A new scientific study by Nakahara et al. tested Covid-vaccinated people to see if they have "silent" changes in heart muscle function that standard radiology tests could detect. The study shows very unsettling results.
Scientists measured myocardial 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake. F-FDG has molecular similarity to glucose. However, 18F-FDG does not metabolise like glucose. Therefore, PET scans could detect it, and its presence shows the heart muscle's abnormally high demand for glucose, indicative of abnormal cardiac function. More about it here.
© T. Nakahara, Y. Iwabuchi, et al
Conclusions: Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities.Indeed, this is what the Nakahara study finds (emphasis added, here and below):
Results
The study included 303 nonvaccinated patients (mean age, 52.9 years; 157 females) and 700 vaccinated patients (mean age, 56.8 years; 344 females). Vaccinated patients had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaccinated patients (median SUVmax, 4.8 vs median SUVmax, 3.3 ; P < .0001). Myocardial SUVmax was higher in vaccinated patients regardless of sex (median range, 4.7-4.9 ) or patient age (median range, 4.7-5.6) compared to corresponding nonvaccinated groups (sex median range, 3.2-3.9; age median range, 3.3-3.3; P range, <.001-.015). Furthermore, increased myocardial FDG uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120, and 121-180 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 4.6-5.1) and increased ipsilateral axillary uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 1.5-2.0) compared to the nonvaccinated patients (P range, <.001-<.001).This was not supposed to happen! The Covid vaccine is not supposed to affect the heart in any way. It was promised to 'stay in the arm'.
The explosive findings of the study are discussed in the editorial that the Editor of the magazine, Dr. Bluemke, felt obliged to publish.
The development of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines is a remarkable biotech story. While traditional vaccines took 5-10 years to develop, the COVID-19 vaccines took less than a year. By comparison, the fastest conventional vaccine previously developed was the mumps vaccine, on a timescale of four years.Dr. Bluemke also does not mince words. He explains that the findings are not due to chance:
The main results: asymptomatic patients vaccinated for COVID-19 before PET had about 40% greater radiotracer activity in the myocardium than unvaccinated individuals. The P value was low, less than .0001. This translates to only one time out of 10,000 that these results would occur by chance.The editorial states that there is no rational way to ignore and explain away the negative findings of myocardial inflammation by Takahara et al.:
Vaccine manufacturers are aware of the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. These adverse effects lead to vaccine hesitancy. The study results by Nakahara et al. suggest that mild asymptomatic myocardial inflammation could be more common than we ever expected. This in turn would support a hypothesis of more severe systemic inflammation related to mRNA vaccination in some patients who present with symptoma-c myocarditis.Dr. Bluemke calls for further research into this:
The investigators understood their first result was only the starting point. They next performed extensive 'sensitivity analyses' - i.e., looking at the same data from multiple different directions. What if we account for age differences between groups, and the number of vaccinations? If mRNA vaccinations do cause asymptomatic myocardial inflammation, wouldn't the effect be more likely shortly after vaccination, rather than six months later? Many of us who had COVID-19 vaccines had flu-like symptoms immediately after vaccination - perhaps those of us with common flu-like reactions would have more myocardial inflammation as well? Could trained readers see the differences visually? Or were the differences seen only after placing regions of interest on the heart that could be accidentally mispositioned? The list goes on. Great researchers are also sceptics - they need to prove the results to themselves.Was the increase in myocardial inflammation due to a few unlucky patients driving high averages, with most people remaining unaffected?
Unfortunately, that is not the case: all quartiles were affected deleteriously, as this image shows:
© T. Nakahara, Y. Iwabuchi, et al
Is there a dose-response relationship, providing further proof of causality? Can we see if the higher-dose Moderna vaccine causes more heart problems than the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine?
Recall that studies of other topics, such as pregnancy outcomes, show a 42% greater miscarriage rate and 93% greater infant death rate for Moderna (higher dose vaccine) compared to Pfizer.
What about the Nakahara study we are discussing? It shows a weaker but similar pattern of greater response due to Moderna:
© T. Nakahara, Y. Iwabuchi, et al
Does the ill effect go away as time passes?
