Puppet MastersS


Bullseye

Turkish military expert: US plan for breaking down and partitioning Syria is confirmed

Kurd rally
© Getty Images
It is only too evident that the US' plan for Syria is to break it down, partition it. On Tuesday The Duran reported that tensions in Syria had hit an all time high when the US military shot down a Syrian SU-22 that was attacking Al Qaeda jihadist forces on the ground.

Syria was flying its jets over Syrian sovereign territory, moving to attack Al Qaeda jihadists (aka "moderate rebels") operating illegally in Syrian territory, and backed up by US forces, which have set up operations illegally within Syrian sovereign territory.

We pointed out that...
The US has not been invited by the internationally recognized government of Syria to fight ISIS on Syrian land, and as such the United States has de-facto invaded and occupied Eastern Syria.

To make matters worse, the US is supporting Al Qaeda terrorists as a foot soldier proxy army, in order to secure as much of Eastern Syria as possible, and create a rump state Syria, effectively dividing the once united country.

Russia responded to the US aggression by saying its surface-to-air missile systems in Syria would begin to track manned and unmanned aircraft from the US coalition if they move west of the Euphrates River.
America's plan to divide Syria into an Eastern Sunni/Jihadist state and a Western secular nation is taking hold, as American forces have vowed to protect "coalition" partners (aka Kurdish forces and Al Qaeda proxy armies) occupying large swaths of lands in a sovereign Syria. It is nothing more than an illegal occupation under the protection of the United States military.

Comment: No matter what the US does or doesn't do in Syria, what happens is directed by the nation that has its 'hand' within the 'glove.'


Attention

Two NSC members want full-blown war in Southern Syria "against Iran"

Cohen-WatnickHarveyFlynn
© startribune.com/SalonEzra Cohen-Watnick • Derek Harvey • Michael Flynn
National Security Council members want a US ground offensive against the Syrian Army and allied militias

We think the US posture in Southern Syria (carving out an occupation zone, killing Syrian army troops) is plenty bellicose enough, but for some it's still not quite self-righteous and aggressive enough.

Two National Security Council members are pushing for the US to go on an offensive against the Syrian army and allied Shia militias:
A pair of top White House officials is pushing to broaden the war in Syria, viewing it as an opportunity to confront Iran and its proxy forces on the ground there, according to two sources familiar with the debate inside the Donald Trump administration. Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence on the National Security Council, and Derek Harvey, the NSC's top Middle East advisor, want the United States to start going on the offensive in southern Syria, where, in recent weeks, the U.S. military has taken a handful of defensive actions against Iranian-backed forces fighting in support of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Comment: Cohen-Watnick is the Flynn protege who was behind the Devin Nunes, Susan Rice un-masking. Hawk Dereck Harvey, former advisor to David Patraeus, is now chief intel advisor at the NSC and chief Middle East advisor. So far, both appear to be 'unfireable.' Someone's choice or someone's agenda?


Comment: An attack on Iranian forces, in any country or context, equates to an attack on the Russian coalition. This would be an epic disaster. Trump would be wise to get his advisory ducks aligned with his agenda or eliminate them one-by-one as they show their true blue and white feathers, no matter what Jared says.


Info

Whistleblower: Saudi Arabia and UAE plotted to stage coup in Qatar before US interference

Mohammad bin Zayyed and Mohammad bin Salman
Saudi whistle-blower Mujtahid, who is believed to be a member of or have a well-connected source in the royal family, revealed an unprecedented plot by Saudi Arabia and the UAE for carrying out a coup in Qatar.

Mujtahid on his Twitter page wrote that UAE's Mohammad bin Zayyed and Saudi Arabia's Mohammad bin Salman had been plotting to wage a coup in Qatar.

According to the scenario, the Saudi and UAE forces were planning to stage a coup in Qatar by occupying that country in cooperation with Blackwater security forces and give control of the country to a sheikh from Al Thani family who would support Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

He noted that they cancelled their plot in the last moment after the US interference.

Attention

18 Israeli fighter jets deployed in Saudi Arabia to prevent Nayef coup

Mohammed bin Nayef bin Abdulaziz
18 Israeli fighter jets along with two Gulfstream aircraft landed in Saudi Arabia on Thursday to prevent any hostile or military moves by former Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef bin Abdulaziz who was replaced with Saudi King Salman's son.

Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz announced on Wednesday his decision to replace Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef bin Abdulaziz with his own son, Mohammed bin Salman.

After the decision was announced, the Israeli air force sent 18 of its fighter jets, including F16I, F15CD and F16CD, along with two Gulfstream aircraft, two tanker airplanes and two C130 planes, special for electronic warfare, to Saudi Arabia at the demand of the new crown prince bin Salman to block his cousin (bin Nayef)'s possible measures.

According to a royal decree, Mohammed bin Salman, 31, was also named deputy prime minister, and shall maintain his post as defense minister, the official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) reported on Wednesday.

Star of David

Psychopath Lieberman: Establishing safe zones in Syria will not limit Israeli freedom of action

Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman
Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman
Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said that Israel had no intention to start a military campaign in Syria, however, Tel Aviv would continue responding to shelling from Syrian territory.

The creation of de-escalation zones in Syria will not limit Israel's capabilities to act in the war-torn country in case of threats to the security of the Jewish state, Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Thursday.


Comment: If you define "security" as the right to commit wanton unprovoked aggression that is.


