Society's Child
By and large, however, I get the game: Nobody wants to be ordinary. We all dream of being special to the world, in some regard. And for minorities, a great way by which they can feel special is to seek the world's pity and handouts by playing the victim card relentlessly. Great for them! Although it seems a bit beta-male-ish to me, the desire to be pitied as a way to be special; but, hey, whatever works. The trouble is: It has worked all too well! We see this strategy, made popular by whiny blacks, now adopted by people who pretend to be unique genders and whatever else they can pull out of their hats to be pitied as part of their special life-perks packages. And not only has it spread out to other special victim cults, but full-grown adults in America, supposedly educated, have bought into this nonsense and pity the poor self-victimized bastards to the point they're editing curricula to reflect the populous stance that all white people benefit from privilege, all nonwhite people suffer under oppression.
Sorry for the long and winding preamble here; I'll get to my point now. A good friend of mine, fantastic writer, and under-appreciated educator, Tiana Dalichov, recently posted some materials she's being forced to learn as part of her teacher training. Basically, the material states that it is a fact of life that all white people benefit from privilege, and racism is rampant, and white teachers need to learn how to treat nonwhites differently in order to treat them equally.
No. I'm not making this up.
I'm not smart enough; I don't write well enough for such fiction. This is literally the implication of the materials, not my inference. The materials explicitly suggest that all white people are privileged and thus must learn how to navigate around their privilege when dealing with the oppressed nonwhites in education.
Instead of cursing up a storm here, which Stef and Halsey will just edit out, let me just put a finer point on it: I'm okay with addressing racism and privilege. Just prove it first!
Seriously. Prove that it exists! I won't link it here, because it's not the venue, but I have a YouTube channel and have been offering a $1,000 cash prize to anyone who can prove one single instance of white privilege in society. Just one! The criteria is simple: It has to be objective, and it has to be a case of privilege from which one benefits solely due to their skin color in this "systemic" fashion we hear so much about.
If you'd like to name your examples of supposed white privilege in the comments below, I'll be more than happy to dismantle them and embarrass you.
We can objectively show how nonwhites have numerous laws and regulations and suchlike on the books that benefit them solely for their skin tone. But we have none for white people. There is no example in this nation of a law or institution benefiting white people for white skin. Why? It's illegal! It is against the law to do such, and thus we don't find such being promoted on this mythical - sorry, call it what it is: Bullshit!-level of government, systemic, organizational, or however victims love to put it in order to make themselves seem actually oppressed.
So why, then, would it infect our system so thoroughly that it was being shoved down teachers' throats as gospel to inform their teaching behaviors and decisions? One may disagree here, and this is decidedly only my opinion, but I believe it's simply white guilt at work. The people who set these rules and parameters are privileged! Not because they're white, but likely because they were born into good homes, with hard-working parents, they went to school and studied hard, and they made a career for themselves. But they have been so comfortable for so long that they see a kid with a $700 phone tweeting that he's oppressed by the system, and they buy into it. They think, "He's right! I'm white, and I have all this! He's black, and he doesn't! Therefore the system must be unfair! If it were fair, he'd have everything I have! So we need to address this privilege!"
It's an ironic level of empathy which causes one's faculties to reason properly to crash asunder and give way to the dreaded soft bigotry of low expectations. In other words, the white middle-class people in charge of creating these rules have started to view nonwhites in America as people who cannot achieve success, unless white people are willing to do more for them to assist them. Unless white people are willing to be the saviors, how will nonwhites ever be saved!?
One could see this being an issue among the exceedingly altruistic or the dreamers of the world who view middle-class whining black kids as bigger victims than those African black kids you adopt for the price of a cup of coffee every day. Sure. Everybody's an animal lover once the ASPCA shows those pictures of precious pound puppies and asks for donations. It's understandable. But we're talking about educators here. We're talking about people who, at least at one time in their lives, wanted to make a difference in the world by teaching people to think critically and to think for themselves. This has given way to simply allowing spoiled babies to emotionally blackmail them for special favor, and it's hurting mightily the Tianas of the world who are thus forced to study and use these unproven standards to teach.
Harmful standards, by any measure. Any reasonable measure.
And what, exactly, are we teaching? Look, I'm not Robert Einstein over here. Normal, average dude of over-inflated intellect boast and an inbuilt spellchecker to make it seem like I write well. But even I know that you can't "other" people to provide balm to people who claim that they're "othered!" It's illogical to the point of severe mental retardation. Just follow it through. So some whiny black people feel oppressed and feel that everyone's racist toward them. They whine and lash out about it, while wearing their brand new Air Jordans and using the new iPhone. Fine. It is what it is. Whiners gonna whine! But then the guilt-riddled white folks in power have some sort of Dr.-House-with-autism epiphany and think, "Oi, if only we taught black kids differently than white kids, admitting our privilege and navigating around it to treat blacks like special victims, we would finally have equality!"
No, you dorks! You're "othering' these people-who do tend to want to be "othered," to be sure - in the name of equality and inclusiveness.
You had one job, dumb-ass, and you're doing it wrong!
You teach equally to promote equality. You don't show that this group is black kids, this group is white kids, this group is Hispanic kids. That's separating people based on race, which gives some people fodder to simply believe that these are communists in education trying to promote their warfare to collapse capitalism! I'm not completely given over to that thought; I happen to believe white liberals are just intellectually vapid and have less spine than a jellyfish. They're just doing it wrong, believing that they must do it like this because they, the noble whites, have to save nonwhites, the dumber, can't-do-for-themselves minorities.
These teachers are literally instituting in-class segregation, based on no other factor than the color of someone's skin. And they believe that this will work to heal racial tensions and to halt racism?
If I facepalmed any harder I wouldn't be able to complete this article. Let me just wrap it up by reiterating my point from earlier: If there's white privilege out there benefiting whites and oppressing blacks, prove it!
Who would have ever thought that this would be an unreasonable standard? The status quo, the popular take, is to simply say, "Yes, nonwhites are oppressed and whites benefit because reasons... which will never name." It's actually become revolutionary to suggest evidence of a claim.
And that, my friends, does nothing but make social justice a religion which needs to be dragged into the realm of logic and reason. Kicking and screaming!
If there's white privilege, just prove it first before you teach it.
Reader Comments
Look, I'm not Robert Einstein over here.
Holy moly... was Albert Einstein, Robert Einstein? I had no idea!!! Is that true?
Re. the subject matter, well from the top of my head, I can think of this story
People outraged after Oxford medical student who stabbed Tinder date walks free
An Oxford graduate who stabbed her Tinder date - but avoided jail - caused outrage again when campaigners compared the sentences handed down to working class men in similar cases. Lavinia Woodward...But you can argue it had nothing to do with her being white, more just her being Rich and Intelligent I suppose. Plus it wasn't in the states. Ah, wasn't there a story a couple of years back of a black professor who got arrested getting into his own house? Didn't he like try and tell the cop it was his own house or something? Think Obama invited him and the cop over to the Whitehouse for a beer. Hmm... can't recall a similar story of a white professor facing the same situation. Memory fails.
Erhm, another 'top of the head' thought, length of prison sentences in America for supposedly minor crimes... I think this can show a certain degree of racial disparity though I suppose you can argue it's cause blacks are criminals by nature and therefore the longer they are put away for, the better. So I guess that's a non-starter as an argument.
What about stereotypes kids face at school as a result of bullying? Like when someone gets bullied, what tools do you think the bullies use? If a kid is fat, the bully will use that to terrorise them, if the kid is autistic, that will be used... if the kid is black, guess what can and will be used? And bullying is like rampant in schools... Just go to youtube and see all the videos these kids upload. But that's not privilege I guess, it's just bullying.
Institutional racism... is that a thing? I'm pretty sure I heard of that term somewhere before? Must have been from a Hillary supporter. Guess that's that for that argument.
So in short, I suppose all is well.
So multiple studies have shown that the more priviledged one becomes e.g. rich, the less empathetic they become, the less they are able to connect or relate with the plight of those less fortunate or poorer etc... they start to exhibit certain characteristics that could be easily summarised as 'being jerks' (non-scientific term obviously). These studies have demonstrated this on an individual basis and you can find youtube talks about them.
Here for example is one
[Link]
So anyways, that's a thing... like scientifically. You can find multiple other studies.
So we take this to groups of people... you might say, well... that only applies to individuals but well well well... first of all, it applies to the vast majority of 'rich' people which we can class as a group. But wait... what about racial groups, or nations? Hmm... I'm not going to point to the US as a lot of people here are American and might get triggered. So I'll point to an article sott posted yesterday
Here's what candid Israelis said to Abby Martin about Palestinians
"Not one Palestine said they wanted Jewish Israelis exterminated, they just wanted equity," Abby Martin told teleSUR. Award-winning journalist Abby Martin has revealed the impact of...It seems to me that by virtue of their position, a good chunk of normal jewish israelites can't connect to the plight of Palestinians.. in fact they say they have an arab problem, which they should solve... where have we heard that before? Have we not heard a bunch of americans say they have problems with black people which they should solve?...
