
Independent researchers have assembled evidence that has raised profound questions regarding the notion that WTC 7 collapsed because of fire.
For the first time, an ongoing peer reviewed academic study of the collapse of WTC 7, officially refutes the conclusion brought forward by NIST.On September 6, 2017, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of UAF's Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, presented some damning findings and conclusions detailed in his team's
September 2017 progress report regarding the collapse of World Trade Center building 7.
Over the past 16 years many highly respected
academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers forwarded by the U.S. government - with particular interest given to the collapse of WTC building 7.
The official government position elicited in the 2008 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings.
Now, for the first time, an ongoing peer reviewed academic study, WTC 7 Evaluation - is being conducted by Dr. J Leroy Husley of the University of Alaska-Fairbanks Institute of Northern Engineering - and it directly challenges the findings of the official NIST report.
Comment: Grab your popcorn. The Democratic Party may begin imploding over this.