Puppet MastersS


Star of David

The end of Israeli exceptionalism

Netanyahu
© Jack Guez/Pool/Getty ImagesIsraeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu
Israel has now been at war with its neighbours for nearly two years. The latest round began with the Hamas-led terrorist attack on 7 October 2023. In response, West Jerusalem launched an aggressive military campaign that has since expanded to touch nearly every country in the region. The escalation has placed the Jewish state at the centre of Middle Eastern geopolitics once again - this time, dragging in Iran, a state that had long avoided direct confrontation through strategic caution. Now, even Tehran finds itself under fire, with US backing making the stakes far higher. Iran is left facing a grim choice between the bad and the very bad.

But this isn't about Iran. It's about Israel, a country that has for decades functioned as the West's forward operating base in the Middle East. Since the mid-20th century, Israel has enjoyed a privileged position - a bridgehead of Western power in a volatile region, while also deeply enmeshed in its politics and rivalries. Its success has rested on two pillars: the unshakable support of the United States, and its own internal capacity for innovation, military strength, and a unique social model.

That second pillar, however, has weakened. The clearest sign is in demographics: Israel is facing rising negative migration. In 2024, some 82,700 people are expected to leave the country - a 50% increase from the year before. It is not the unskilled or disengaged who are leaving, but the young and educated. The people who are needed to sustain a modern state are choosing to go.

Comment: Superb analysis. Those who awaken and comprehend are those who will opt to leave.


Better Earth

Best of the Web: World needs 'fundamentally new development model' - Putin

Putin
© Vyacheslav Prokofiev/RIA NovostiRussian President Vladimir Putin
The global system must pivot away from neocolonialism, which enabled the 'golden billion' to siphon resources for the elites, the Russian president says.

The world needs a new development model that is not based on the principles of neocolonialism and is resilient to political manipulation, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said.

Speaking on Friday at a plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin stated that throughout the past several decades, the so-called 'golden billion' has been pumping out resources from other nations to benefit the interests of a narrow circle of elites. He pointed to the example of the US, saying the country's "super incomes" never actually reached ordinary citizens or the middle class.

The Russian president insisted that changes in the political sphere should be reflected in the people's quality of life, in education, science, and infrastructure. He called for a "fundamentally new development model, one that is not built on the rules of neocolonialism."

Comment: As service-to-self economies prove unsustainable, BRICS offers rising prosperity to the many.


No Entry

Pentagon and US intel chiefs sidelined from Iran‑Israel discussions

Gabbard
© Andrew Harnik/Getty ImagesDirector of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard
President Donald Trump is reportedly relying on a small group of lower-profile aides as he weighs military intervention.

US President Donald Trump has excluded Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard from high-level discussions on the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, NBC News and the Washington Post have reported, citing senior administration officials.

Gabbard's sidelining, according to NBC, reportedly stems from her public and internal pushback against the official US and Israeli narrative that Tehran is on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons.

Hegseth has also been edged out of operational discussions, with the Washington Post reporting that two four-star generals overseeing the deployment of additional US military assets in the Middle East have taken the lead.

Cardboard Box

Opting for isolation will lead the US to bankrupt its own future

Flag tariffs
For much of the 20th century, the US persuaded the world that open, rules-based trade was good. Yet today Washington invokes a catch-all claim of "national security" to justify tariffs, export bans, and sanctions that make commerce resemble trench warfare.

Supply chains are splintering, allies are hedging, and American firms are losing the very global scale that once underpinned their dominance. If this weaponized trade posture endures, the US will not merely weaken its competitors; it will bankrupt its own future while accelerating a poorer, more divided world. Economic power has never been sustained by crippling others but by outperforming them.

Two strategic blunders set the stage. First, policymakers elevated a strong-dollar doctrine that delights bond markets but prices US factories out of global bids. Second, the 2017 tax overhaul slashed rates for the wealthy while gutting full research-and-development deductions, steering capital away from labs and toward short-term financial engineering. Add to that the 20 years of trillion-dollar overseas wars that left domestic infrastructure to decay. As a result, the US entered the 2020s with eroded supply chains, swelling debt and flagging productivity. Confronting these self-inflicted wounds would require patience and investment. Unfortunately, scapegoating foreigners proved politically cheaper.

Biohazard

Putin: Iran has the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes

Vladimir Putin St. Petersburg International Economic Forum
© Sputnik / Sergey BobylevRussian President Vladimir Putin attends a plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in St. Petersburg, Russia.
Iran has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said in an interview. After the plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) on Friday, he spoke with Nadim Koteich, the moderator of the session and general manager of Sky News Arabia.

"We believe that Iran has the right to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes. And we are prepared, as we have been in previous years, to provide the necessary support in this field," the Russian president said.

Putin added that Russia opposes the spread of nuclear weapons in any country. "The International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] confirms that there is no evidence of Iranian efforts to acquire nuclear weapons."

Bad Guys

Best of the Web: The Iran trap: Everyone wants Americans to fight their wars for them

israel iran flags trump
One of the defining aspects of Ukraine's strategy in the war against Russia is escalation - Not so much in terms of damage to Russia, but in terms of western involvement. Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky has made it his primary mission to convince western allies that their direct intervention in the war is absolutely necessary. Why? He asserts that Ukraine is the "guardian at the gate" supposedly preventing Russia from steamrolling through Europe.

