Puppet MastersS


Mr. Potato

Carter Page: The sad and strange case of Russiagate's Walter Mitty

carter page
Carter Page
On 2nd November 2017 Carter Page, the former businessman and banker who was for a time a volunteer helper of the Trump campaign, gave evidence to the House Intelligence Committee, which is looking into the allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Carter Page is a pivotal figure in the collusion theory that lies at the heart of the Russiagate scandal.

His name appears in several places in the Trump Dossier - which Carter Page has now confirmed is the basis for the whole Russiagate investigation - with the focus being on two trips he made to Moscow last year, one in July 2016 when he gave a speech to Moscow's New Economic School, and one in December 2016 when some sections of the Russian media spoke of him - wrongly - as an emissary of President elect Trump.

On 22nd April 2017 in an article for The Duran I said that Carter Page is in reality a fantasist with only a tenuous grasp of reality.

He managed to get a place in the Trump campaign by exaggerating his qualifications and background - pretending to a Ph.D he does not have - whilst fooling some Russians (including the board of the New Economic School) into thinking that he was much closer to Donald Trump than he really was.

At the same time, like George Papadopoulos - the other Trump campaign aide who was recently indicted - he was trying to impress the Trump campaign by pretending to contacts with senior Russian officials which in reality he never had.

Comment: One damp squib after another, and yet Russiagate refuses to die. That's what happens when an entire segment of the population loses its ability to reason in a sustained fit of hysteria. Because you can take it to the bank that some hardcore conspiracy theorists will be convinced that even the Carter Page testimony is slam-dunk evidence of Russian collusion. Sad.


Cult

Media frenzy over accusations made against Rep candidate Moore contrasts with silence on Dem Senator Menendez's trial for child prostitution

Roy Moore and Bob Menendez
Never has the mainstream media bias been more evident than in the last 48 hours, as all three major broadcast networks have given heavy coverage to the allegations made against Alabama GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore, while the ongoing federal corruption trial of New Jersey Democratic Senator Bob Menendez - who was accused of hiring child prostitutes - has been largely ignored by these same outlets.

Menendez, who has been on trial for 65 days, is charged with taking tens of thousands of dollars in bribes in exchange for political favors. He faces a total of six counts of bribery, three counts of honest services fraud, one count of conspiracy, one count of interstate travel to carry out bribery and one count of making false statements on his congressional financial disclosures to conceal the crimes.

Despite being on trial for over two months, "ABC World News Tonight, CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News haven't even mentioned the trial once. NBC's Today also hasn't covered this trial at all, while ABC's Good Morning America and CBS This Morning have managed to give it one story each (1 minute, 48 seconds for ABC and 22 seconds for CBS)," according to the Media Research Center (MRC).

Attention

Did al-Qaeda dupe President Trump on Syrian attack?

USS Ross
© Petty Officer 3rd Class Robert S. PriceThe Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Ross fires a tomahawk land attack missile from the Mediterranean Sea at Syria, April 7, 2017.
Special Report: Buried deep inside a new U.N. report is evidence that could exonerate the Syrian government in the April 4 sarin atrocity and make President Trump look like an Al Qaeda dupe.

A new United Nations-sponsored report on the April 4 sarin incident in an Al Qaeda-controlled town in Syria blames Bashar al-Assad's government for the atrocity, but the report contains evidence deep inside its "Annex II" that would prove Assad's innocence.

If you read that far, you would find that more than 100 victims of sarin exposure were taken to several area hospitals before the alleged Syrian warplane could have struck the town of Khan Sheikhoun.

Still, the Joint Investigative Mechanism [JIM], a joint project of the U.N. and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons [OPCW], brushed aside this startling evidence and delivered the Assad guilty verdict that the United States and its allies wanted.

The JIM consigned the evidence of a staged atrocity, in which Al Qaeda operatives would have used sarin to kill innocent civilians and pin the blame on Assad, to a spot 14 pages into the report's Annex II. The sensitivity of this evidence of a staged "attack" is heightened by the fact that President Trump rushed to judgment and ordered a "retaliatory" strike with 59 Tomahawk missiles on a Syrian airbase on the night of April 6-7. That U.S. attack reportedly killed several soldiers at the base and nine civilians, including four children, in nearby neighborhoods.

So, if it becomes clear that Al Qaeda tricked President Trump not only would he be responsible for violating international law and killing innocent people, but he and virtually the entire Western political establishment along with the major news media would look like Al Qaeda's "useful idiots."

Comment: The official findings were obviously determined before the incidents were constructed. Execution of key scenarios was sloppy in both timing and evidence, mandating further scrutiny as to the true origin and intent of the attacks. The OPCW is questionably inept and compromised, a tool.

