Health & Wellness
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
Yet, for some easily identified reasons, they must be feeling insecure, as this essay suggests, because they are aggressively attacking the opposition to their well laid out plans.
A Yahoo News article begins with, "The spread of very often absurd vaccine misinformation on social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter is not what the world needs as it prepares to inoculate itself for COVID-19." This is not a factual statement. The world is not preparing, not as they are implying. Millions are more afraid of the vaccine than the virus, which is not much of a threat when properly treated. However, politicians and health officials are foaming at the mouth for a rapid vaccine rollout.
Comment: See also:
- Texas hospital botches vaccine PR stunt as nurse jabbed with EMPTY SYRINGE, but liberals say pointing it out is 'anti-vax'
- Coronavirus vaccine: why it's important to know what's in the placebo
- Majority of Austrians REJECT Covid-19 vaccines and mass testing program
- Pfizer to assess report about 'potential serious allergic reaction' to Covid-19 vaccine after Alaska health worker is hospitalized
- In latest 'conspiracy' crackdown, Twitter to scrub posts claiming vaccines 'cause harm' or are 'used to control populations'
- Ireland considers coronavirus vaccine IDs, those without will suffer restrictions
- Pelosi warns lawmakers they'll be barred from speaking on House floor without a mask
- MSNBC's Dr. Gupta: 'Just because you get vaccinated doesn't mean you should be traveling or that you're liberated from masks'
A new meta-analysis study reveals that exposure to radiation from wireless devices such as cell phones, iPads and laptops significantly increases the risk of breast cancer.
The meta-analysis study (a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies) examined eight studies that were published between 1996-2015. The highest risk was found in women over 50.
Comment: See also:
- Russian government recommended banning Wi-Fi and cell phones in primary schools
- Dozens of parrots found dead on mobile phone mast in the Philippines
- Verizon warns shareholders AGAIN about personal injury and death lawsuits from wireless radiation health effects
- Woman who used laptop on lap gets tumor in leg - coincidence or toxic electromagnetic radiation?
- Class-action lawsuit claims Apple and Samsung phones exceed FCC radiation limits
- 'Radiation scandal': Class action lawsuit filed against Samsung, Galaxy, Apple iPhone
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?
The "gold standard" Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides - tiny fragments of DNA or RNA - and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the "cycle threshold" or "CT value". The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.
This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.
In some COVID-19 vaccine trials, participants in the control group (the group receiving a placebo) are injected with a saline solution. In other trials, they receive an actual treatment. For example, in the COVID-19 vaccine developed by the University of Oxford, the control group receives a meningitis and septicaemia vaccine as a placebo.
The benefit of using an actual vaccine as the placebo control is that it will cause a similar reaction at the site of the injection as the COVID-19 vaccine, such as muscle pain and soreness. This prevents patients from knowing whether they are getting the placebo or the real treatment. The scientific term for hiding knowledge of who got what treatment is "blinding".
If patients know they are getting the real thing, they may expect to get better, and their expectations can make them get better a bit faster. And if they know they are getting the placebo, they could drop out of the trial because they know they aren't getting the actual treatment. Adding an actual vaccine to the placebo control helps the trial remain blinded and so prevents bias arising from differing expectations.
The new research, published in Cell, reveals the cells that mediate the crosstalk between the nervous and immune systems. It also paves the way for more research on how the nervous system regulates immune responses, for example, during an infection.
Comment: See also:
- The vagus nerve and how it impacts health, mood and performance
- Newly discovered organ that senses pain may be lurking under your skin
- How viruses and bacteria balance each other in the gut microbiome
- New gut-brain link: How gut mucus could help treat brain disorders
- Tomato plants send electrical signals to each other through fungi
- Objective:Health #25 - Fascia - The Body's "Fiber Optic" Crystalline Matrix
- The Truth Perspective: Are Cells the Intelligent Designers? Why Creationists and Darwinists Are Both Wrong
The afflicted individual remains in the hospital on Wednesday after suffering a powerful reaction Tuesday, three sources who had seen official reports of the victim's health told the New York Times. The workplace or residence of the health worker have not been disclosed, nor have any more details about their health status been released, and it's not clear if they had other, non-medical allergies, one of the sources explained.
Pfizer is "working with local health authorities" to assess the details of the report about a "potential serious allergic reaction," the company told RT in a statement on Wednesday, pledging to "closely monitor all reports suggestive of serious allergic reactions following vaccination" and "update labeling language if needed."
Comment: Vaccines typically take years for development and testing. Covid-19 vaccines were instantly produced and approved for use in a few months without proper testing. Some of them are developed with a new mRNA gene-edited vaccine technology that is entirely experimental and never before approved for use as a vaccine. The large-scale use of these vaccines in healthy human subjects is unprecedented and long-term effects unknown.
- Supreme Court rejects vaccine lawsuit
- Sputnik V, world's first Covid-19 vaccine, launched - Putin's daughter among first to take it - Vaccine will NOT be mandatory in Russia
- 'No Covid-19 vaccine, no normal life' - UK minister
- Chicago minority communities skeptical about COVID-19 vaccine
- EU criticizes UK's emergency authorization of COVID-19 vaccine
- Operation Warp Speed: U.S. Troops will be among the first to get COVID-19 vaccine
- Engdahl: The warp speed push for coronavirus vaccines
- Here's why you should skip the COVID vaccine
- How COVID-19 vaccine can destroy your immune system
Paul Offit smiled and played the card while peddling his book on the comedy central channel as Steven Colbert jokingly said, "if the vaccines work so good for you, why do I need one?" Dr. Mark Segal pulled it on Fox News as Mary Holland, JD eloquently described the issue of vaccine injury and loss of legal recourse in an era of forced and mandated vaccines. In addition to flaunting several false allegations and sound bites, Dr. Segal's well-rehearsed rant brushed right over the issue at hand, the fact that victims of vaccine injury have no legal right to sue - and instead launched into his agenda of scaring the listeners by parroting the "herd immunity" dogma.
The hype about herd immunity unfortunately creates a wall of hostility between those who vaccinate and those who delay some vaccines, avoid certain vaccines, or quit vaccinating altogether.
Recently I shared a video interview in which British journalist Anna Brees spoke with Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., who is a past vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis.
Yeadon has over 25 years of experience working in the pharmaceutical industry and has consulted with over 20 biotechnology companies.1 In the interview, he talks about his concerns that widespread PCR testing is creating the false idea the pandemic is resurging, as the total mortality rate is completely normal. He also discusses his concerns with COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Comment: See also:
- Anthony Fauci: 40 years of lies from AZT to remdesivir
- In control of response panel, Remdesivir maker Gilead is behind the war on Hydroxychloroquine, will make billions
- STUNNING: Fauci's remdesivir costs $9 per dose, will be sold at $3,000 per treatment — China company linked to Soros will also mass produce the drug
- Gilead's coronavirus treatment remdesivir to cost $3,120 per U.S. patient with private insurance
In fact, the Serum Institute of India has gone so far as to sue one of their vaccine trial participants for defamation after he had the audacity to claim the vaccine gave him serious side effects. What nerve! Hopefully being sued for $13.5 million will put him in his place and let everyone else know that suffering side effects from the Covid vaccine is summarily forbidden.
Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we cover the latest news around the imminent Covid vaccines. Failure is not an option.
YouTube sucks, so check us out on Brighteon and lbry.tv!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.
Running Time: 00:36:44
Download: MP3 — 33.7 MB
Comment: See also: