
Faculty "feel obligated to open students' eyes to the inequality that surrounds them," Finlay explained, but that takes the form of "continuous pressure in the classroom to embrace visions of wholesale societal reform."
The message, hammered relentlessly into students' heads at Horace Mann, is that "the system is broken, unable to be reformed, rotten to the core, and deserving of demolition," he wrote.
The irony of hyper-privileged New Yorkers paying nearly $60,000 a year for their children to learn they are the undeserving beneficiaries of a broken system need not be dwelled upon here. Finlay's essay breaks the self-imposed conspiracy of silence that has largely shielded top private schools from criticism from within.
There have been rare exceptions of dissident teachers like Paul Rossi of the Grace School and "Brearley Dad" Andrew Gutmann, who blow the whistle on private-school indoctrination. But few are willing to do so publicly. The largely unquestioned proposition is that private prep schools are the gateway to elite universities and America's leadership class, an academic arms race famously described in a New York magazine cover story 25 years ago as "Give me Harvard, or give me death."

Wealthy parents can afford to purchase billboards anonymously demanding elite private schools teach their kids "how to think, not what to think." But they cannot afford to put at risk their children's shot at the Ivy League, so they sit and seethe, lest their children be deemed not a good fit and "counseled out."
The more troubling picture Finlay paints is of a drifting and deeply anti-intellectual institution. It's a devastating strike at the heart of another story affluent parents comfort themselves with: that the obscene price they pay for elite private school is not about protecting their privilege. Given the chaotic state of public education, there's simply no other way for children to get a rich and stimulating education. But Finlay makes clear, the object of social-justice-related curricula at Horace Mann "is not for the material to be challenged, but absorbed without question."

In the end, exclusive private schools have led themselves into a box canyon from which there can be no honest escape. Like an organism that devours its host, their commitment to equity, inclusivity and "dismantling privilege" requires privileged New Yorkers continue spending north of half a million dollars in tuition for their children to learn that their privileges are unearned and undeserved.
And what reason do elite universities' admissions offices have to continue to look favorably upon on prep-school graduates when they too are committed to equity? Surely an Ivy League acceptance letter is wasted on someone who was born on third base.
Unless, of course, it's all a cynical exercise with all involved — parents and faculty alike — believing their professed commitment to social justice insures them against practicing what they preach.
Because let's be honest. There's really only one surefire way for elite private schools to demonstrate their commitment to dismantling privilege: close their doors and cease operations.



and this is entirely true. I'd agree