was informed in 2009 that she had an obligation under the records law to forward any government-related records contained in private email to a new record preservation system known as SMART but chose not to do so because her office wanted to keep control over "sensitive" messages.
  • Was specifically questioned by a technical worker who was involved with her private email server in the Clinton family home in New York whether the arrangement was appropriate for a government official under the federal records law. The worker was assured there were no problems.
  • Wanted to keep her private Blackerry email service because of fears a government email address would be subject to public scrutiny under the Freedom of Information Act.
  • Was aware that government officers complying with FOIA requests did not have access to search Mrs. Clinton's private email for responsive records.
  • Persisted in allowing her to use private email to conduct State Department business even after a cable was sent under her name in 2011 to all diplomats worldwide urging them to stop using private email because of foreign hacking fears.
  • Allowed Clinton to keep using the private email system after after she personally received a 2011 presentation warning of dangers of the private email for government business.
  • Failed to preserve private emails from Clinton that clearly involved significant government business, including discussions with Army Gen. David Petraues, the Benghazi tragedy, meeting requests with foreign leaders and the State Department's quadrennial policy and performance review.
  • Had prior reason from earlier legal cases involving their conduct to know that emails covering government business were legally required to be preserved and turned over to their agency and the National Archives.

Clinton also said she could not recall ever being warned about any hacking or attempted hacking of her private account or server.

Clinton signed the legal filing Monday "under penalty of perjury." The submission was ordered by a federal judge in connection with a Freedom of Information Action lawsuit filed by the conservative group Judicial Watch.

Lawyers for the group asked for a live deposition where they could question Clinton in person, but U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan instead ordered Clinton to answer written questions.

Whistle

OSHA accused of neglecting federal whistleblowers' rights and protection

red whistle
© Insurance Journal
Numerous federal protections are afforded to whistleblowers to shield them from retaliation. But if this is the case, why was former Wells Fargo general manager Claudia Ponce de Leon fired after reporting on some of the bank's now-notorious fraudulent accounts? Federal labor regulators claim that Wells Fargo knew about its employees creating unauthorized accounts since 2011, but the government may have known about it for just as long. Ponce de Leon filed a federal whistleblower complaint in 2011, but not one investigator or official ever responded to her about it.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) whistleblower program was created with the intention of allowing employees the right to report illegal or unsafe behavior in the workplace. They were the people Ponce de Leon needed the most after she was fired for allegedly telling superiors about some of the illegal transactions Wells Fargo employees were conducting.

She is far from the only former Wells Fargo employee who alleges that they were fired as retaliation against whistleblowing. In fact, OSHA has received 91 complaints of retaliation as a result of reporting wrongdoings since 2002, Reuters reported. Thirty-four of those complaints have not been resolved.

Comment: Since passage of the OSH Act in 1970, Congress has expanded OSHA's whistleblower authority to protect workers from retaliation under twenty-two federal laws. However, it seems OSHA can't even manage to protect its own whistleblowers.


Stock Down

UK: Assets and property targeted to eliminate dirty money from abroad

for sale signs UK
© www.smallcellseverywhere.com
Hundreds of properties in Britain suspected of belonging to overseas criminals could be seized under new laws designed to crack down on corruption and dispel accusations that London is a haven for dirty money. The Criminal Finances Bill, introduced on Thursday, would force suspected criminals to prove their source of finance through "unexplained wealth orders"or risk having their assets seized.

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and HM Revenue and Customs (HRMC) will be able to apply to the High Court for an order forcing the owner of an asset to explain how they obtained the funds to purchase it. If the owner fails to demonstrate how they acquired a property or a piece of jewelry, agencies will be able to seize it.

The law is designed to close a loophole which has left the authorities powerless to seize property from overseas criminals unless the individuals are first convicted in their country of origin. "This legislation will ensure the UK is taking a world-leading role in cracking down on corruption and send a clear message to criminals - we will take your liberty and your money," said Security Minister Ben Wallace, who announced the bill.

London's property market has allegedly become a safe haven for corrupt politicians, tax evaders and criminals to store the proceeds of international corruption. Even after hosting a summit on anti-corruption and money laundering earlier this year, the UK has continued to come under pressure. Huge amounts of corrupt wealth is laundered through the capital's banks, with the National Crime Agency believing up to £100 billion (US$122 billion) of tainted cash could be passing through the UK each year.

