Society's ChildS


Bullseye

Whistleblowers and journalists decry flimsy US Assange charges: '5 years for ATTEMPT to crack a password?' - no chance for fair trial

assange protest sign free press
© Agence France-Presse / Daniel Leal-Olivas
Journalists and whistleblowers have weighed in on the indictment brought by the US against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, calling the current password-cracking charge "weak," but setting a dangerous precedent for press freedom.

A statement from the Department of Justice on Wednesday said Assange had been charged for engaging in a conspiracy to crack a password on a Department of Defense computer in order to release classified information. If found guilty, he could face up to five years in prison.

Fellow whistleblower and former CIA employee Edward Snowden said on Twitter that the "weakness of the US charge against Assange is shocking" in that the allegation that Assange and Manning had "tried" to crack the password had been public knowledge for "nearly a decade," and that the Obama administration's DOJ had concluded that prosecuting Assange would pose a threat to press freedom.

Comment: The hope of a fair trial is nil according to CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou. He should know:
Kiriakou was the first person to be sentenced in the US for leaking classified material to a journalist as part of President Barack Obama's crackdown on whistleblowers. His case was heard by the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He took a plea bargain in October 2012 and was sentenced to 30 months in prison.

The same court is handling the case against Julian Assange, who is alleged to have conspired with WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning as part of her leaking the damning classified materials. Assange was arrested by the UK authorities on Thursday after Ecuador allowed British police into its embassy in London to drag the whistleblower out.

Kiriakou believes that once in US custody, Assange would face additional charges and may spend the rest of his life in jail.


"I think that there are many more charges to be considered for Julian. I would expect a superseding indictment, possibly to include espionage charges," he told RT.
I don't think Julian is looking at five years in prison. He is probably looking at 50 years in prison.

The US court that would try Assange will not give him a fair trial, Kiriakou believes. "They don't call EDVA the 'Espionage Court' for nothing," he tweeted earlier in the day. He told RT he was speaking from his personal experience.
"Judge Leonie Brinkema is a Reagan appointee to the federal bench and she was promoted to District Court bench by Bill Clinton in the mid-1990s. She reserves all national security cases for herself. She handled my case, the Jeffrey Sterling case [over leaking details of a CIA op to journalist James Risen], she is Julian's judge, she has reserved the [NSA whistleblower] Ed Snowden case for herself."

"No national security defendant has ever won a case in the EDVA. In my case, I asked Judge Brinkema to declassify 70 documents that I needed to defend myself. She denied all 70 documents. And so I had literally no defense for myself and was forced to take a plea."
Kiriakou said he hopes that the way Assange is being treated by the US justice will galvanize the US public and result in more documents being leaked to expose the misdeeds of the US government.
[The prosecution of Assange] was only theoretical until this morning. Now it is a reality that we have to face. This is an assault on our civil liberties here in the United States. It's an assault on our constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of the press and freedom of speech.
Critics of the US case against Assange, like Kiriakou, say all he has been doing was publishing material of public interest, which was also embarrassing to the US government. This is exactly what journalists in the US have been doing before him when they reported major scandals in cases like Watergate, Pentagon Papers or Iran-Contra.

"If Julian Assange as publisher and journalist is prosecuted, then there is literally nothing to stop the government from prosecuting journalists at the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times and anywhere else," he warned.



Handcuffs

Resistance hero Michael Avenatti to be indicted on 36 counts, including fraud, perjury, tax-evasion, and embezzlement

avenatti nike extortion
© Stephanie Keith/Getty ImagesMichael Avenatti speaks to the media after being arrested for allegedly trying to extort Nike for $15-$25 million on March 25, 2019 in New York City.
A federal grand jury has brought a 36-count indictment against celebrity attorney Michael Avenatti, charging him with embezzlement, fraud, perjury, and more.

The Los Angeles Times reported Thursday morning that charges stem from Avenatti's dealings with multiple clients, including Geoffrey Ernest Johnson, who is mentally ill and a paraplegic. Johnson won a $4 million settlement from Los Angeles County, but Avenatti hid the money from him for years. He allegedly also hid $2.75 million from another client. The day after he received that money, he allegedly purchased a $2.5 million private jet for a company he owned. The jet has since been seized by federal agents

"Avenatti stole millions of dollars from five clients and used a tangled web of shell companies and bank accounts to cover up the theft, the Santa Ana grand jury alleged in an indictment that prosecutors will make public Thursday," the Times reported.

Attention

Wikileaks editor warns Assange arrest portends future danger to journalists

WikiLeaks službeno postaje ”nedržavna neprijateljska služba”
'No journalist will be safe from extradition to the US for doing his job'

WikiLeaks editor Kristinn Hrafnsson has said that Julian Assange is facing "political persecution" for "doing his job as a journalist," and vowed to fight his extradition to the US.

Speaking to reporters outside Westminster Magistrates Court, Hrafnsson said that Assange's removal from the Ecuadorian embassy - where he had been seeking asylum for almost seven years - "sets a horrible precedent."

"A journalist is facing political persecution for doing journalism," Hrafnsson added. "If this goes forward, no journalist anywhere in the world will be safe from extradition to the United States for doing his job."

Comment: Comment: The mainstream media shows its true allegiance as independent journalists speak out:
The arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, is a severe blow to press freedom, but the mainstream media has no objections, despite never shying away from writing articles based on his publications, analysts told RT.

"What we're seeing right now is criminalization of journalism; the criminalization of publishing," analyst Patrick Henningsen said hours after the UK police forcibly removed Assange out of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

This "very unfortunate" development affects each and every journalist, but the "supine mainstream media isn't protesting what's going on," he added. The leading Western outlets are "in lockstep with the government of the US, the UK, Spain and others" and just don't see Assange as their colleague.
assange arrest reporters
© Reuters / Henry NichollsMembers of the media are reflected in a window of a police van as WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is seen inside, after he was arrested in London.
There's "no viable Fourth Estate" anymore, only the "government media complex," Henningsen said.

That aside, Julian Assange has been "a modern Robin Hood for independent journalists. Everybody used what he revealed on [Hillary] Clinton; on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan," independent journalist Luc Rivet told RT.

And the MSM also heavily relied on the work done by the WikiLeaks, human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell explains. "Assange didn't leak anything," but only made documents, obtained by Chelsea Manning, available to the public. He's "a publisher in the same way that the New York Times and the Guardian that also published the leaks of Chelsea Manning," Tatchell said.

The fact that it's only Assange, who is being persecuted by the US, but not those outlets, "smacks of double standards. It smacks of a vendetta," the activist pointed out.
The reason the US authorities are going after him isn't because he caused any damage per say, but because he caused huge embarrassment exposing American wrongdoing around the world.
Henningsen stressed that nowadays "things only become protest-worthy if the mainstream media is giving it coverage," so Assange's arrest won't lead to large-scale rallies, adding that only concerned activists will take to the streets.

He expressed the belief that Ecuador, which sheltered Assange for more than six years, withdrew the publisher's asylum claim as a result of "backroom deal that's been done between the Ecuadorian, British and the US governments."

Assange will most likely be extradited to the US where and the "danger is that Julian Assange will not face justice," but only "a facade of due process," he said.

"What's he's going to face is secret grand jury proceedings, most likely in northeastern Virginia, most likely it'll be ruled on by the judge, who has ruled against every single whistleblower under the Obama administration, including Thomas Drake, John Kiriakou and many others."



Handcuffs

U.S. investor Michael Calvey released, put under house arrest in Moscow

Michael Calvey
U.S. investor Michael Calvey attends a court hearing in Moscow on April 11.
A Moscow court has ordered that U.S. investor Michael Calvey, whose detention stunned the business community in Moscow and clouded the investment climate, be released from pretrial detention and placed under house arrest instead.

The Basmanny district court's April 11 decision came a day after Russia's Investigative Committee called for Calvey's release. Calvey left the court shortly after the ruling.

Kristina Panshina, a spokeswoman for the Federal Penitentiary Service, said that Calvey will be wearing an electronic bracelet while under house arrest.

The court later said the Investigative Committee has asked it to keep Calvey under house arrest until July 14.

Star of David

Airbnb buckles under lawsuits: Backs down from blacklisting Jewish homes in the West Bank

illegal jewish settlements west bank
© ReutersAirbnb has reversed its decision to remove rental listings of Jewish settler homes in West Bank (pictured, some of the properties in Beitar Illit), which the UN has declared to be illegal under international law
Airbnb has reversed its decision to remove rental listings of properties in Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian territory.

The home rental company announced on Tuesday it will back off a plan to remove Jewish settler homes in West Bank, which the UN has declared to be illegal under international law, to end lawsuits brought by hosts.

In November, Airbnb sparked outrage when it said it was removing around 200 homes 'that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians'.

Israeli lawyers immediately filed a class action suit against the the San Francisco-based firm.

Airbnb's announcement came after it was forced to settle in four lawsuits filed against it in the US and Israel.