But wait, you might contend that... Here's another article, read the comment from the user Garriko
What the data actually says about police violence against black men - and why the media narrative is dangerous
A few days ago, former police officer Jason Stockley, who is white, was acquitted of first-degree murder; he had fatally shot Anthony Lamar Smith, who was black, in 2011. Protests started in St....Going back to the Jewish Israeli thing, you can say that perhaps that a good number think they have a problem is because perhaps a lot of the suicide bombings and attacks they experience are from palestinians... I mean, that's like a fact. No? So maybe they are justified in their views? the more I look into this, the more parallels I see except israel is like America in the 50s... but still, you can get the picture. You will contend it of course because you don't want to admit that you're no better than a jewish israelite in their view of the 'other' plus you'll say the situation is not as bad or as explicit (open air prisons and whatnot)... what you fail to see is that the same mental mechanisms are in play...
The point is, the author of this article by virtue of his position is rendered blind and is no different than a normal jewish israelite getting interviewed by Abby Martin
Nice race-bait article asshole! Our bodies are vehicles for the soul. We're all oppressed!
It has now morphed into the creation of race based rules and policies, because creating race based laws would be illegal.
But race based rules and policies are just as much an affront to whites as segregation and race based laws were to blacks.
One cant help but think that those in power wish to fracture society into warring factions.
But is this really asking anything - or a provocation designed to inflame division?
A 'psyop' or deceit by which to seem reasonable while undermining the operation of Reason.
Is SOTT a conduit through which deceit sows itself to the unwary?
Is there any form of identity that is not a conduit of deception?
The nature of a true equality is not in form - but in Spirit.
The nature of inequality works by action and reaction by assertions of specialness that negate or reject or deny.
Specialness substitutes for uniqueness. Specialness is identity asserted separate from and judging over others - and therefore fearing and hating the rejected and denied self in 'others'. The 'self-abused' seed abuse as if their 'chosen specialness' is lacking - or being denied and deprived of its due recognition and support!
Identity 'politics' works division - under the aegis of deceiving manipulation - but identity in true relationship is not assertion of specialness so much as a unique appreciation and recognition of the gift of of self in other.
The segregative movement generates identity in specialness that conflicts with and defends against open connection and communication.
The integrative or re-integrative movement releases the specialness and the cost or pain of such isolation and defence to a re-cognition and re-connecting within a true resonance of being.
Only the recognition of the nature and cost of self-specialness opens the awareness of Choice. But within the choice to judge over life and other and (no less) the true of self - is choice yielded or given up to subjection under tyrannous thinking.
Terror and rage play out as power struggle in ever shifting forms - where illusion of victory gives way to a conflict management of pharmed war and sickness.
The privilege to be as one dealing out pain rather than receiving it - is a kind of delay within denial that stores up pain in hell in place of treasure in Heaven - for as you give - so shall you receive and as you give - so are you judging the measure of Life or God, one another, and self.
Once you become aware of the thinking from which you are operating - it is no longer a 'habit' of unconscious behaviour response, but a choice. If guilt (arising from specialness, rejection and denial) is no longer accepted as the true (foundation) of who you are - then you are in need of true witness.
By NOT acting from the false, is it weakened and released to make way for the true to shine itself - through you - and as your fresh perception of your world, each other, as a truly felt awareness of shared existence. It doesn't matter that the 'forgetting mind' seems to come in again, for you have found your willingness and by giving it the value of your appreciation and alignment in trust - you grow from a different sense of being than whatever the 'world' gave you - and yet honouring and purifying all that serves true within what you made (to survive in its terms).
One cannot undo or heal fears one is not yet willing to own or acknowledge - and demonizing fears keeps them hidden from an honesty of being, protects them and makes them a source of 'specialness' that seeks vengeance to vindicate its 'self'.
No one can live another's life choices, but we can align true in our own and illuminate the nature OF choice - in which others can more clearly know the nature of their choosing and change it if they recognize a poor outcome calls for a better choice - by which I mean more consciously relational - and not more 'correct' according to the judgements of others or the world.
Check out this 2 stops... one of a biker doing a wheelie on the main road (illegal) and getting stopped - walking away problem free. Guy was a white student - see the interaction between him and the cop
[Link]
Compare to this of a black riding his bike, minding his business before what I can only describe as a mini-swat team descending on him...
Compare the 2 and then argue all is well
[Link]
[Link]
I actually remember seeing some of the studies the guy talks about where the name was the only difference in the resumes... the data spoke for itself.
Yup, starting to this the author is talking BS.
1. what is objective (in itself a subjective decision)
2. what constitutes proof etc
so its not like a rigged contest or anything, it's not like you'll be blinded by your own bias or anything.
Seriously, dude, stop lashing out and seek some education.
Maybe start with reading Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison.
Too bad you can't go around in blackface for a few days, see what it feels like...you know, walk through a rich white neighborhood in broad daylight so the cops come and arrest you...