© C-Fam Org
The report published by the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were "neither upset nor happy." In fact, the report UNICEF relies on, says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.
Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. "UNICEF's report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children's health and safety," said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.
Thompson's organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.
"Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism - all of which children should not consume," continued Thompson, and "UNICEF's milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm's way."
The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people "intentionally seek out sexual content" for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images "might also represent an opportunity" to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged "seeing the nuances" which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.
UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls "vital sexuality education." It should be noted that critics charge "comprehensive sexuality education" is pornographic and harmful to children.
UNICEF's release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF's largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.
UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children's agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children's access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.
SIGN THE PETITION TO UNICEF
Reader Comments
What next? Participation?
These peado's are freaking everywhere.
R.C.
By the way, the report gives some ranges about surveys, and while supposedly 39 % of children in Spain were "happy", as the article says, only 3 percent of children in Estonia were happy. Most were supposedly neither upset or happy, but this may mean they were desensitised.
Also the report says that some children are harmed, only that the extent of harm varies. The survey is from EU Kids Online Study.
I won't say this is a pro-pornography report, I think that people criticizing it should read it first. For example, it mentions some policies by YouTube which breached privacy rights for example, and that YT was fined for it, I won't find it on the first page of many mainstream media. Also, the main reason this report was to assess ways of protecting children in the digital space, by way of age assurance and if it would work, and pornography is just a small part of it.
Now, I haven't read the EU Kids Online Study, and some quotes from it seem shady, but the discussed UNICEF report is not about that one, it just uses it in couple of small paragraphs as a source for some data.