Puppet Masters
A newly-released document from the Senate Judiciary Committee says Steele wrote an additional memo, besides the controversial dossier, using information that came from the Clinton campaign.
The newly-released memorandum is an unclassified and heavily-redacted version of the criminal referral targeting Steele, filed on January 4 by Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham. It is addressed to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Director of the FBI Christopher Wray.
The report reveals coordination between the extended Clinton circle and the Obama administration in an attempt to source damaging information about then-candidate Trump.
When I read the GOP memorandum late yesterday a few hours after it was published it became immediately obvious to me why the Democrats, the Justice Department and the FBI had so strenuously resisted publishing it.
Briefly, the GOP memorandum sets out an astonishing and deeply disturbing story of selective information being provided to the FISA court in order to obtain a surveillance warrant against the Trump aide Carter Page notwithstanding that no evidence existed of any wrongdoing on his part other than - apparently - the Trump Dossier, whose compiler Christopher Steele was known by the FBI in October 2016 to have lied to them.
GOP Memorandum is a legal analysis and is the work of Gowdy not Nunes
In order to understand its importance an essential point about the GOP memorandum must be made.
Contrary to what some are saying, the GOP memorandum most definitely is a legal analysis or document and it is one which is written by a lawyer. That means that it must be read as a legal analysis or document, and it is to misunderstand it if it is read in any other way.
"The scenario where a US-backed, US-supplied jihadist group in Syria uses US weapons to shoot down a Russian plane and then murders the pilot on the ground should be seen as a near-nightmare escalation, drawing the US and Russia terrifyingly closer to direct conflict."McAdams is not fearmongering; he is stating a plainly obvious fact. The Trump administration has just announced that it is restructuring its nuclear weapons policy to take a more aggressive stance toward Russia than that which was held by the previous administration. This is coming after this administration's decision to arm Ukraine against Russia, a move Obama refused to take for fear of escalating tensions with Moscow, as well as its decision to continue to occupy Syria in order to effect regime change, along with numerous other escalations. The Council on Foreign Relations, which is without exaggeration as close to the voice of the US establishment as you can possibly get, is now openly admitting that the "United States is currently in a second Cold War with Russia."
In a recent interview with The Real News, leading US-Russian relations expert Stephen Cohen repeated his ongoing warning that "this new Cold War is much more dangerous, much more likely to end in Hot War, than was the 40-year of Cold War, which we barely survived." In a previous interview with the same outlet, Cohen elaborated more extensively:
"We are in new cold war that is much more dangerous than the last cold war for various reasons. One is that the new cold war today, as we talk, includes three fronts. U.S.-Russian fronts, they're fought with hot war. That's Syria. That's the reckless NATO military build-up on Russia's western boarders, which has resulted in a situation today that ordinarily artillery, not missiles, ordinary artillery, can hit Russia's second city of Saint Petersburg. Just think about that and the instability. And the third front is Ukraine."
Comment: It's a nice thought, but one can't assume they will not necessarily obey. When the guys with their fingers on the button are essentially psychopaths, there is no rhyme or reason to their actions. Thinking that they will simply 'obey' is a bit naive. What's needed is a widespread understanding of ponerology, and then perhaps we might have a chance. Or we keep playing with lady luck until it runs out.

Anti-riot police vehicles form a blockade in a sealed off area surrounding the Dutch embassy on March 12, 2017 in Ankara.
"The Dutch government has decided to officially withdraw the Netherlands' ambassador in Ankara, who has not had access to Turkey since March 2017," the ministry wrote in a statement.
It also said that the ministry would not accept the appointment of a new Turkish ambassador. "As long as the Netherlands has no ambassador to Turkey, the Netherlands will also not issue permission for a new Turkish ambassador to take up duties in the Netherlands."
Comment: Seems Turkey is making clear to their associates in the EU where their interests lie.