The claim is absurd for a few reasons.

First, NATO officials and the establishment media have spent the better part of the last three years claiming that Russia was on the ropes and their military was crippled. Now, suddenly, as it becomes clear that Ukraine is losing the war badly (a result I predicted at the beginning of the conflict), those same people are asserting that Russia has the ability to invade multiple countries and rampage through the EU.

Second, we've heard the "domino effect" argument before. The public was fooled by the same idea during the Vietnam War. The notion that Americans MUST play world police in every fight or face a series of toppling catastrophes is a lie that has plagued our society for generations. The fact of the matter is, most wars have nothing to do with us.

Comment:



Star of David

AIPAC pelting Democrats with demands to "stand with Israel" on Iran

netanyahu
© Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty ImagesSmug Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrives in the Capitol on February 6, 2025.
The pro-Israel lobbying group has sent a flurry of communications to members of Congress, citing specific language for them to parrot in support of Israel's strikes on Iran.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has been furiously urging House Democrats to release messages of steadfast support for Israel in its war with Iran, the Prospect and Drop Site News have learned, even as bipartisan lawmakers come together on a War Powers Act resolution to prevent U.S. troops or funds being used in yet another Middle East conflagration.

One member relayed that a colleague had received literally 100 phone calls from members of AIPAC and its allied pressure groups. AIPAC wants House Democratic members to state explicitly that they "stand with Israel" in its actions against Iran aimed at destroying the Islamic Republic's nuclear capability, and add that Iran "must never have a nuclear weapon."

Comment: Unfortunately the odds of the MIC listening are almost zero.




Bad Guys

A dangerous moment: The targeting of Tulsi Gabbard

tulsi gabbard deep state
For the sake of urgency I'm going to talk in direct and bold terms about the targeting of Tulsi Gabbard. The IC system is attempting to remove her as a disruptive influence by using Iran as a wedge to get her out, but the issue they have with Director Gabbard has nothing to do with Iran.

CTH approaches this after being very concerned about Tulsi Gabbard's ability. Not because of intent, but rather we doubted her understanding of the scope of the IC opposition aligned against an effective Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Gabbard started out with these weaknesses, but she learned quickly - grasped the opposition- and has become a transformative force within the Intelligence Community. Director Gabbard's recent efforts within the Intelligence Community Inspector General office is another feather in her cap of competence. Gabbard is now a threat.

Star of David

Israel's war on Iran is not about nuclear weapons

Israel soldiers IDF
© Mostafa Alkharouf / Anadolu via Getty Images
The claim that has been adopted by the United States, Israel and its European partners, that the attack on Iran was a "pre-emptive" attempt to stop Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons, is demonstrably false. It holds about as much weight as the allegations against Iraq's Saddam Hussein in 2003 and this war of aggression is just as illegal.

For the best part of four decades, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been claiming that Iran is on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon. Yet, every single attempt to strike a deal which would bring more monitoring and restrictions to Iran's nuclear program has been systematically dismantled by Israel and its powerful lobbying groups in Western capitals.

In order to properly assess Israel's attack on Iran, we have to establish the facts in this case. The Israeli leadership claim to have launched a pre-emptive strike, but have presented no evidence to support their allegations that Iran was on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon. Simply stating this does not serve as proof, it is a claim, similar to how the US told the world Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.

Light Sabers

Fyodor Lukyanov: Here's how the West made Israel-Iran war possible

fire smoke
© Getty ImagesFire and smoke rise into the sky after an Israeli attack on the Shahran oil depot • June 15, 2025 • Tehran, Iran.
The fantasy of liberal reform has given us the ruins of war.

Israel's attack on Iran, which began last Friday, is the culmination of nearly 25 years of relentless transformation across West Asia. This war was not born overnight, nor can it be explained by simplistic moral binaries. What we see now is the natural outcome of a series of miscalculations, misread ambitions, and power vacuums.

There are no neat lessons to be learned from the last quarter-century. The events were too disjointed, the consequences too contradictory. But that doesn't mean they lacked logic. If anything, the unfolding chaos is the most coherent evidence of where Western interventionism, ideological naivety, and geopolitical arrogance have led.

Collapse of the Framework

For much of the 20th century, the Middle East was kept within a fragile but functioning framework, largely defined by Cold War dynamics. Superpowers patronized local regimes, and the balance - while far from peaceful - was stable in its predictability.

But the end of the Cold War, and with it the dissolution of the Soviet Union, dissolved those rules. For the next 25 years, the United States stood uncontested in the region. The ideological battle between "socialism" and the "free world" vanished, leaving a vacuum that new forces quickly sought to fill.

Washington tried to impose the values of Western liberal democracy as universal truths. Simultaneously, two other trends emerged: political Islam, which ranged from reformist to radical, and the reassertion of authoritarian secular regimes as bulwarks against collapse. Paradoxically, Islamism - though ideologically opposed to the West - aligned more closely with liberalism in its resistance to autocracy. Meanwhile, those same autocracies were often embraced as the lesser evil against extremism.