OF THE
TIMES
According to our information, they [Turkish forces] are digging in a few hundred meters from the border inside Syria.Though Erdogan's own generals have strongly advised against an all-out invasion of Syria, knowing the grave consequences for Turkey and its military would be catastrophic against the Russian coalition's superior air and firepower, in the face of recent decisive victories achieved against Turkey's proxy allies the ISIS and al Nusra terrorists, debate over whether Erdogan will actually bully his armed forces into launching a ground war invasion into Syria has been heavily speculated by both Turkish and Middle East press. In February Turkey and Saudi Arabia's most powerful leaders were publicly announcing to the world their intention to invade Syria in a protracted ground war risking World War III. Saudi jets were even deployed to Turkey's Incirlik Air Base.
"I consider the objectives that have been set for the Defense Ministry to be generally accomplished. That is why I order to start withdrawal of the main part of our military group from the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic starting from tomorrow," Putin said on Monday during a meeting with Shoigu and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.The first question which needs to be asked is whether this is correct: have the Russians achieved their objective or not? To answer this question, we need to look at what the initial Russian objectives were. I did that in my article "Week Thirteen of the Russian Intervention in Syria: debunking the lies" where I wrote: (emphasis added)
"In a short period of time Russia has created a small but very effective military group in Syria. The effective work of our military forces allowed the peace process to begin," Putin said, adding that "Russian government troops and [Syria's] patriotic forces have changed the situation in the fight with international terrorism and have ceased the initiative."
The key issue here is what criteria to use to measure "success". And that, in turns, begs the question of what the Russians had hoped to achieve with their intervention in the first place. It turns out that Putin clearly and officially spelled out what the purpose of the Russian intervention was. On October 11th, he declared the following in an interview with Vladimir Soloviev on the TV channel Russia 1:
Our objective is to stabilize the legitimate authority and create conditions for a political compromise
The email asks for a donation of $3 to continue the campaign against Trump."Last night, without consulting local police, Donald Trump abruptly cancelled a rally in Chicago in the face of massive and overwhelmingly peaceful student-led protests," an email to MoveOn.org members stated. "We're being flooded with aggressive emails and social media posts from Trump supporters. Some of them are threatening. We refuse to be intimidated by Donald Trump, Fox News, or anyone else..."
"So here's the plan: We'll support MoveOn.org members to call out and nonviolently protest Trump's racist, bigoted, misogynistic, xenophobic, and violent behavior — and show the world that America rejects Trump's hate. And to keep it going, we're counting on you to donate whatever you can to cover the costs of everything involved — the organizers, signs, online recruitment ads, training, and more."
Al-Jarida is seen as tightly linked with Netanyahu's close associates. Since Netanyahu's return to the Israeli government in the spring of 2009, his colleagues allegedly have, on occasion, used the Kuwaiti paper to leak information without leaving footprints.So the timeline is: Israelis tell a story to Al Jarida they want published. Then Jerusalem Post picks up the story as having originated in Kuwait rather than Israel.
Many in Israel and the West view leaks in Al-Jarida as originating Israeli sources, which tends to increase their credibility.
Comment: This bad idea of asset privatization is not going well. The vulture capitalists are probably waiting for even deeper discounts.