Comment: In 2013 the National Audit Office (NAO) concluded that the amount of proceeds of crime actually confiscated is "paltry", at 26 pence of every £100. As at September 2015, the total debt outstanding from confiscation orders was calculated at £1.61 billion, although this figure is problematic. Nearly a third of it represents interest and penalties for non-payment, and because of the complexities of the cases involved, confiscation orders may be made for assets that never actually existed. It is likely that the majority of the assets that do exist are beyond the reach of the authorities. There are very few incentives for criminals to either engage with the courts or to pay the money back, with many choosing to extend their prison sentences to avoid paying. Non-payment of a confiscation order should be a criminal offence to ensure offenders do not just see out a prison sentence to keep their ill-gotten gains.


Arrow Up

Election tipper: Proof voter fraud is real

I voted did you? tombstone
© MaverickVoice.comThe polls register dead people...the democracy of a dying breed.
Data suggests millions of voter registrations are fraudulent or invalid. That's enough to tip an election, easily. This week, liberals have been repeating their frequent claim that voter fraud doesn't exist. A recent Salon article argues that "voter fraud just isn't a problem in Pennsylvania," despite evidence to the contrary. Another article argues that voter fraud is entirely in the imagination of those who use voter ID laws to deny minorities the right to vote.

Yet as the election approaches, more and more cases of voter fraud are beginning to surface. In Colorado, multiple instances were found of dead people attempting to vote. Stunningly, "a woman named Sara Sosa who died in 2009 cast ballots in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013." In Virginia, it was found that nearly 20 voter applications were turned in under the names of dead people.

In Texas, authorities are investigating criminals who are using the technique of "vote harvesting" to illegally procure votes for their candidates. "Harvesting" is the practice of illegally obtaining the signatures of valid voters in order to vote in their name without their consent for the candidate(s) the criminal supports.

These are just some instances of voter fraud we know about. It would be silly to assume cases that have been discovered are the only cases of fraud. Indeed according to a Pew Research report from February 2012, one in eight voter registrations are "significantly inaccurate or no longer valid." Since there are 146 million Americans registered to vote, this translates to a stunning 18 million invalid voter registrations on the books. Further, "More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters, and approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state." Numbers of this scale obviously provide ripe opportunity for fraud.

Comment: Just more reasons why your vote is of negligible importance in the "grand scheme" of all things USA.


Propaganda

Western presstitutes hide fact that U.S. backed down in Syria after Russian warning

Kerry Lavrov
© Andrew Kelly/Reuters
The Western media is failing to report the public news that the US publicly backed down over its plans to attack Syria after receiving a Russian warning, so that it can continue to advocate military action without provoking alarm on the part of the Western public.

An objective observer of international news would be forgiven for thinking that last week witnessed the most dangerous moment of the post-Cold War era.

What were undoubtedly well sourced media reports confirmed that discussions were underway within the US government about possible attacks on the Syrian military.

These reports appeared in Reuters, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal, and confirmed that a meeting would take place at "staff level" on Wednesday 5th October 2016 to discuss military options to present to the President.

The military option which appeared to be the most strongly favoured was covert military strikes on Syrian army bases.

These reports provoked a warning from the Russian military on Tuesday 4th October 2015 that any US aircraft engaged in attacks on Syrian army bases risked being shot down by the Russian air defence troops stationed in Syria. This was not an empty threat since the Russian military has stationed advanced S-400 and S-300MV Antey-2500 anti aircraft missiles in Syria.

Eye 2

Donbass flaring up: Ukrainian forces attack southern Donetsk; firefight ongoing - NATO helicopter shot down

Ukraine attack Donbass
© Maks Vetrov/ Sputnik
Ukrainian security forces have gone on the attack in the south of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic. The losses of the Ukrainian side have amounted to 5 people killed. This news was reported by journalists by the official representative of the DPR's Ministry of Defense, Eduard Basurin.

"Ukrainian units, violating their obligations to maintain a ceasefire from 13:50, have started to attack our positions. After conducting artillery training with the use of 152 mm guns, enemy units went on the attack with a force of up to one company near the residential area of Leninskoe," the DPR's defense department's spokesperson stated.

According to Basurin, the attack is ongoing under the cover of mortar fire, and a fire fight is currently underway. "The preliminary losses of the enemy include one infantry fighting vehicle destroyed, and 5 security officers eliminated," he reported.

The defense ministry of the DPR has also demanded that the OSCE take measures to address Ukrainian security forces' violation of the ceasefire.

Via RIA Novosti- Translated by J. Arnoldski

Comment: The day before this flare-up, the DPR shot down a helicopter. Turns it was manned by NATO "instructors":
The Ministry of Defense of the DPR has released information that instructors from NATO countries were onboard the helicopter that the republic's servicemen shot down yesterday. DPR deputy operative commander Eduard Basurin stated this today, October 14th.

"In the helicopter at the moment of its sortie were military instructors from NATO countries," Basurin said. According to DPR intelligence, the helicopter crash landed in the area surrounding Krasngotovka. As the republic's command has pointed out, the area is now cordoned off and cellular communication is disabled there.

Yesterday, DPR head Alexander Zakharchenko stated that the UAF attempted to attack DPR positions under the cover of a military helicopter, which was shot down but managed to land. According to paragraph seven of the Minsk Memorandum from September 19th, 2014, the use of combat aircraft and drones is prohibited along the entire contact line designated for the ceasefire with the exception of OSCE SMM UAV's.

The last time that Kiev used aircraft in Donbass near Gorlovka was on January 18th, 2015, when several SU-25 fighter jets were noticed in the sky.



Bizarro Earth

Time to pay attention: In the last 48 hours, humanity moved closer to the brink of World War

World bomb graphic
Months of disquieting and needless escalation between the United States and Russia over Syria and the Asia-Pacific theater quickened feverishly to near outright hostility over the past 48 hours, and — considering semantics from both ends suggestive of antebellum blame-casting — it's past time to pay attention.

Indeed, though a few analysts still dismissively liken the tensions to so much blustery rhetoric, a growing number contend obstinate U.S. posturing about Russian aggression hasn't been taken so lightly by President Vladimir Putin and his rapidly amassing allies.

Additionally, it now seems the U.S. has backed its incessant finger-pointing with the subtle language necessary to undertake what could best, if ironically, be termed a 'defensive first strike.'

While full-scale nuclear war might indeed be an outside possibility at this early date, the specter of full military engagement is quickly materializing on several fronts. To understand how we arrived so near this precipice, a series of events and statements over the previous month should be considered contextually with those of the last two days.

Snakes in Suits

WikiLeaks: Clinton says 'we'll ring China with missile defense' and claims the 'American Sea'

Hillary Clinton
© Kevin Lamarque / Reuters
The US could surround China with missiles if Beijing doesn't agree to Washington's requests to use its influence to disrupt North Korea's nuclear program, Hillary Clinton apparently said, according to recently leaked emails.

A document featuring Hillary Clinton's private speech transcripts is among leaked emails belonging to her campaign manager, John Podesta. WikiLeaks has been releasing the emails since last week, with over 10,000 hacked documents published so far.

Some of them are believed to reveal the Democratic presidential candidate's stance on relations with China.

"We're going to ring China with missile defense. We're going to put more of our fleet in the area," Clinton apparently said privately in a 2013 speech, when she was head of the US State Department, as quoted by AP.

Rocket

Russia mulls supplying air defense systems to Turkey

erdogan putin
© Reuters
Moscow says it "may consider" supplying Turkey with air defense systems in a further warming of ties after a feud over the downing of a Russian jet last year.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russian news agencies on October 14 that Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan held talks in Istanbul earlier this week in which the prospect of supplying Ankara with air defense systems was brought up.

"Various missile defense systems were mentioned and if the Turkish side so desires, Russia may consider the possibility of supplying Turkey in various ways," Peskov said about the talks on October 10.

Turkey's private NTV channel, citing Turkish Foreign Ministry sources, said earlier this week that Ankara was ready to accept an offer from Russia for a Turkish tender to build long-range air defense systems.

Comment: See also:


Bad Guys

The global conflict zones just waiting to reignite: Kashmir, South China Sea, Colombia, Congo

world wars
More often than not, the world's attention is on geopolitical and military processes that are already in an active phase. The analytical group Tsargrad offers an overview of the smoldering conflicts in the periphery that could provoke new rounds of instability in near future.

Kashmir

Recently, disturbing news emerged from the India-Pakistan border. From the Indian side there were reports of precision strikes on headquarters of terrorist groups in Kashmir, with Pakistan denouncing an invasion of its territory. Before that, on September 18, as a result of the attack of Jaish-e-Mohammed, 18 Indian soldiers were killed in Delhi controlled Jammu and Kashmir.

The ancient land of Kashmir became an apple of discord between Pakistan, India and also China, after independence from Britain in 1947. It was then that "The White Man's Burden" laid a delayed action mine, or more precisely an entire minefield, where explosions occur time after time, two states having been created out of one colony - India for Hindus and Pakistan for Muslims.