OF THE
TIMES
Dominick Black was the first person to testify in the trial, taking the stand as the prosecution's first witness. Black bought the rifle for Rittenhouse months before the shootings because he was not old enough to own one at the time.RT reports on more testimony:
Black faces his own trial for buying the 17-year-old Rittenhouse an AR-15-style rifle he wasn't old enough to legally possess. He testified on Tuesday that he was stunned when Rittenhouse called him seconds after the first shooting.
"I didn't believe the gunshots were actually his until I got a phone call, and I answered it, and he just said, 'I shot somebody, I shot somebody,'" Black recounted.
Black said he was on the rooftop when he heard gunshots but didn't know Rittenhouse was involved until Rittenhouse called and said, "I shot somebody, I shot somebody."
Afterward, Black said, Rittenhouse was "freaking out. He was really scared. He was pale, shaking a lot." Black said Rittenhouse told him that he acted in self-defense because "people were trying to hurt him."
Richie McGinniss, who witnessed the Kyle Rittenshouse shooting first-hand, has told the jury that one of the men killed was attempting to get hold of Rittenhouse's rifle at the very moment the teen pulled the trigger.That Rittenhouse is even being subjected to a trial is a travesty.
McGinniss, who works for online publication the Daily Caller, was among the group of people who drove Joseph Rosenbaum to hospital when he was shot by Rittenhouse during a night of violent protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin on August 25, 2020.
Speaking from the witness stand on Thursday, McGinniss gave his account of that night's events, telling the jury that he was standing several feet away from the scene, and that his eyes were "fixing at the barrel of the weapon" in Rittenhouse's hands at all times as the incident unravelled.
McGinniss claimed he feared that "something with the weapon was about to happen" when he saw Rosenbaum "running and eventually lunging towards the front portion of the rifle."
Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger repeatedly grilled McGinniss as to the exact position of Rosenbaum at the moment of the shooting, asking him if Rittenhouse fired as the latter was "falling." McGinniss disagreed with this interpretation, saying: "No, not falling, lunging," doubling down on his testimony.It was as if, you know, if you were to lunge at somebody, if anybody were to lunge, they would probably stop themselves, you know, from falling face down on the ground, but the shots were fired in the exact instant that his momentum was going forward and that continued until Mr. Rosenbaum landed on the groundMcGinniss' testimony supports the argument made by Rittenhouse's lawyers that the teen, then 17, was acting in self-defense when he shot and killed Rosenbaum. The prosecution has argued that Rosenbaum was unarmed, and therefore was not capable of harming Rittenhouse.
Rittenhouse has been charged with homicide and reckless endangerment for shooting and killing 36-year-old Rosenbaum and 26-year-old Anthony Huber, as well as injuring 23-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz. His much-anticipated trial kicked off earlier this week, and has already been mired in controversy. Liberal commentators have been up in arms over the composition of the jury, which reportedly features only one non-white member. On Thursday, one of the jurors was dismissed over a joke he told a sheriff's deputy about Jacob Blake's police shooting. Blake, a black man, was left paralyzed from the torso down after he was shot by police seven times on August 23, 2020. His shooting sparked the protests in Kenosha, but was later ruled justified.
Everyone here has heard me gripe about how much access to information the pigs (even your local ones) have. Some would be surprised to see that they can, without a warrant, practically instantly look up your phone bill and see who you've been chatting with. How that is done? The same data that companies buy, the pigs on the courts have ruled that the pigs can buy. Odds all of that is correct? >75%.Any SOTTites surprised about that? I'm curious.
Actually, I think most non-SOTTypes are literally unaware of even that and would be surprised by it.
Next, what about listening without a warrant? I'd put those odds at over 65% and most people STILL don't believe it. (Actually, they do do it. In a St. Pete Florida FOIA lawsuit, a state judge ordered the state pigs to hand over their cell phone listening data. (See, e.g., the Stingray, made at Harris in Melbourne Florida, which is but one type of cell phone eavesdropping tech. It fools cell towers into thinking the pigs are authorized. It used to fit in the trunk of cars they said ~2008?, but I'm sure it's now more portable than that.) They had lots of warrantless audiotapes and they fought that FOIA hard all the way. The plaintiff won and the judge ordered the defendant agencies to bring the tapes to court on X day. Instead, what happened was a federal marshal, in a supposed 'surprise' showed up and confiscated them before even the judge could hear them! That's American 'justice' and that was around 2015 or so.
George Floyd’s Nephew Posts Video Threatening Jurors in Rittenhouse TrialR.C.
George Floyd (PBUH*) has a nephew who’s been doing internet stuff.
This week, he posted a video threatening the jurors in the Kyle Rittenhouse case.
I ain’t even gonna name the people that I know that’s up in the Kenosha trial. But it’s cameras in there. It’s definitely cameras up in there. There’s definitely people taking pictures of the juries and everything like that. We know what’s going on. So we need the same results, man.** (Snip.)
Frankly, the Rittenhouse trial is going a lot better than you’d expect. I haven’t had time to sit down and watch enough of it to write about it, but I’ve read what others have said and it seems to be going well. But hey – it doesn’t matter how well your trial goes if the court allows people to threaten your jurors!
During the Derek Chauvin trial, black people were constantly posting threats against jurors, and the government didn’t do anything about it. So, apparently, this is just another aspect of the New Normal.
God bless democracy and our values because that’s who we are.** [Link]
I don't know if the prosecution has a bombshell to bring, but unless they do, there is no way this jury convicts based on the merits.