Society's ChildS


X

The other ugly secret: Some Google team managers keep employee blacklists

google
© Getty Images
Is publishing an attack on political correctness a fireable offense? Is blacklisting co-workers who disagree with you? These are the tough questions facing Google.

On Friday night, Vice's Motherboard reported that a controversial internal memo written by a concerned Google employee was going viral within the company. The memo, titled "PC Considered Harmful" and since dubbed "the Google manifesto" on social media, argued two points: First, that Google has become an ideological echo chamber where anyone with centrist or right-of-center views fears to speak his or her mind. Second, that part of the tech industry's gender gap can be attributed to biological differences between men and women.

This news caused an immediate and lasting uproar, both within Google and on public discussion forums like Twitter. The dismay and outrage -- and then the inevitable counter-outrage in response to the initial outrage -- heated up further when Gizmodo released the full text of the open letter. Critics have primarily focused on author James Damore's implication that women are less prevalent in software engineering and leadership roles because of the unequal distribution of innate characteristics like spatial reasoning and neuroticism.

Update: Damore has since been fired, Bloomberg reported.

Within Google, a few sympathetic employees were dismayed to see Damore so vehemently criticized by their colleagues. In a poll distributed on a mailing list dedicated to discussing the manifesto, opinion broke down differently than it did in non-anonymous Google Plus posts:

Comment: Dr. Jordan Peterson interviews James Damore:




Map

Preserving history: Brooklyn to keep names of Confederate generals

brooklyn
© Lucas Jackson / Reuters
The US Army has refused a call by several Congressional Democrats to remove the names of two Confederate generals from several Brooklyn streets. Lawmakers claimed that keeping the names amounted to endorsing slavery and racism.

In a letter sent to the New York congressional delegation over the weekend, the Army said it understood the concerns over General Lee Avenue and Stonewall Jackson Way in Fort Hamilton, Brooklyn, but said the names would would remain, according to WPIX-TV.

Robert E. Lee and Thomas Jackson served as US Army officers at the Brooklyn fort, before joining the Confederacy during the 1861-65 Civil War.

Removing their names would be "controversial" and contrary to the "spirit of reconciliation," Diane Randon, the Army's deputy assistant chief of staff for installation management, wrote in the letter to lawmakers. "The men in question were honored on Fort Hamilton as individuals, not as representatives of any particular cause or ideology."

Representative Yvette Clarke (D-New York), said she was disappointed with the Army's decision.

Comment: Yvette Clarke, you'd better find a better model:
stalin censorship



X

Evangelists of tolerance: Zero-tolerance policy - dissent is verboten

Big brother google
Why is it that the self-proclaimed evangelists of tolerance always seem to have a zero-tolerance policy? Tech giants that run the world's largest platforms of public discourse - Google, Facebook and Twitter - are the least likely to allow the diversity of opinion. They regularly ban content with which they disagree, promote mainstream media's #fakenews while promising to eliminate fake news, present false hierarchy of trending hashtags, prevent access to websites (sometimes millions of them), and daily silence those who don't espouse a liberal worldview. And it's not just overly-aggressive or error-prone algorithms that are to blame. Humans create those algorithms. And scores of human "content reviewers" manually remove truth, literally impacting public opinion and even elections.

This should alarm any free society.

These platforms are largely the disseminators of today's news and information, but an Orwellian sponsored form rigidly controlled by those who value (selective) Freedom from Offense more than Freedom.

Comment: The road to totalitarianism is paved with calls for tolerance. That's how ponerogenic movements roll: pseudo-moralistic hypocrisy masking pathological intolerance.


Cult

So satanic, so normal: Satanist gives opening prayer at Colorado city council

satanist council colorado
Andrew Vodopich, minister of the Church of Satan, delivers opening prayer at city council in Colorado, August 2, 2017
The anticipation of the first invocation delivered by a satanist before the Grand Junction City Council lasted much longer than the actual event, which measured about a minute. Although it drew about 50 attendees to the council chambers - including some who brought Bibles and prayed - the invocation was completed without much fanfare.

