OF THE
TIMES

"Some experts found it troubling that the children all had hugely dilated pupils, which is quite contrary to the known effect of this gas - sarin, which is very powerful nerve agent known to cause the victim's pupils to [contract], to be reduced to a size of a pin, pinpointed pupils," the diplomat explained. Alexander Shulgin [Russia's OPCW envoy] pointed out that JIM experts were well aware of this anomaly, but said "they were not asked to investigate this particular thing." Shulgin recalled how the Russian side was repeatedly told: "Don't worry, just wait for the JIM reports, we'll have all the answers." But in their conclusions "there is no hint as to what has happened to the children," he added.
...
The UN-OPCW mission has apparently, from the very beginning, settled on an aerial attack as the main theory behind the incident. Moscow, meanwhile, after examining the size and shape of the crater left from the explosion, continues to insist that the detonation and dispersal of the chemical agent likely occurred on the ground. Russia slammed the conclusions of JIM and questioned whether its mandate, which expires next week, should be renewed in its current form.
...
"We are of the view that the JIM report, the seventh report, has been established by a flagrant disregard of [the] basic higher standards of the Chemical Convention, UN Security Council resolutions and previous decisions by the ECE executive council. ... It is about the non-respect of the chain of custody, basic methods of investigation whereby samples should be taken by authorized experts who are expected to ensure their custody, in other terms, protection, all the way until a designated laboratory," Shulgin emphasized.
The JIM mission, which never actually visited the site of the alleged attack, instead relied on evidence collected by the militant groups controlling the area. The investigation also failed to properly inspect the Shayrat Airbase by not gathering ground samples there. Shulgin said JIM's team trusted data provided by questionable sources - the militants - while dismissing information offered by the Syrian government.
"It is about very skewed approach whereas information collected, provided by various NGOs affiliated with the terrorist armed groups are trusted, whereas the data, information provided by the Syrian authorities are at best ignored," he noted.
"They're political hacks," Trump said of the former CIA director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and former FBI chief James Comey, who have said that the evidence of Russian meddling is clear.
"You have Brennan, you have Clapper and you have Comey. Comey's proven now to be a liar and he's proven to be a leaker. So you look at that," Trump said. "And you have President Putin very strongly, vehemently says he had nothing to do with that."
But he fell short of saying that he took Putin's word.
"Well, look, I can't stand there and argue with him," Trump said. "I would rather have him get out of Syria, to be honest with you. I would rather ... get to work with him on the Ukraine rather than standing and arguing about whether or not- because that whole thing was set up by the Democrats."

Comment: One damp squib after another, and yet Russiagate refuses to die. That's what happens when an entire segment of the population loses its ability to reason in a sustained fit of hysteria. Because you can take it to the bank that some hardcore conspiracy theorists will be convinced that even the Carter Page testimony is slam-dunk evidence of Russian collusion. Sad.