© Unknown
He found a four month old bull calf dead in the field. Gillis noticed that the calf had damage to one of its eyes. Then, he noticed something very unusual. A patch of hide approximately five inches across in a perfect circle was missing from the calf.
The circle of hide had been removed with surgical precision, so much so, that there wasn't even any bleeding.
Gillis had never seen anything like this in his 33 years of raising cattle. He called the Dodge County Sheriff's Department and a deputy came and investigated the incident. Gillis decided to look on the internet and see if there were and more type incidents like this that had happened anywhere else. He found where cows had been mutilated in several other states out west and also on a farm in Hall County Georgia in 2009.
There, an almost exact incident that happened with one of their bull calves. They also had another cow mutilates just two weeks before.
Cattle mutilation is a phenomenon that has been reported across the country at least since the 1960s. It even has its own name: "bovine excision."
Despite in-depth government investigations worthy of the 1990s TV show X-Files, there has never been a clear explanation. While theories have ranged from bizarre blood-drinking cults to extraterrestrials, some believe the mutilations are actually done by small animals or insects who eat away parts of the body but leave most intact.
For now, the sheriff's department and Gillis are keeping an open mind and just hoping to find out exactly how the death and mutilation of the calf occurred.
Gillis is also offering a $1,000.00 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible. The Gillis farm is located on the Hawkinsville Highway.
If anyone has any information about the incident, they are asked to call 478-231-8236 or the Dodge County Sheriff's office at 478-374-8131.
Who, pray tell, are these "Some?"
"SOME believe the mutilations are actually done by small animals or insects who eat away parts of the body but leave most intact."
HAR HAR! Oh, they AREN'T joking?
This does not fit with any of the thousands of cases of "perfect circular incisions" without bleeding, and usually - though the article makes no mention one way or another - completely exanguinated bodies with no disturbed ground around it. Any takers on a bet that the unmentioned cored/taken portion was from the anus or the genitalia? (That's the standard finding, although you won't find it in this pathetic piece of selective editing of facts which goes out of its way to omit most every relevant and material parts of the basic who, what, where, when, how and why.) Of course, one shouldn't expect such responsible reporting from an article that cites to such "somes" as if there really is a person who would put their name on THAT theory!
That painfully obvious selective editing is designed to ensure that your average MSM-Programmed American Idiot will resort to one of the many standard human (but more prevalent in idiots) psychological self-deception activities, (e.g., subconscious and conscious minds agree, "Well it's just unpleasant to think about, so we won't.")
R.C.