Puppet Masters
Hillary Clinton isn't a newcomer in politics. Though she has a reputation of a successful politician but it's difficult to mention her merits. All of them (if any) are easily cancelled out by her scandalous failures.
Hillary often acted thoughtlessly, irresponsibly, hypocritically and falsely. There's no need to mention the scandal with her personal email account instead of an official government account. But some of her mistakes and wrong decisions led to fatal consequences.
There is no doubt that as Secretary of State she played a crucial role in the decision by the US to intervene in LIbya on the side of the jihadi mercenaries who were bought and paid for by the USA. But there was nothing behind that decision but Hillary's mad desire to topple a dictator as her husband Bill Clinton had done in former Yugoslavia and George Bush in Iraq.
There was no strategy. As a result Libya is torn apart, ruled by warlords reliant on terror and torture, and the thousands of Libyans and other Africans who previously would have found safe haven in Libya are now force to flee to Europe across the Mediterranean and risk a watery grave.
On Hillary's watch, 'security failings' also led to the murder of United States ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans in the US consulate in Benghazi on 11 September 2012. As is known, Hillary Clinton was aware of 'security problems' but did nothing.
Hillary's campaign for presidency is accompanied by scandals revealing her mendacity and hypocrisy. During a George Washington University campaign event in 2008 Clinton said that, on a 1996 trip to Bosnia, she came under sniper fire and was forced to run for cover. "There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base," she said.
Clinton's claim was found to be false. Her story was ridiculed by ABC News as "like a scene from Saving Private Ryan". When caught lying she vainly tried to find a silly excuse. There's no way to rebuild people's trust when you're an inveterate liar.
Hillary doesn't seem to learn any lessons from her mistakes. In January 2016, during her new presidential campaign, she accused her opponent Bernie Sanders of supporting the National Rifle Association and voting with the gun lobby.
"I have made it clear based on Senator Sanders' own record that he has voted with the NRA, with the gun lobby numerous times," Clinton said. But Hillary was far from honest because her own largest donors — and some of the largest contributors to the Clinton Foundation — are connected directly or indirectly with the defense industry and the gun lobby.
Indeed, Hillary Clinton tops the list of presidential hopefuls receiving defense lobby contributions — outpacing even the top Republican candidates. On March 21, according to The Intercept, a fundraising rally for Clinton's campaign will be hosted in part by Jeff Forbes of the lobbying firm Forbes-Tate, who had lobbied for the National Rifle Association until 2016.
More than that, she cooperates with many financial corporations. According to Bloomberg, Hillary was paid $12 million in the 16 months after leaving her role as US secretary of state. Knowing she'd likely run for president, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley (and other big Wall Street corporations) gladly paid her $2.9 million in speaking fees alone.
There's no doubt that, in her run for the Presidency, Hillary has decided to put aside all moral values (not that she had any to begin with). There's just one principle she holds dear: the end justifies the means, no matter how psychopathic those means are.
Reader Comments
Well, if the establishment in the repub party are successful in stopping the Donald and brokering a convention that puts forth another useful idiot guaranteed to lose to the Hillarious One with that sickly smile, thinking they win either way, then it seems the void brings out Jesse Ventura and Cynthia McKinney to oppose them, right? Isn't that the plan?
HFL, 'The Donald' has become, in US MSM parlance to be one and the same as Trump.
Since I believe you live in the UK, I expect that YOUR MSM hasn't caught up yet. 'Fear not: They will.'
Then they will say how Trump is ridiculed by the name "The Donald" {a name that THEY - OUR MSM has, for years, trumpeted- NO pun intended!) They will then compare that with Hitler's "THE Fuhrer." If you'd heard it over here, (this side of the pond), you'd know it now.
After all, SOTT (God bless it) is still a group that feels that government is not, by its very nature, evil. [I.e., and E.g., don't expect them to quote Supreme Ct. Justice, Holmes, I believe, when he said, "The power to tax is the power to destroy."]
But I bet you know what I mean.
R.C.
IF the Anti-Christ story is true. .
(I.e., if the Revelation of St. John, the Divine, a/k/a, the last chapter of both "The Holy Bible" AND "The New Testament"*)
Then, wouldn't the ANTI-Christ be as opposite as possible?
Let's compare: (We shall not get below zero as things would get infinite quickly for 'Killary.'
Christ Killary . . . . Score
Male 0 Female 0
Anti-Violence even unto the pharisees; Kill 'em all! Let God sort 'em out. (Pope Innocent?)
Admission of faults Claims faultlessness!
Sexuality Lack or opposite. (
Hetero
STO OR STS?
STO STS
Who would trust to be less likely to cut off your genital area?
Jesus wins: hands down!
Not even a close call! No need for some rule re 'tie goes to the runner', etc.
SO LET'S ALL VOTE: HILLARY FOR ANTI CHRIST?
R.C.
*As arbitrarily/ conspiratorily determined at the Council of Nicaea.
RC
"Since I believe you live in the UK, I expect that YOUR MSM hasn't caught up yet. 'Fear not: They will."
Yeah, they have actually. We probably get almost as much Trump as you do in this strange world called "anglophone'.
Whenever I hear someone hedging around, using the phrase "The Donald", I always get the vibe that the pundit in question has a hard on for the high school psycho who's dad owns a sweet shop (U.S. 'candy store') but can't-quite-unequivocally express his love and longing to the world for fear of chastisement by his more sensible and less pliable peers.
Is there a description or definition of "The American Dream"? Is it a moveable standard or does it have a fixed identity? Does anyone believe it is an achievable reality?
Republican and Democrat nominees all want to "make America great again", but what does that mean? How do they plan to achieve that? Was America ever great?
Questions, questions, questions.... does anyone out there know the answers?






[Link]