Comment:


Bad Guys

Eighteen states offer in-state tuition for illegals, legal resident students NOT happy about that

states tuition illegal immigrants
© Campus Reform
The Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that colleges in Georgia are not required to admit illegal immigrant students.

The decision further sparked a national conversation about the rights of Dreamers, as well as the legality of offering them in-state tuition benefits, which usually allow students attending college in their home states to pay far less than their peers from different states.

Citing US Code 1623, which states that anyone who is not legally a citizen cannot be entitled to any benefit that is denied to a citizen of the United States, some have questioned whether those here illegally should be offered in-state tuition rates that aren't available to other students who are citizens. Currently, 18 states, offer some form of a pathway for in-state tuition to those living here illegally.

Bullseye

A high school student speaks out on feminism

feminists
© YouTube
Today's feminism has lost its way. In the late 1800s, "first wave" feminism rightfully started out as a movement to establish, first and foremost, suffrage for women (i.e., the right for women to vote). From there, it then quickly evolved into a movement that focused on gaining women equal opportunity in the workplace and equality in the eyes of the law. Through the 1960s, "second wave" feminism sought an end to sexual harassment and fought against discrimination.

All of these were worthy goals and, to a large extent, have successfully been accomplished. However, feminism today-"third wave" feminism-has morphed into a shrill, self-righteous crusade that, in what seems like a desperate bid to remain relevant, has not just vilified men but has turned on children, families and even women themselves.

Modern feminism has set out to infiltrate family life, destroying it with poisonous lies through the cultivation of a "culture of grievance" in which women are always to be seen as victims. It has done this by promoting the ideological falsehood that men and women are not natural allies, but that their relationship is adversarial in nature. Feminism strives to pit women against men at every opportunity.

Because of this, men are not allowed to speak on any issue concerning women, from the supposed "pay gap" to abortion to even the difficulties men face simply being men. The new anti-men hashtags coined by modern feminists - #killallmen or #menstears to name a couple - show how feminism has allowed itself to become synonymous with misandry. Delivering generalizations on the back of slogans is, as Chairman Mao proved, a powerful way of thought control. It allows the idea to form that all men are inherently bad while overlooking the fact that there are also bad women.

Comment: When one peels away the layers what feminism's real effect on society is, we can see it all but helpful to women and harmful to our social structures. In fact, the core of feminism is based on the destruction of the family and by extension, Western society. See also:


Briefcase

Shareholders of Boeing to sue over 737 MAX crashes, disclosures

Boeing
Boeing Co's legal troubles grew on Tuesday as a new lawsuit accused the company of defrauding shareholders by concealing safety deficiencies in its 737 MAX planes before two fatal crashes led to their worldwide grounding.

The proposed class action filed in Chicago federal court seeks damages for alleged securities fraud violations, after Boeing's market value tumbled by $34 billion within two weeks of the March 10 crash of an Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX.

Chief Executive Dennis Muilenburg and Chief Financial Officer Gregory Smith were also named as defendants.

Boeing spokesman Charles Bickers had no immediate comment.

Comment: Now if only the American public would sue Boeing - and many of the companies comprising of the military industrial complex - for helping to induce the horrific global wars that the US government wages in order to make those ungodly profits for them.


Pumpkin 2

Revenge plot: Deputy arrested for planting drugs in car of ex-girlfriend's new boyfriend

deputy arrested
North Carolina sheriff's deputy is accused of planting drugs in someone's vehicle as part of a revenge plot.

Anson County Sheriff Landric Reid said he's grateful his detectives were able to uncover the alleged scheme before anyone's life was ruined.

"This was a revenge case where he planted drugs in this male's car," Reid said. "This male was dating his ex, and he wanted revenge, and he wanted his ex-girlfriend back."

Reid said that in March of 2018, former Deputy David Scott Burroughs bought drugs, such as heroin and meth, and planted them in the car.

Biohazard

Fukushima disaster: Ghost town residents free to return, Greenpeace warns radiation levels remain too high

Fukushima
Tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is illuminated for a decommissioning operation
A town of 10,000 was evacuated in the aftermath of the nuclear meltdown - eight years later, residents are free to return.

For the first time since the 2011 meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, residents who lived in a nearby town are being allowed back in.

Japanese authorities on Wednesday gave the first clearance for residents to return to the evacuated town of Okuma, west of the tsunami-crippled plant.

Lower radiation levels achieved through decontamination work and progress in infrastructure development allowed authorities to lift the mandatory evacuation order over parts of the town, Japan Times reported.