Sherlock

FBI to leakers: We will find and prosecute you

top secret files
© DNY59 / Getty Images
Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe has issued a warning to leakers of classified information - that the government will find and prosecute them.
"Leaking of classified information is a federal crime and it is one that we have the jurisdiction to investigate, and I assure you that we will do so in every single case," McCabe told Representative John Culberson (R-Texas), while testifying at a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing about the FBI's budget on Wednesday.
Culberson had asked the acting FBI director about Reality Winner, the 25-year-old federal contractor who was charged this month with leaking a top-secret National Security Agency memo accusing Russia of carrying out a cyberattack on a US voting software supplier. The document does not provide the underlying "raw" intelligence for the assessment.

During a hearing at the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, cybersecurity officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI said that although they believed that Russia had targeted election-related systems in 21 US states, there was no evidence that any vote tallies were affected.

Comment: The problem is that there seems to be at least two types of 'leakers'. First, there are the whistleblowers. Good people who see abuses being committed by their country and wish to do something to stop it. Second, there are the Deep State agents who are doing everything in their power to keep Trump in line by 'leaking' lies to the media. The latter are the leakers the FBI needs to go after, not the whistleblowers.


Info

Stating the obvious: Family of downed pilot says US-led coalition protects ISIS by targeting Syrian forces

U.S.-led air strike Raqqa
© Nour Fourat / ReutersU.S.-led air strike in Raqqa
The US-led coalition's downing of a Syrian Army plane near Raqqa province shows that the group is not fighting Islamic State terrorists but is instead protecting them, the family of the pilot told Ruptly.

A Syrian Su-22 jet was shot down by a US aircraft in the vicinity of Raqqa, northern Syria, on June 18. Damascus said that at the time of the attack that the pilot, later identified as Ali Fahd, was carrying out a mission "to destroy IS [Islamic State, formerly ISIS/ISIL] terrorists." The pilot reportedly ejected from the plane above IS-controlled territory and is still missing.

"Before he was targeted by the coalition, he was executing a mission of destroying operations headquarters of the IS terrorist organization in Raqqa," Mohyyddin Fahd, the pilot's cousin, told Ruptly in the city of Salamiyah, Hama province, on Wednesday.

"The coalition targeting of the pilot proves that the [coalition] and IS are the same. We thought otherwise about the coalition, that it aimed to liberate the land and purify it from the dirt of terrorism altogether, but it turned out the opposite," Mohyyddin concluded bitterly.


Comment: See also:


Arrow Down

The Contrast Problem: Why the new healthcare bill will be a loser

Mitch McConnell
People accuse me of imagining that everything President Trump does is brilliant (persuasion-wise) no matter what he does. But I expect the next version of the Republican healthcare bill to be a complete failure. That's because Republicans seem deeply committed to a losing path, thanks to what might be called the Contrast Problem.

Contrast is the driving principle behind all decisions. You have to know how your options differ, and by how much, or else you have no basis for a decision. President Obama solved for the contrast problem by designing Obamacare to cover more people than before. The rest of the details - especially the costs - were hard to predict, so our brains flushed that noise and focused on the greater number of people covered.

Everyone knew Obamacare would need future tuning to get it right. That gave us mental permission to focus on the good parts we understood - the greater coverage - and hope the other details would get worked out later. President Obama nailed the Contrast Problem like the Master Persuader he is.

That was then.

Now, President Trump and the Republicans have the "going second" problem. The public will compare their proposed bill with Obamacare and conclude that the one metric they understand - the number of people covered - does not compare favorably with Obamacare. The contrast is fatal.

Chess

While UK citizens distracted by grief, May was quietly helping Murdoch empire take over UK media

theresa may Grenfell Tower
In recent weeks, a series of man-made tragedies have struck Britain. From terror attacks to the Grenfell Tower inferno. UK citizens have been grieving for the victims, and fighting to prevent future tragedies. Meanwhile, Theresa May was busy elsewhere - trying to seal a deal for the wholesale takeover of UK media by Rupert Murdoch.

The Sky deal

Rupert Murdoch tried to take full control of Sky in 2011. But the phone hacking scandal and revelations from the Leveson inquiry forced the government to withdraw support. And the deal fell through.

Just a few years later, Murdoch is at it again. This time, 21st Century Fox is putting up £11.7bn to buy out the 61% of Sky that the Murdochs don't already own. The deal would give Murdoch an unprecedented ownership of UK media. Labour MP David Winnick expressed serious concern about the near-monopoly this would create for Murdoch, saying "it would be simply unacceptable that the amount of media ownership he already controls should be increased".

The Murdochs have expressed confidence that, this time, the deal will go though. So have industry insiders. They're pleased this time that other events are keeping the deal well away from the front pages.

Info

'Our brand's worse than Trump': Democrats demand 'toxic' Pelosi step aside, Trump urges her to stay

Pelosi add
Democrats' embarrassing special-election loss in Georgia, after the liberal media built up unrealistic expectations, has provoked a wave of bitter blowback that targets House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi.

As Axios notes, it's part of a generational argument that's also driving the party's 2020 conversation.
"It was a very rough night for Nancy Pelosi," said Sean Clegg, a Democratic strategist in San Francisco, adding that he was personally a big fan of hers.

"Republican messaging attacking Pelosi appeared to be more effective than Democratic messaging against Trump. That's a problem going forward, and it's going to be a challenge in House races particularly."

"I think the problem is we have not come up with an agenda and then we need a strategy to communicate it," Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., said.

"We can't just be against something."