It seems that folks are all "wild about Harry" over at Climate Audit, with the revelations occurring there, and no good kerfluffle would be complete without some pictures of the weather stations in question. It seems a weather station used in the Steig Antarctic study , aka "Harry", got buried under snow and also got confused with another station, Gill, in the dataset. As Steve McIntyre writes:
Gill is located on the Ross Ice Shelf at 79.92S 178.59W 25M and is completely unrelated to Harry. The 2005 inspection report observes:
2 February 2005 - Site visited. Site was difficult to locate by air; was finally found by scanning the horizon with binoculars. Station moved 3.8 nautical miles from the previous GPS position. The lower delta temperature sensor was buried .63 meters in the snow. The boom sensor was raised to 3.84 m above the surface from 1.57 m above the surface. Station was found in good working condition.
I didn't see any discussion in Steig et al on allowing for the effect of burying sensors in the snow on data homogeneity.

The difference between "old" Harry and "new" Harry can now be explained. "Old" Harry was actually "Gill", but, at least, even if mis-identified, it was only one series. "New" Harry is a splice of Harry into Gill - when Harry met Gill, the two became one, as it were.

Considered by itself, Gill has a slightly negative trend from 1987 to 2002. The big trend in "New Harry" arises entirely from the impact of splicing the two data sets together. It's a mess.
So not only is there a splice error, but the data itself may have been biased by snow burial.

Why is the snow burying important? Well, as anyone skilled in cold weather survival can tell you, snow makes an excellent insulator and an excellent reflector. Snow's trapped air insulative properties is why building a snow cave to survive in is a good idea. So is it any wonder then that a snowdrift buried temperature sensor, or a temperature sensor being lowered to near the surface by rising snow, would not read the temperature of the free near surface atmosphere accurately?

As I've always said, getting accurate weather station data is all about siting and how the sensors are affected by microclimate issues. Pictures help tell the story.

Here's "Harry" prior to being dug out in 2006 and after:
Antarctica Harry AWS, 2006
Harry AWS, 2006 - Almost completely buried upon arrival to service the automated weather station.

Antarctica Harry AWS, 2006
Harry AWS, 2006 - After digging out the automated weather station.

You can see "Harry's Facebook Page" here at the University of Wisconsin.

It seems digging out weather stations is a regular pastime in Antarctica, so data issues with snow burial of AWS sensors may be more than just about "Harry". It seems Theresa (Harry's nearby sister) and Halley VI also have been dug out and the process documented. With this being such a regular occurrence, and easily found within a few minutes of Googling by me, you'd think somebody with Steig et al or the Nature peer reviewers would have looked into this and the effect on the data that Steve McIntyre has so eloquently pointed out.

Here's more on the snow burial issue from Antarctic bloggers:

The map showing Automated Weather Stations in
Antarctica:
Antarctica Map of Automated Weather Stations
© unknown

The Gill AWS in question.
Gill AWS in Antarctica
© unknownGill AWS in Antarctica
From Polartrec

Theresa was placed at this location partly to study the air flow in the region. Looking out the window of the plane we can definitely see the air flowing!!! Jim estimates the wind at about 25 miles per hour.
Wind blown snow at Theresa AWS
© unknownWind blown snow at Theresa AWS in Antarctica.

With the temperature around 0 degrees Fahrenheit the wind chill was about 20 below, it is obvious this is going to be quite a chore.
Theresa AWS
© unknownStarting to dig out Theresa AWS in Antarctica.

The weather station has not been working, so George needs to figure out what is wrong with it and then fix it. The station is almost buried in the snow so we will also need to remove all of the electronics, add a tower section and then raise and bolt all of the electronics and sensors back in place.
Theresa AWS
© unknownGeorge unhooking cables under the buried Theresa AWS.

After refueling the plane, with the fuel in the 55 gallon drums, Jim and Louie helped dig down to the electronics boxes that were completely buried plus they built us a wind break that made huge difference in helping us not be so cold. After about 4 hours we are almost through. As I am hanging onto the top of the raised tower in the wind, one bunny boot wedged onto the tower bracing, the other boot wrapped around the tower, one elbow gripping the tower, my chin trying to hold the wind sensor in place and both bare numb hands trying to thread a nut onto the spinning wind sensor I really appreciate the difficulty of what is normally Jonathan's job. After checking to make sure Theresa is transmitting weather data we board the plane and head to Briana our second station.
Theresa AWS
© unknownTheresa AWS after being dug out. Notice the difference between this and the first picture.
From Antarctic Diary

More movement

It's been another flat-out week. The vehicle team have dug up and moved the Drewery building, which was getting do buried snow was almost up the windows. Team Met have been on the move too - all the remaining instruments are now bolted securely to the Laws roof, so we headed up the the Halley VI building site to relocate the weather station.
Antarctica AWS
© unknownJules starts digging out the weather station

Only 15km away, the Halley VI site looks a lot like Halley V. It's flat, white and snowy. Very snowy. The weather station had about 1.5m built up around it!
Antarctica AWS
© unknownJules and Simon recovering the solar panel

Antarctica AWS
© unknownIn the hole!

The weather station was a survey reference point for the build project so we had to find a suitable replacement. Could this be Antarctica's first pole-dancing venue?
Antarctica AWS
© unknownPenguin Party memories…

After an hour or so sweating it our with shovels, the weather station popped out and was loaded onto the sledge. Like the reference point, the station's new location had to be precise as vehicles are banned from the upwind section of the site to keep that area ultra-clean for future snow-chemistry experiments.
Antarctica AWS
© unknownWeather station on the move

Driving on a compass bearing and GPS track, we found the new site just under a kilometre away.
Antarctica AWS
© unknownThe final setup
I dig weather stations

My main task for today was to get a start on raising my weather station. I'd installed it 2 years ago, and with the high accumulation at Summit, it's getting buried. The electronics are all in a box under the snow, and the only things visible at the surface were the anemometer for measuring wind speed and direction, the thermistor for measuring air temperature, and the solar panel to keep the batteries charged.
Antarctica AWS
© unknownThe buried weather station. The green is the solar panel, which was about 1.5 meters off the surface when I installed the station.

Antarctica AWS
© unknownAt the bottom of the pit with the datalogger electronics.

In the morning I downloaded all the data from the station, and checked to see that it was all in order. Then it was time for digging. I'd carefully made a diagram when I inastalled the station, so I knew exactly where to dig. A couple of hours later I'd found my box!

I brought everything up to the surface, and then was about to fill in the pit, when I realized at least one more scientist at Summit might want to make measurements in it; the pit's already dug! So tomorrow I'll help Lora with some conductivity measurements, then fill in the pit, re-bury the box just beneath the surface, and it'll be ready to go for another 2 years!

And there's more....

The Australians seem to have AWS problems as well. From the Australian Antarctic Division:

On Monday two groups headed out, with Largy and Denis going up to the skiway to check on the condition of the equipment stored there for the winter and beginning preparations for the coming summer flying season.

Bill, Brian and Ian went up to the Lanyon Junction Automatic Weather Station (AWS) to check its condition and retrieve some of the sensors in preparation for the annual servicing of the various remote units.
Antarctica AWS
© Ian P.A hard life for an AWS – Buried 1.5 metres

Antarctica AWS
© Ian P.This used to be an anemometer
And the University of Maine, participating in USITASE, has the same troubles, they write:

We reached our first major destination at the end of today's travel, the site of the Nico weather station. There are several automatic weather stations spread out over the surface of Antarctica. These stations measure things like temperature, wind speed and wind direction and then relay this data back to scientists via satellite. Anything left on the surface of the snow will eventually be drifted in and buried by blowing snow. This particular weather station (NICO) has not been seen in several years. They tried to locate it via airplane a few years ago and were unsuccessful. Our task was to find the weather station, record its position with GPS, and mark the location with flags so that in the near future, the weather station can be raised and serviced.

We arrived at the coordinates of the station around 10 pm. Our initial scans of the horizon were not productive, so Matthew and John took the lead tractor (with our crevasse-detecting radar) out to survey a grid near our stopping point. The radar should detect a large metal object like a weather station, but the survey was also unsuccessful. After a fine pasta and tomato sauce dinner, John went outside for an evening constitutional. He saw a shiny object out in the distance - further inspection with a pair of binoculars determined that it was the top of the NICO weather station! Several of us marched out to the station, which was actually about a half mile distant, marked the location with bright orange flags and recorded the position via GPS for future reference. Only the top foot or two of the station was still visible. John was in exactly the right place at the right time to see a reflection from this object while we were near the kitchen module, and so allowed us to complete our first task successfully.

Tomorrow, we drive on.
Antarctica AWS
© unknown

Antarctica AWS
© unknown
This regular burial and digging out of stations brings the whole network of AWS stations to be used as sensitive climate measurement stations into question.