Unfortunately, the scientists' chart of SUVmax over time does not show complete recovery during 180 days, still above the unvaccinated level:
© T. Nakahara, Y. Iwabuchi, et al
A test of cardiac function via F-FDG uptake, a standard radiological test, is something that careful scientists conducting Covid vaccine clinical trials could carry on with a few hundred patients. Watchful vaccine safety agencies could demand such tests to be conducted to ensure the general public's safety. They chose not to do it, and their sponsors (Pfizer and Moderna) made much money selling unproven and untested Covid vaccines.
The vaccines, instead of stopping the pandemic, damaged the heart muscles of millions.
I hope that the vaccinated people will be able to ask for compensation for their damaged hearts.
The reality, sadly, is that the damage will most likely be ignored, and the vaccine billionaires will enjoy their newfound wealth while the hysterical Pfizer-sponsored press will be scaring us with new distractions.
Reader Comments
Number 1: there is no "covid", never was, and nobody has ever died as a direct result of a corona infection, PERIOD.
No time to get into the biology and repication to explain this.
Number 2: naked mRNA won't last a microsecond in the bloodstream or interstitial fluid, and they're calling it "nanolipids" but they're liposomes. My liposome controls (no nucleic acid) had a very high toxicity and a good proportion of mice died, histology revealed massive lung damage- fused cells and granulocyte infiltration and they basically drowned. There is a HUGE amount of "contaminating" DNA- plasmid and bacterial no doubt, which is far more stable and can enter cells with the liposomes. Nucleic acids are not antigens, this is not a vaccine. You will get random disease generation, and very high propbability of AUTOIMMUNE diseases, with various lag times. This is to "cover their backs" - the statistics will be complicated. Heart damage and strokes due to the fact that the lipos encounter massive pressure and high chance of heart cell damage.
2. Liposomes and lipid nanoparticles are two different types of lipid-based delivery, and while there is some overlap, they have different structures and stability.
Liposomes are a supramolecular aggregate made from amphipathic molecules (often phospholipids) that are formed in an aqueous phase. They can range from tens of nanometers to hundreds of micrometers in size.
Nano-Lipids are particles that have a solid wax or lipid core surrounded by a layer of surfactants.
In layman's terms Nano-lipids are better at fighting viruses and diseases and with the potential to overcome drug resistance.Nanolipids can't be toxic.
However, quote "While traditional vaccines took 5-10 years to develop, the COVID-19 vaccines took less than a year. By comparison, the fastest conventional vaccine previously developed was the mumps vaccine, on a timescale of four years." This is the narrative.
If you watch some of Dr. David Martin's presentations, the mRNA "medical treatment" has been in the works for the last 2 decades if not longer. The use of these genetic modification techniques were ALWAYS denied because of the potential downstream effects.
What changed? The plandemic Emergency Use Authorization allowed the CDC, NIAID, FDA, Fraudi to approve it for use in a "vaccine" but they had to change the meaning of "vaccine". They fast-tracked a bioweapon.
Bingo ! Bioweapon for $100 Alex, lol….
However, there was the recent "pesticide" spray for "West Nile virus" in NYC which could have been a test of an aerosol vax delivery. [Link]
To preserve the survivors, those determined to be deserving, action is being taken now to reduce the survivors that might compete for resources while the chaos of the aftermath continues.
Expect more 'unexplained' 'accidental' mass disimprovement events.
Demographic impacts are required by our masters.
Memes trending over the past decade will shape some of these impacts.
Avoid crowds?
What a wonderful job the nefarious ones have done in affecting so much damage to a developing population.
The " knowledge " is known and does not need to develop further, its the nefarious ones who are covering up the truth.
Clausie McSchwab presented by Time Lies
[Link]
Recently I began looking at shungite a mineral found in Karelia, Russia. It is said to block EMF radiation. So I am looking for research that may corroborate that. Shungite has fullerene carbon spheres which you can buy as a detox as synthesized C60. Here is the first research paper that indicates shungite protects. [Link]
Coconut oil.
I've also got some shungite knocking about the place too, but don't know whether that makes much diff or not.
I'd be scared of ending up as crazy as Clif High on that score.
But that's just me.
Blocks UV [Link]
Some people have had bad experiences with it.
Research before you buy.
I was probably one of the worse cases of 'elektrosensitivity' on the planet.
Couldn't be in a room that had wi-fi.
If you had a cellphone on your person, I could tell you what pocket it was in.
Symptoms lessened when I started taking coconut oil.