A nuclear-powered United States aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean Sea, 2010.
"We are facing," the NDS declared, "increased global disorder...creating a security environment more complex and volatile than any we have experienced in recent memory." That may read as correct to you, but the Pentagon isn't talking about catastrophic climate change, debilitating inequality, or the destabilizing flows and misery of millions of displaced refugees.
No, the NDS focus is the threat of Cold War adversaries. As Defense Secretary Jim Mattis put it in presenting the document, "[W]e will continue to prosecute the campaign against terrorists that we are engaged in today, but Great Power competition, not terrorism, is now the primary focus of U.S. national security."
China and Russia are described as "revisionist powers" posing a genuine threat to the world: "[They] want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model-gaining veto authority over other nations' economic, diplomatic, and security decisions," the NDS said.
Comment: In other words - more of the same. While the US is in the midst of a breakdown, the war mongering psychos in the military are keen on dragging everyone down with them.
Sure enough, the first official statement by top House and Senate Democrats after the memo dropped, was to write a letter to Pres. Trump warning that use of the newly-released memo as a pretext to fire either Special Counsel Bob Mueller or Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein could spark a constitutional crisis.
Comment: Conservative Daily Post adds:
The memo details how Obama officials used the politically-charged dossier, which was given nearly $10 million from the Democratic National Committee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, to get a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to spy on Trump's 2016 campaign.The last are brave words. Right now Trump is probably strategizing for his very political life as to how to proceed from here.
It also revealed the FISA warrant wouldn't have been secured had the dossier not been used.
Chuck, Nancy, and their cronies are freaking out because the memo unearths deeply rooted corruption at the DOJ and FBI.
And if Democrats believe threatening Trump is a good idea, they have another think coming.
What drives Adam Schiff's never ending Russia hysteria?
When in doubt follow the money. Congressman Schiff's well documented Putin obsession may have something to do with his billionaire, military complex, oligarch patron from Ukraine.
In a Zerohedge post yesterday, chronicling the latest Adam Schiff idiocy, where the Democrat Congressman spoke to a crowd at the University of Pennsylvania, declaring Russian ads promoted the Second Amendment during the 2016 election "so we will kill each other" commenter AlaricBalth linked some interesting information on Schiff's underlying motivation behind his Russia hysteria...
Comment: Looks bad, Schiff. How abut a little more disclosure on your part, instead of Trump having to call you out on your Nunes memo comments?
Trump tweets: 'Little' Adam Schiff a 'leaker and liar'
Schiff responded by telling Trump to do executive duties rather than tweeting.
Labeling him "Little Adam Schiff," Trump accused the Democrat of being one of the "biggest liars and leakers in Washington."

Hamas militants hold weapons as they celebrate the release of Palestinian prisoner Mohammed al-Bashiti, who served 12 years in an Israeli jail after he was convicted of being a member of Hamas' armed wing, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip July 25, 2016
The report suggests that the Palestinian Islamic fundamentalist organization Hamas, among other Palestinian factions, assesses the chances of war with Israel "at 95 percent," claiming it could break out within days or even hours.
Referring to unnamed sources, who met Hamas political chief Yahya Sinwar, the report says that Palestinians believed Israel would use a training exercise planned near the enclave to launch an attack on it. Hamas, for its part, has reinforced security measures across the Strip, evacuating sites and headquarters.
Israeli media outlet Haaretz has also published the report, however, stated that it "exaggerated" the imminent threat of a war, describing it as part of Hamas's attempt to "ratchet up international discussion" over the humanitarian plight in Gaza and non-implementation of the reconciliation agreement between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.
Comment: Israel created Hamas as a counterweight to the Palestinian Authority of Yasser Arafat. They seem to have retained their value as a bogeyman that Israel can call upon when needed.
- Hamas is a Creation of Mossad
- Israel created Hamas to split Palestine
- Is Israel Deliberately Strengthening Hamas?
"The decision by the US government in favor of new tactical nuclear weapons shows that the spiral of a new nuclear arms race is already under way," Gabriel said in a statement, noting that "like the Cold War times, we in Europe are in particular danger."
The newly-released US Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) refers to Russia's nuclear modernization as one of the reasons to renovate and upgrade the US nuclear arsenals making them more mobile by developing new, low-yield nuclear weapons.












Comment: See also: The Memo: An in-depth analysis of rampant abuse and possible contempt of Court