OF THE
TIMES
"Talking about certain conditions to be made in exchange for having access to diplomatic property looks like trading and even blackmail," Dzabarov said.
"Both sides are facing the same very task: first of all, preserve face, secondly, demonstrate to the other party that it is talking from a position of strength," the outlet says.It further points out at a very interesting fact: the low rank of the US official who made the latest statement. From the Russian side, the issue has been addressed by the Foreign Ministry and the Kremlin, while the rank of the Washington official was evidently lower.
"There is an impression that the White House is trying to solve a dual problem: on the one hand, demonstrate its position of strength in the relations with Moscow, on the other, it decreases the significance of the issue for bilateral relations. It is not the fact of the matter that either Tillerson or Trump could have voiced similar statements. Certainly, they could. Even more so, as both the President and the Secretary of State have recently made quite sharp public statements with regards to Russia," the newspaper says.What is also of a particular interest, the newspaper says, is that
Moscow still does not blame President Trump for the issue, while openly putting the blame on the US Department of State. The warning to not only expel US diplomats and arrest US diplomatic property, but to considerably cut the personnel of the US embassy in Russia looks like a measure which will backfire not on President Trump but on the State Department and its everyday work.
"Is that source [the high-ranking official] anonymous?" Lavrov asked, while speaking to journalists on Monday. "So, I believe that their conscience is unclear. As for the issue [not returning the Russian diplomatic property without any preconditions], I consider it daylight robbery," he said.The foreign minister added he hopes that the Trump administration has people with logic who understand that their predecessors in the Obama administration decided to seize the Russian property, as well as expel 35 Russian diplomats, in "a state of agony."
"It looks like some highway thieves are commenting on this situation," Lavrov added. "How is that: to seize property which was assigned by a bilateral intergovernmental ratified document, and to give it back they follow the principle, 'Mine is mine, and yours will be shared,'" Lavrov said.
"Washington not only did not rescind the decision to expel our employees, but also refuses to issue visas to those who must travel as replacements," Zakharova said at her weekly press briefing,At the same time, she also expressed hope that the US will adopt a more constructive approach to resolving the diplomatic property dispute after Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump met face-to-face for the first time last week.
"We expect that now, after the summit in Hamburg on July 7, the US side will show a more constructive approach," Zakharova surmised.Commenting on the issue, Russian political analyst Pavel Svyatenkov called the position of the US administration a means of pressuring Russia.
"The ongoing diplomatic conflict between Russia and the US is a form of pressure on Russia and Russia's Foreign Ministry. Why is it happening? Because President Trump is being forced to make excuses for his alleged "ties" with Russia, which is being constantly speculated about in the US media," he told Sputnik. Trump and his administration are being forced to demonstrate a tough position to be able to prove that these accusations are baseless, he added.

The Center explained that such Israeli practices are aimed at blocking the work of the international organizations in the Gaza Strip, pointing out that 8 employees working in these organizations have been arrested since the beginning of 2014.I find it odd that a UN employee has been in an Israeli prison for four days and there has been no statement from the international body. Is this how they come to the defense of their staff when it's under threat in a police state? I left a phone message with the UN press office seeking a statement, but have not heard from them so far.
It affirmed that hundreds of employees are denied the permits required to enter or exit Gaza to be able to follow up their organizations' work, not to mention the Israeli incitement campaigns they are exposed to.
Comment: The bloodless war narrative may be effective, but only to a degree and only for so long. While the media may not show the images, American families who have lost their sons and daughters know this narrative to be untrue. Suffering seeks to find an outlet one way or another. For example, see: Study shows Clinton lost because PA, WI, and MI have high casualty rates and saw her as pro-war