Health & Wellness
I suppose most people believe the trials on vaccines for COVID19 will be looking to demonstrate that they reduce the risk of infection, death, or serious illness - or suchlike.
Also, you may have heard that several vaccines could be ready for use early next year 2021. Maybe even later this year.
As Dilbert may retort: Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Oh, let me pause and wipe away my tears of mirth.
Really. Think about it. Then think a bit more...
AstraZeneca (AZ) is thought to be leading the pack with their vaccine AZD1222. Their major clinical trial will recruit 30,000 participants - which is good. You can find the trial description on Clinicaltrials.gov. It goes by the snappy title 'Phase III Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of AZD1222 for the Prevention of COVID-19 in Adults.' 1

According to sealed court documents, Gilead has been under investigation for illegally funneling kickbacks to health care providers in the US to boost sales.
Arms Watch has already revealed that at least 249 patients enrolled in the Gilead $3.3 billion Hepatitis C elimination project in Georgia have died, according to leaked documents. The cause of death of some patients has been reported as "unknown" in Gilead confidential reports. Other patients enrolled in the program have discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events. Some of them have died.
Is there a better model than the materialist one we're always told is true? What if the mind is non-physical and the brain an apparatus downstream in the line from consciousness to matter?
Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we explore the question: Is your mind confined to your brain?
And check us out on Brighteon and lbry.tv!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.
Running Time: 00:32:26
Download: MP3 — 29.7 MB
A study conducted in the United States in July found that when they compared 154 "case-patients," who tested positive for COVID-19, to a control group of 160 participants from the same health care facility who were symptomatic but tested negative, over 70 percent of the case-patients were contaminated with the virus and fell ill despite "always" wearing a mask.
"In the 14 days before illness onset, 71% of case-patients and 74% of control participants reported always using cloth face coverings or other mask types when in public," the report stated.
Comment: Nice to know that in the 'protection' lineup, vaccine comes in 3rd place behind 1) no mask and 2) mask. Anything short of the truth is an agenda - the obfuscation of facts to effect directed outcomes.
See also:
- What will it take for masks and face shields to end?Exercising with face masks on could be dangerous and here's why
- German Neurologist Warns Against Wearing Facemasks: 'Oxygen Deprivation Causes Permanent Neurological Damage'
The accords, struck with several law firms, signal that the world's largest maker of health care products is trying to get ahead of the burgeoning litigation, with some 20,000 lawsuits still pending, according to securities filings. They mark the first time Johnson & Johnson has settled the bulk of a plaintiffs lawyer's cases in the baby powder suits, rather than individual suits on the eve of or during trial.
The deals come seven months since J&J last faced a jury reviewing evidence about the cancer risk of its signature talc product, which it maintains is safe, although it has replaced it with a cornstarch version in the U.S. and Canada. The company used the lull, due to the pandemic, to hold settlement talks, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the matter is private.
Comment: See also:
- Johnson & Johnson to stop selling talc baby powder in U.S. and Canada
- Jury backs Johnson & Johnson in talc cancer case
- Powder Keg: FDA bowed to industry for decades as alarms were sounded over talc
- Johnson & Johnson prevails in New Jersey talc cancer trial
- Woman with cancer who used J&J talc awarded $29 million by California jury
- Asbestos in baby powder: Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay $4.7bn in talc cancer lawsuit
- Talc Producers Failed to Note Cancer Link, South Dakota Lawsuit Says
The review,1,2 published in the September 2020 issue of Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, looked at 18 studies conducted between 1982 and 2019 that examined the relationship between concentrations of copper, lead or mercury in blood, plasma, hair or nails and the prevalence of autism. While no relationship was found between autism and copper concentrations, a high degree of correlation was found for mercury and lead.
According to the authors,3 the relationship between mercury and autism is so strong that "the concentration of mercury can be listed as a pathogenic cause (disease-causing) for autism." This held true even when outlier studies that might unduly influence the results were removed.