Symptoms completely vanished after I'd been taking iodine for about a month.
Completely cured.
There isn't really.
Not to my knowledge anyway.
Maybe no one thought about putting the research in.
When I started taking iodine, I had no idea that it would complete wipe out the 'electrosensitive' thing.
It was one of life's nice surprises.
Try Dr Brownstein's protocol.
It's all over the web.
You may also enjoy Jorge Flechas' classic lecture on the topic...[Link]
Just do the iodine thing in a non-half-arsed way.
Fantastic result.
Ivermectin belongs to a group of medications called anthelmintics. These medications treat infections caused by parasites. Just because a drug can kill a virus in a lab dish doesn’t make it a safe or effective treatment in humans.
The Argentina study has been disproven. The numbers, genders, and ages of the study’s participants were inconsistent. A hospital named in the paper as taking part in the experiments said it has no record of it happening. Health officials in the province of Buenos Aires have also said that they also have no record of the study receiving local approval.
So there is a silver lining amidst all this murder and pain.
What the sheep don't understand is math. They can't understand crippling/killing 2% of the HEALTHY participants to avoid an illness that's potentially lethal to .001% doesn't make any sense. And since they don't work at all there's actually no upside.
But that's the nuance.... We can't say they'll all die because they won't. The crater size is still massive due to the number of dumb sheep who took the stuff....
Your numbers aren't even close. If it was even found that the reported events were all true then the vaccine still would only cripple or kill .00001% that it was given too.
[Link]
.
'A trip inside the mind of a Covid jab fanatic' She's like those fabled Japanese soldiers who refused to believe World War 2 was over and wouldn't surrender by ALEX BERENSON OCT 18, 2023 [Link]
We live in time of the propaganda winning on all fronts, where people don't know left from right and up from down. And with AI, you can't trust your eyes either as videos don't prove anything anymore, or anyone's pronouncements on camera. Unless you are there yourself, you can't trust any sources. We've arrived at the technological and propagandist society even Jacques Ellul could not envision in his wildest nightmares.
'VA study published in JAMA shows that COVID *and* flu shots don't reduce your risk of hospitalization' Of course, the study was designed to show a different effect. But it "accidentally" revealed that the COVID and flu shots don't reduce your risk of hospitalization from the virus they are designed for by STEVE KIRSCH OCT 17, 2023 [Link]
Another discussion here about the non-efficacy shown in the study: [Link]
Either Steve can't read, is a dumbass, or he is cherry picking to make his false statement appear true.
What is equally informing is that there were NO excess deaths in 2020, the year of the "Covid Pandemic", while at the same time "flu deaths" disappeared.
The "vax" is a bioweapon that murders people.
Three ambulances raced by our house yesterday (pretty sparse rural area) at different times throughout the day. On the third one my son yelled "It's Booster season!"..... good boy...
Imagine you are at war. Your immune system is the total sum of your available troops. When you get the flu shot, your troops are sent scrambling in multiple directions after three (or four) different viruses, which may or may not be actually causing disease this year in your area of the world. Subtract those troops from your total army. ~~They're busy.
Out of what's left, some troops are sent off to fight the toxins - formaldehyde and mercury, because the flu shot triggers the toxin arm of your immune system, too. ~~Subtract those troops from your total army. They're busy.
Now... let's say while your viral troops and your toxin troops are out chasing down false flags, something else comes along that is a REAL threat, and your immune system needs to respond. Something like a bacterial infection... tonsillitis, bronchitis, strep, bacterial meningitis... You really need your troops but they aren't there because they're too busy chasing after three "hypothetical" threats of flu virus and two very real threats of toxic assault.
What happens? You get sick. You tell your doctor, "The flu shot gave me the flu" and your doctor says, "That can't happen because the flu shot is a killed virus." The flu shot (killed virus) can't give you the SAME flu virus and technically, it can't give you the flu.
What it CAN and DOES do is send your available immune resources - your troops - off in all directions chasing after false threats, leaving you more vulnerable to the real threats - like bacterial infections... and other viral infections, including enteroviruses and any of the 200+ other viral strains that cause influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) not covered in the vaccine.
Vaccines are routinely tested against each other or using the aluminum adjuvant as a "placebo." There are no studies using a true placebo in vaccine trials... at least not in the United States.