Prior to the start of the council's regular meeting Wednesday night, a group of Christians gathered in protest outside City Hall. They prayed in a circle as members of the Western Colorado Atheists and Freethinkers entered the building.

Mayor Rick Taggart introduced Scott Iles, the member of the Western Colorado Atheists and Freethinkers who had his name selected randomly to offer the invocation. Iles stepped up to the podium and introduced Andrew Vodopich and said he was a "much better public speaker" and would be offering it instead. Vodopich is a satanist who has lived in Grand Junction for almost 20 years and the atheists group had previously announced it intended to have a satanist perform the invocation.

Comment: Sure, 'we're all secular now', but isn't this a bit much?

The 'invocation' he gave is quite interesting:
"We exhort all officials and stewards of the public good, including those here tonight, to be unified in your endeavors for honesty, truth and wisdom.

We beseech all those present to shun primitive hatreds and superstition, bigotry, prejudice and atavism and instead seek equality in justice and thereby safeguard all worldviews and treat them equally and with respect.

We counsel this entire community to allow the light of truth to shine unobstructed on all matters, and to let not one coveted assumption be spared examination, to let not one archaic belief be spared disgrace, and thus leave no room for ignorance and assumption.

So say we all in the name of reason, in the name of free inquiry and in the name of rebellion against theocracy.

Hail, Satan."
It reads like a pitch-perfect account of 'Enlightenment values'.

Even the choice of the term 'invocation' appears to be deliberately ambiguous:
invocationˌɪnvə(ʊ)ˈkeɪʃ(ə)n / noun

the action of invoking someone or something

(in the Christian Church) a form of words such as 'In the name of the Father' introducing a prayer, sermon, etc.

an incantation used to invoke a deity or the supernatural
This is arguably the end-result of liberalism: everyone is free to free themselves from all bounds, thus freely giving themselves up unto boundless subjectivity.

Hail cultural relativism!


Bulb

Russian MP seeks measures to block minors' access to online porn

porn addiction
© unknown
Russian MP Vitaly Milonov, best known as the main sponsor of the ban on promoting "non-traditional" sex to minors, has asked the Communications Ministry to develop a new age verification system for internet users and ban pornography sites that refuse to use it.

"I am asking you to consider the possibility of changing the existing way of operation of all websites specializing in erotica and pornography on the territory of the Russian Federation," Milonov wrote in his letter to the ministry, quoted by RIA Novosti.

"It is necessary to introduce a ban on the work of these websites in free access mode and also to introduce an effective age verification mechanism and a ban on unrestricted advertising of such websites on the internet," he added.

The lawmaker also proposed blocking access to all free pornography sites in Russia before an effective mechanism of age verification is developed and implemented.

Comment: Limiting ease of access to children viewing pornography? What a concept!

It's too late for current generations, but it could be useful for saving future generations.

Of course, there's always the Chinese option, which seems to be working out well for them:

Porn is illegal in China (and has been since 1949)

It'll never happen in the West, of course, because 'freedom of speech', 'freedom to do what I damn well please' and similar self-centered ideological nonsense.


Brain

Porn is illegal in China (and has been since 1949)

china city
The Chinese: godless Communists, closet Christians, or...?
The Chinese government started blocking Google on some computers this week after accusing the search engine of displaying "pornographic" links. And as of July 1, all computers sold in China will have Internet filtering software installed to block porn. Is all pornography illegal in China?

Yes. The People's Republic of China has banned porn since its establishment in 1949. Anyone who produces, distributes, or purchases lewd magazines, books, or videos can be penalized. Usually the punishment is just a fine and a warning, but in 2005 the creator of China's biggest porn site was sentenced to life in prison. Movie studios or filmmakers caught producing erotic films can lose permission to make movies altogether.