Additional from RT:
"Some experts found it troubling that the children all had hugely dilated pupils, which is quite contrary to the known effect of this gas - sarin, which is very powerful nerve agent known to cause the victim's pupils to [contract], to be reduced to a size of a pin, pinpointed pupils," the diplomat explained. Alexander Shulgin [Russia's OPCW envoy] pointed out that JIM experts were well aware of this anomaly, but said "they were not asked to investigate this particular thing." Shulgin recalled how the Russian side was repeatedly told: "Don't worry, just wait for the JIM reports, we'll have all the answers." But in their conclusions "there is no hint as to what has happened to the children," he added.
...
The UN-OPCW mission has apparently, from the very beginning, settled on an aerial attack as the main theory behind the incident. Moscow, meanwhile, after examining the size and shape of the crater left from the explosion, continues to insist that the detonation and dispersal of the chemical agent likely occurred on the ground. Russia slammed the conclusions of JIM and questioned whether its mandate, which expires next week, should be renewed in its current form.
...
"We are of the view that the JIM report, the seventh report, has been established by a flagrant disregard of [the] basic higher standards of the Chemical Convention, UN Security Council resolutions and previous decisions by the ECE executive council. ... It is about the non-respect of the chain of custody, basic methods of investigation whereby samples should be taken by authorized experts who are expected to ensure their custody, in other terms, protection, all the way until a designated laboratory," Shulgin emphasized.

The JIM mission, which never actually visited the site of the alleged attack, instead relied on evidence collected by the militant groups controlling the area. The investigation also failed to properly inspect the Shayrat Airbase by not gathering ground samples there. Shulgin said JIM's team trusted data provided by questionable sources - the militants - while dismissing information offered by the Syrian government.

"It is about very skewed approach whereas information collected, provided by various NGOs affiliated with the terrorist armed groups are trusted, whereas the data, information provided by the Syrian authorities are at best ignored," he noted.



Star of David

Sign of desperation: Israel lobby pushing for all-out ban on campus criticism of Israel

netanyahu, israel lobby, AIPAC
I guess it's a sign of desperation. Interest in Israel among young Jews is way down. And among the community at large, only 23 percent of Jewish voters list Israel as among their top three considerations when deciding for whom to vote. (A mere 6 percent say Israel is the No. 1 factor in casting their votes).

The election of Donald Trump only accelerated the decline in interest in Israel. Jews overwhelmingly opposed Trump in the November 2016 election. That opposition has only intensified as anti-Semitism has seriously spiked since his inauguration. It's lost on no one that the chant of the racist demonstrators at the violent "alt-right" riot in Charlottesville was, "The Jews will not replace us."

All in all, these are scary times for Jews right here at home. As for Israel, American Jewish discomfort with the occupation and Netanyahu's policies in general, combined with fears about developments in our own country, have moved it far from the center of Jewish concerns. Simply put, we have more immediate threats to worry about.

Accordingly, it appears that it's time for the Israel lobby (led by AIPAC but consisting of all the Jewish mainstream organizations) to scare Jews into worrying about anti-Semitism. But not the anti-Semitism of the "alt-right" and the more extreme Trump supporters but the supposed anti-Semitism of critics of Israel. (They know that progressive critics of Israel's behavior are safer targets than the real anti-Semites of the right, who are dangerously close to the Trump administration).

Comment: The Israeli government and its American supporters fear BDS because it has become quite popular, particularly on university campuses. More people are waking up to the fact that Israel is a rogue state engaging in actions that are widely considered to be both illegal and immoral.

America first: Pandering to the Jewish State has got to stop


Arrow Up

US lawmakers want greater military and diplomatic ties with Taiwan

McCaul, Pittenger, Cotton
© Congress.govMcCaul • Pittenger • Cotton
With President Donald Trump in China negotiating trade and discussing North Korea, several Republican lawmakers are advocating for greater diplomatic and military ties with Taiwan, a move that's likely to infuriate Beijing.

Representatives Michael McCaul (R-Texas) and Robert Pittenger (R-North Carolina) introduced the "Taiwan Security Act" in the House, while Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) introduced it in the upper chamber. The bill seeks to expand already strong military ties between the US and the disputed island in a range of ways.

It "reestablishes an annual strategic dialogue" between Washington and Taipei "in order to ensure the regular transfer of defense articles," the proposed bill states. It also envisages the US inviting the Taiwanese military to participate in the Pacific Rim (RIMPAC) naval exercises and Red Flag air combat exercises. Hosted by the US every two years in the Hawaiian islands, RIMPAC involves 26 countries and is the largest maritime military exercise in the world. The Red Flag air combat exercise includes 28 countries and is conducted over bombing and gunnery ranges at the Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada.

The proposed legislation also "expresses Congressional support" for Taiwan's plan to spend 3 percent of its gross domestic product on defense, and pushes for Taiwan to "suspend all economic ties" with North Korea.

Comment: Trump has choices to make regarding US relations with China and the way forward. Constant shows of military force should not be a convenient (and expensive) replacement for true diplomacy.


Stop

Why did Politico hide FusionGPS employment of key source?

4 boxes chart
© The Federalist
There's just one approach you have to take if you're a member of the media: undying fealty to Robert Mueller, no questions asked. Democracy dies in darkness, as we all know. On Monday, Politico ran a story criticizing the Wall Street Journal for failing to adopt the political groupthink that pervades most of the media elite.

It's not enough that the vast majority of mainstream media operate as the communications arm of the Democratic Party. Any deviation from this approach results in strong criticism by other journalists. One media writer even criticized Fox News for mentioning the conclusion of a corruption and bribery trial of sitting U.S. Senator Bob Menendez this week. Apparently they were supposed to spend the entire day spreading hysteria about Trump's criminal collusion with Russia to steal an election that was Hillary Clinton's birthright - never mind the lack of evidence - to the exclusion of all other news.

So Politico runs "Murdoch-owned outlets bash Mueller, seemingly in unison." As stupid as the headline is, the subhed gets stupider: "After resisting opportunities to take Trump's line on Russia, the Wall Street Journal editorial page goes all in."

Comment: See also: Clinton's fake Russian dossier - symptomatic of bigger problem


Snakes in Suits

Pierson: Clinton campaign accusing others of 'exactly what they're guilty of'

killaries
© Pinterest/KJN
Moments ago, appearing on Risk and Reward, Katrina Pierson discussed how Donna Brazile's revelations show the hypocrisy and corruption of the Clinton campaign.

Finally, somebody was telling the truth about what many of us already assumed and that is that the Clinton campaign no longer colluded but they are corrupt. She has told us the truth, that the DNC did rig the primary process in favor of Hillary Clinton. But I think her most salient observation here is the hypocrisy that happened inside the Clinton campaign. The entire time Hillary Clinton ran a campaign on sexism, she accused all of her critics of being sexist including Bernie Sanders. All the while, her own campaign team were engaging in such practices so she has let all of us know that the Clinton campaign has one bad habit and that is accusing everyone else of doing exactly what they're guilty of.


Comment: Perhaps the DNC tide is beginning to turn. Tsunami warnings in the near future?


Target

Trump slams former intel chiefs after meeting with Putin: 'They're political hacks'

Trump and Putin
While President Donald Trump was effectively forced to cancel a formal meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin due to the glare of the Mueller indictments - despite the fact that the charges had seemingly little to do with his campaign - the two leaders still took a minute to chat on the sidelines of an Asia Pacific conference in Vietnam on Saturday. Photos captured Putin ominously whispering a message into his surrogate's ear, before posing for a few photos alongside other world leaders, with one photo featuring a much discussed handshake between Putin and Trump.

Afterward, when reporters asked if he was worried about the Mueller probe, Trump repeated his allegation that the investigation is a 'hoax', with the president calling the FBI a "bunch of hacks," according to the New York Post.
"They're political hacks," Trump said of the former CIA director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and former FBI chief James Comey, who have said that the evidence of Russian meddling is clear.

"You have Brennan, you have Clapper and you have Comey. Comey's proven now to be a liar and he's proven to be a leaker. So you look at that," Trump said. "And you have President Putin very strongly, vehemently says he had nothing to do with that."

But he fell short of saying that he took Putin's word.

"Well, look, I can't stand there and argue with him," Trump said. "I would rather have him get out of Syria, to be honest with you. I would rather ... get to work with him on the Ukraine rather than standing and arguing about whether or not- because that whole thing was set up by the Democrats."

Target

Speaker Volodin: Duma will mirror response to US' targeting RT

volodin
© Vladimir Fedorenko / SputnikState Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin, left, speaks at a State Duma plenary meeting.
The chair of the Russian lower house has said that the recent US order for RT to register as a foreign agent should prompt similar measures against American mass media engaged in "unconcealed interference" in Russia's internal politics.

"It would be the right thing to do if our parliamentary committee [for information policy] develops some proposals that mirror the US actions and protect the citizens of our country from the unconcealed interference that the US mass media has unfolded on Russian territory," Vyacheslav Volodin was quoted as saying by RIA Novosti.

"We will try to draft the proposal at the Duma council on Tuesday and vote on it at the plenary session on Wednesday, it is possible that we will pass the motion within one week," Volodin said.

The statement came in response to the US Department of Justice's ultimatum for RT America to register as a foreign agent before November 13, threatening to freeze the company's assets and arrest its head if this does not happen. RT's editor-in-chief, Margarita Simonyan, said in an interview with Channel 1 television that the broadcaster would have to comply with the demand.

Comment: Are media wars poised to spin out of control?


Chess

Putin promises 'tit-for-tat' response to US attack on Russian media

putin
President Vladimir Putin says that Moscow will resort to reciprocal measures in response to US steps against Russian media, which he called an "attack on freedom of speech." On Thursday, Washington ordered RT America to register as a foreign agent.

"The attack on our media is an attack on freedom of speech without any doubt. We are disappointed," Putin said at a news briefing at the APEC summit in Vietnam on Saturday. He added that the Russian parliament is currently discussing the response and voicing "tough suggestions."

"But we will definitely respond and it [the response] will be reciprocal," the Russian president warned. Putin stressed that the media's role is to provide information and express their perspective.