There WAS a true saline placebo used in a recent clinical trial of a flu shot in China. In that trial, the researchers found no difference between the trivalent flu shot and saline placebo when it comes to prevention of influenza. Translation: it didn't work.
What they DID find is that those who got the flu shot had a 340% increase in acute respiratory infections (ARI) that were not caused by influenza.
So... the flu shot didn't work, AND it made recipients much more likely to get sick with non-influenza respiratory infections and that effect lasted over the next NINE MONTHS.
Here is the study: [Link]
A recombinant flu shot which is a completely egg-free flu shot that is made using recombinant technology and is approved for use in people 18 years and older. This shot is made without flu viruses and contains three times the antigen than other standard-dose inactivated flu vaccines, to help create a stronger immune response.
And An egg-based live attenuated flu nasal spray vaccine made with attenuated (weakened) live flu viruses, which is approved for use in people 2 years through 49 years.
Ooopsie.....
Afluria Quadrivalent, Fluarix Quadrivalent, FluLaval Quadrivalent, Flucelvax Quadrivalent and Fluzone Quadrivalent. Plus FluMist Quadrivalent to name a few.
Actual study linked here: [Link]
'COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere' [Link]
The paper is based on 17 countries in the Southern Hemisphere and equatorial region. A definite causal link is shown between many peaks in all-cause mortality and rapid vaccine rollouts. The authors quantify the fatal toxicity risk per injection, which is exceedingly large in the most elderly.
The authors conclude that governments should immediately end the policy of prioritizing elderly people for COVID-19 injection.
It neglected to account for the fact that these spikes in excess mortality corresponded to surges of COVID-19 deaths. This means that these spikes were very likely due to COVID-19, not the vaccines.
The months used were during the times of peak covid and flu outbreaks.
Here is a lecture on nanotechnology and what it could do. [Link]
Here is how much nanotechnology is going to help society:
[Link]
.
"EAST LANSING, MI – Liberty Counsel recently helped exonerate a Michigan State University professor after he received allegations that he had used “unethical practices” during a published COVID-19 shot study. The study highlighted a correlation between the COVID shot and nearly 300,000 nationwide fatalities. The peer-reviewed journal BMC Infectious Diseases originally published the study in January 2023, but later retracted it amid the allegations. Despite the study’s retraction, it remains in the top one percent of shared research around the world..."
He wrongly assumes, like Kirsch, that all deaths reported to VAERS are confirmed vaccine-related deaths, when in fact, all they document is that a death occurred after a vaccination of some cause, which may or may not be (and probably isn’t) the vaccination.
Skidmore’s citation is to [Link] an overtly biased, anonymous WordPress blog run by ‘just a concerned citizen’ who used to design websites for pharmaceutical companies and now fancies himself a bit of a data fundi.
:
a) A paper by the discredited Dr Wakefield
b) The famous Lancet paper by Dr Wakefield which was retracted due to concerns about fraud and falsification
c) A paper on delayed reflexes in newborn primates who received the thimerosal-containing Hep B vaccine, a questionable study funded by anti-vaccine activists.
d) Papers by Dr Stephen Walker that supposedly support Dr Wakefield’s autism claims.
She also was found to:
Cherry-picking isolated statements from a range of studies that support her views but completely ignoring qualifying statements made by those authors and overall conclusions drawn in those studies.
Aiming to confuse readers by quoting 30-year-old studies on the failures of the 1963 inactivated measles vaccine (and serum gamma globulin as a form of treatment) numerous times throughout the chapter, even though both are no longer in use.
Ignoring data on counter studies and third world countries that are inconvenient to her claims.
Stripping numerous quotes off their context as an intentional means to mislead and deceive.
Vaccines are adulterated with metals to promote an immune response which is known to attack sperm quantity and quality.
So the food industry has done the same thing. I don't see people going after them.
A November study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the 10 least-vaccinated U.S. states have nearly three times more excess mortality than the 10 most vaccinated states.
The data is, in The Exposé's own words, cherry-picked, and the low number of deaths in this age group makes their explanatory power largely useless.
Trauma is defined as a serious injury to the body, as from physical violence or an accident.
I do not care to post any thing else on this site. I enjoy reading it. I hope if this continues another poster will just ctrl c ctrl v this comment.
MCsmacks
OUT