It's unclear, however, what the government considers pornographic. The law itself is vague: Officials may target anything that "violat[es] public morality and harm[s] the physical and mental health of youth and young people." At universities, performance art that features nudity is rarely prohibited. (It's more likely to be banned if it involves pictures or video.) State-run bookstores will often sell books advertised as sexually explicit, but with the offending passages removed. The government makes an exception for sex education - which was taught in primary schools starting in 2002 - although teaching materials often resort to euphemism rather than pictures of naked men and women.

Comment: What this brief summary of the official status of pornography in China leaves out is cultural attitudes about it. The only way the ban has been accepted in China since 1949 is because people there largely agree with it.


Chalkboard

Prof lets students choose own grades for 'stress reduction'

campus_reform
A University of Georgia professor has adopted a "stress reduction policy" that will allow students to select their own grades if they "feel unduly stressed" by the ones they earned. According to online course syllabi for two of Dr. Richard Watson's fall business courses, he has introduced the policy because "emotional reactions to stressful situations can have profound consequences for all involved."

As such, if students feel "unduly stressed by a grade for any assessable material or the overall course," they can "email the instructor indicating what grade [they] think is appropriate, and it will be so changed" with "no explanation" being required.

Heart - Black

Cops repeatedly tase handcuffed teen for sleeping in truck

police tasing
The family of a teenager who was viciously assaulted for sleeping in his truck has filed a formal complaint against the Cherokee County Police Department after a disturbing video shows their handcuffed son being tortured by police with a taser.

"Please, please, I can't breathe," screamed Daniel Fruhling as Cherokee County Police Officers knelt on his back and repeatedly tasered him while he was face down and handcuffed.

Fruhling, 19, was found asleep in his pickup truck at 8 a.m. on August 1 by a woman who tried to wake him up. After being unsuccessful in her attempt to wake the teen, the woman called 911 for medical help. Instead of medical help, however, Fruhling quickly found himself on the receiving end of baton blows and 50,000-volt taser strikes.

"When the video first starts, the first thing you hear is the sound of taser...you've got a small young kid face down on the ground with handcuffs on his back with two Cherokee County Sheriff's deputies on his back...and you hear, 'Please, please, I can't breathe,'" attorney Kyle Koester described to CBS46 while watching the video.

While the video doesn't capture the first part of the interaction, according to the police report - if we are to trust it - Fruhling would not get out of his truck, most likely because he was still passed out.

Sheriff

'Are you recording me?': Cop gets suspended for attempting to take a man's camera

Cpl. Scott Wolford
Cpl. Scott Wolford
Even though a young Texan named Phillip Turner won a lawsuit at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, setting a precedent for Americans to record their interactions with police, some clueless officers simply don't get it.

Anne Arundel County police officer Cpl. Scott Wolford is one such cop. He was caught on camera attempting to take a video camera from a citizen and just got suspended as a result.

Officer Wolford responded to a business dispute whereby a man was claiming a homeowner did not have the right to put his hands on him. The homeowner was accused of pushing the man out of his home. Wolford responded to the call for police intervention and began to explain to the man that the homeowner was within his rights to remove the man from his premises.

Neither the man who was complaining, nor the other gentleman who was recording were at all angry or disrupting the peace, but the presence of the camera was enough to set Wolford off.

Attention

Terror scare in Brussels after 'mentally unstable' man claims to possess explosives

Belgian police officers
© Eric Vidal / ReutersBelgian police officers
Police kept part of the Molenbeek district of Brussels sealed off for several hours after they shot at a vehicle and detained the driver who claimed there were explosives in the car. No explosives were found eventually.

Earlier police in the Molenbeek district of Brussels shot at a vehicle they were chasing and said the driver claimed there were explosives in the car, according to Belgium's federal prosecutor.

It's now been confirmed the suspect was unarmed and "mentally unstable."