Comment: See also:
- Success — FDA finally issues mercury amalgam warning
- Institutional Inertia: Is enough being done to protect children from Aluminum toxicity?
- Treating mercury toxicity with emeramide
- Scientists prove link between Aluminum and early onset Alzheimer's disease
- What are the similarities & differences between - Mercury & Aluminum in vaccines and lead in Flint's Water
- New Vaccine Revelation - The Neurotoxin Far Worse than Mercury..Aluminum
The brains of 186 deceased young people, including small children, from Mexico City were dissected as part of the study, which was published in Environmental Research journal.
Tiny air pollution particles were discovered in the brain stems of each of the studied individuals, with the researchers warning that they can affect molecules much like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.
The evidence of pollution was located in the substantia nigra - an area of the brain that's crucial to the progression of Parkinson's disease. The team believes that the particles, linked to Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, and which were detected in the young subjects' brains, could have made their way into the human system through the nose or gut.
Comment: Despite the science behind air pollution being the cause behind a whole host of maladies, no one in any sort of authority is treating that anywhere near as close to a problem as they did with smoking cigarettes. The reality is that the majority of ills laid at the feet of tobacco are actually the fault of pollution.
As I've discussed several times before on this blog, mortality from a specific disease is a meaningless when trying to work out if an intervention is life saving or not. The only statistic that matters is overall mortality. If an intervention decreases your risk of dying of breast cancer by 10%, but increases your risk of dying of something else by 10%, you probably wouldn't be interested in that intervention. People care about whether they are dead or alive, not about which cause of death is listed on their death certificate.
Unfortunately, a lot of scientists don't seem to understand this very basic concept, and so continue to produce meaningless studies showing that intervention x decreases the risk of dying of y, without any thought as to what the effect on overall mortality is.
When it comes to screening, there is a second problem, and that is that screening generates a lot of false positives. A false positive is when someone is told that they have a disease when in fact they don't. The problem with false positives is that they lead to follow-up interventions, which can sometimes cause physical harm and even death.
The issue of "flu shot or not" is particularly important this year because there was no influenza epidemic in the Southern Hemisphere's this year, which means that there could not have been any influenza virus collected that are always chosen 6 months earlier Down Under for the Northern Hemisphere's next vaccines.
Thus the 3 or 4 strains of influenza viruses chosen, cultured, mass-produced and marketed by Big Pharma corporations this "flu season" for the Northern Hemisphere nations are a total crapshoot and highly likely to have no benefit for potential recipients.
Comment: So it seems that the harmful effects of vaccines are even worse than even a well informed individual might suspect, if such a thing were possible.
It couldn't be said enough: getting enough rest/deep sleep, exercise, maintaining a low-carb diet, and sticking to supplements like Vitamin C and Vitamin D. among other things - are really one's best bet for boosting one's immune system naturally and fighting the flu.
And that sure beats the risk of taking toxic vaccines.
You can also hear Dr. Kyeremanteng in a provocative discussion about preventing critical illness in the Diet Doctor Podcast episode #55 with Dr. Bret Scher. MD.
While some doctors have been supporting the low-carb, ketogenic diet for years, Canadian critical care physician Dr. Kwadwo Kyeremanteng is a newcomer who's just starting to learn everything he can.
Comment: See also:
- Research suggests ketogenic diet helpful in treating asthma
- Objective:Health - Keto for Type II Diabetes: Dangerous or Miraculous?
- Richard (Bud) Veech, the unknown scientist behind the ketogenic diet, dies at 84
- Veteran Affairs tests keto diet for diabetic patients, raising ire of nay-sayers
- Relationship between Ketogenic Diet and Sleep: It's complicated
- Ketogenic diet helps tame flu virus
- The quest for the perfect ketone by the keto diet's most controversial champion
- Several reasons why a low-carb or ketogenic diet can improve your mental health
- Study finds ketone bodies boost intestinal stem cells
Comment: Add Gilead to the long list of Big Pharma companies that has a track record of doing far more harm than good: