
© Robyn Beck/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
The city of
Los Angeles declared a state of fiscal emergency amid a $1 billion deficit. The council approved of the emergency declaration unanimously in a 14-0 vote. This comes after Mayor Karen Bass approved a $14 billion budget for the fiscal year that began on July 1.
The city is a prime example of what happens when socialist policies are allowed to run rampant at the expense of the people.
© Armstrong EconomicsDeficit Quote Reagan - Government Spending.
Bass approved of raising the budget from $12.9 billion in FY2024-25 to $14 billion in 2025-26 despite the looming $1 billion deficit.
Unsurprisingly, overspending is the main culprit for the deficit, and yet, lawmakers have every intention of spending more. Over 600 public sector workers will be let go as a result of fiscal mismanagement, and although small government is usually applaudable,
the city plans to fire 248 LAPD employees, 44 sanitation workers, and 41 firefighters. LA is experiencing a significant uptick in crime, but plans to defund the police to appease the mobs.
California Governor Gavin Newsom boasts of California's robust economy but fails to acknowledge that it's a state basically living "paycheck-to-paycheck," with the payee being the taxpayer.
Read the state's plan to cover its budget deficits - endless taxes. Spending growth from 2025-26 to 2028-29 is 5.8%, above the average of 3.5%. Growth over the same period is just above 4%, "lower than its historical average, largely due to policy choices that end during the forecast window. Taken together, we view it as unlikely that revenue growth will be fast enough to catch up to ongoing spending." Even residents who choose or are forced to leave the state will incur taxes to cover government thievery.
Los Angeles is one of countless examples of how the public sector will virtue signal to rob Peter, not to pay Paul, but to pay themselves, as they are not hiding the corruption.
Liability costs totaled $546 million in the past years, as there have been numerous lawsuits, mainly involving the Los Angeles Police Department, which is forbidden by law to enforce order. The city refused to budget for these growing legal battles. Not only does the city plan to fire officers, but they also reduced hiring by 50% last year, recruiting 240 new officers instead of the 480 needed to patrol the city.

© Armstrong Economics
I've reported numerous times how
California uses the homeless epidemic to fund NGOs that merely steal from the taxpayers. Mayor Bass stated she plans to cut 10% of funding to the "Inside Safe" program. The city has spent millions on combating homelessness, and the numbers continue to rise.
Crime is more expensive than funding the LAPD. Criminals have cost the city of Los Angeles an estimated
$7.6 billion annually. Gang violence alone costs the city around
$1 billion per year, according to the Vera Institute of Justice, which is half of the annual budget of the LAPD. The California Department of Justice has acknowledged that property crime has risen in recent years and accounts for 60-70% of total losses. Yet, violent demonstrations are permitted to occur whenever Washington enacts a policy that displeases the Democrats.
Blue policies such as the net-zero climate initiative have caused businesses to flee Los Angeles and California as a whole.
From 2020 to the present day, over 164 companies have left California. In the last year,
12 major companies like SpaceX, Chevron, X, and KFC have fled CA for TX. Los Angeles shed 106 corporate headquarters between 2018 and 2024, the second-highest number of losses in US metros behind San Francisco/San Jose.

© Apu Gomes / AFP via Getty Images
Taxpayers are fleeing the state en masse. State and local taxes are among the highest in the nation and disproportionately harm the middle and upper classes to fund the growing public sector. Energy costs have skyrocketed, with major refiners abandoning California.
Gas is expected to rise 75% by 2026, and residents are already paying the highest price for gas in the nation. The cost of living is exorbitant. Those who can have already fled as the government must continue to leech of the taxpayers to fund their failures.
There should be checks and balances against these elected officials who recklessly spend with no end in sight. Downsizing the police force is a political move that will only cause crime and the costs associated with crime to rise.
Los Angeles is becoming a failed city as a direct result of socialist policies that have historically NEVER worked.
Reader Comments
"(whitecoast) In the official Canadian election results Carney and the Liberals won 44% of the vote and the Conservatives won 41%. What percentage of real, non-rigged Canadian votes went for each? A: 48 to conservatives. 35 to libs."
Lots of other goodies too !
[Link]
"(whitecoast) In the official Canadian election results Carney and the Liberals won 44% of the vote and the Conservatives won 41%. What percentage of real, non-rigged Canadian votes went for each? A: 48 to conservatives. 35 to libs."
Lots of other goodies too !
[Link]
US citizens will have to dig deep in order to run these elite, opinionated, indoctrinated, parasites out of town and out of washingtub. Many are simple bastards born from the immoral lives of the 'ruling class' and many elite families are related to each other through these ties.
BTW, many of these old elite families, if not all, made their fortunes either through slavery, selling drugs, or supplying arms. Try finding an honest man amongst that lot.
Maybe they think the color of their socialist/communist flag is also most appropriate for their budget ...
What you are referring to is 'Liberals' - Liberals are what you fondly call 'socialists' in the USA, but that's just indoctrination from the wealthy. Liberals are enthusiastic capitalists, while socialists and communists want to destroy the capitalist system. All states, cities and countries in the west are deeply pro-capitalist, and so are not 'socialist'. 'Communism' does not exist anywhere.
In the whole world only China and Cuba can claim to be sort of socialist countries, and even they have not yet achieved it properly.
But check any West-European metropolean city - what political parties the inhabitants voted for, what party the mayor belongs to, their taxpayer / welface recipient ratio, their "immigrant" population, and what their budget situation is.
Do you think I was joking, or making things up ?
Include Vietnam as a yet workers state. And North Korea.
Not only did they try to kill us all not so long ago - only through pharmacide, not by firing squads.
And most neocons are in fact the direct descendants of Trotzkyites - the most radical and violent Bolshevik faction that got cast out by Stalin and emigrated to ... the US.
No. What I said was that your understanding of political terms and theories or movements, has been heavily propagandised by the mere fact of having been brought up and educated in the USA. For the last 150 or so years the rich in the US have mounted a very effective campaign to demonise and destroy any working class socialism, using both propaganda and organised thuggery to break strikes. You can read about it, if you care to.
To your point about various 'parties' - these parties are not 'left'. They are Neo-liberal at best. Take the UK 'Labour' Party. This party, while claiming to stand for workers, and being supported by trade-unions, is and always has been a pro-capitalist party. It has always acted and spoken against the UK Communist Party and other left parties like the SWP (Socialist Workers Party). Right now it is trying to increase armaments spending and cut welfare spending. The same is true for all the other parties you think are left just because they may have 'socialist' in their names. (Even the Nazi party had 'socialist' in its name, but it murdered thousands of communists and trade-unionists). The only European party right now which is 'left' is the BSW (Bund Sahrah Wagener), and it is not anywhere near a position of power.
As for living in China, you should read an unbiased account of what it is like. Fast, efficient bus and train services, all the consumer goods you could want, a democratic system which is based on local autonomy, NO-ONE LIVING IN POVERTY, (not as in the USA) etc. However, you'll have to go a long way round to get a true picture if you live in the US.
Illustrative joke:
Russian refugee to the US is asked 'What's the difference between the USSR and the USA. He answers "in the US, they actually believe their own propaganda". True
Your reflexive responce is akin to that which led the medical and scientific communites to get onboard, groupthinked, into the Covid and lockdown racket.
When the matter under discussion is beyond your scope of practice it's best bow out under that aegis. That is the honourale course of action.
It was the Khazar Trotzki (Bronstein) with his followers who wanted to carry the "communist revolution" to the whole world with violence - not Stalin. In the very same way folks were pressed into the red army by Trozki's underlings : It was the Trotzki faction that advertized for war against whole Euope for a start, to make them socialist up to the Algarve.
The purges and show trials were the response of the other faction, led by Stalin. And because Trotzki couldn't help himself and continue scheming for an overthrow of the government even in Mexican exile, he was finally removed from the picture.
Trotzi's menace lives on in form of the US, European and Israeli neocons. Mostly grand children of original Trotzkyists, they still want the same violent world revolution. Color doesn't matter so much anymore.
assetman Trotzky was, here a quote from Trotzky-glorifying Wackopedia : Oh, and by the way - wasn't there another famous world-arsonist visiting the UK for a prolonged period a few years before he began to set the world on fire ?!?Ned Ludd you should accept defeat on this one!
And apply some common sense. All the "psychopathic monster killed millions of citizen" are almost explusivles Western (mostly British) propaganda tropes. There were almost always very real and rational reasons for leaders and their followers to act that way.
And second, I think it's very worth pondering why certain people (like Trotzky) are glorified be certain Western mainstream court historians. Trotzky (and Lenin, and Hitler) staying for prolonged periods in London might have to do with it, I would say ...
As for the London part, various scheming groups wanted Germany to defeat Russia so it could once again take on its initial mission "to set the world on fire"(as you so aptly put it).
Sadly now though those same schemers and deceivers are in good position to move forward with those original plans...
And instead of just the Gestapo working from names in shoe boxes there are A.I. datacenters world wide...
The real purpose of illegal immigration is to erase cultural identity, so no legitimate leadership is possible. That leaves a void for illegitimate leadership to inhabit. On the one hand, this puts pressure on people to develop their individual sense of authority, which is an important next step in human evolution. On the other hand, massive corruption and chaos is inevitable - a literal devil's playground - because many people have yet to realize the necessity of accessing their own latent moral and ethical center. It's a difficult transition we're beginning here, but it's a necessary one in human evolution.
Spread the word! It would be valuable for people to begin framing what's happening in these terms, I think.
To me it is obvious that migration is controlled by the intelligence agencies(almost exclusively at this point). It is one of the principle weapons they use against us (controlling our movement or forcing it upon us).
Let me know what you think about that? To me Eugenics is alive and well with Technocracy transhumanism especially the remark at the very end "and the test tube bears watching"...