They never had any data from most of the southern hemisphere.
And they made up much of their southern hemisphere ocean data.
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009The US has NOAA's best data, and almost half it is also fake.
from: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <thomas.crowley@ed.ac.uk>
Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where
we didn't have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.
Cheers
Phil
di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt
This date in 1934 may have been the hottest in US history. The map below shows actual temperatures, not the "heat index." Almost two-thirds of the US was over 100F on July 21, 1934 - with temperatures of 115 in Missouri and South Dakota, and 113 in Minnesota.
The US has much less hot weather than it used to.
No serious scientist would make claims based on fake data, which is why NOAA does it. Their climate people are propagandists, not scientists.
Comment: Indeed, the world seems to be going through a global cooling pattern, not global warming as the paid shill scientists at the NOAA would have you believe. Take this priceless story as a great example: Dรฉjร vu: Global warming expedition stopped in its tracks by Arctic sea ice