By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In '78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism - in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.General Odom is absolutely is absolutely right ...
(audio here).
And because the U.S. itself uses terrorism, it's very hesitant to get others in trouble for using terrorism.
And that's why Congress is refusing to pass a bill agreeing to stop funding terrorists. Specifically, Senator Rand Paul and Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard introduced bills to whose simple name accurately describes what they want: The "Stop Arming Terrorists Act".
But neither bill looks like it has any chance of being passed right now: How pathetic is that?













Comment: The reason the US will remain in Syria indefinitely has nothing to do with ISIS, just like its purpose in staying in Iraq and Afghanistan has nothing to do with terrorists. This is about creating vassal states in areas of geopolitical strategic importance. The US just uses terrorists as an excuse to illegally invade and occupy countries that they wish to control. It will attempt to do the same thing in Syria, but unlike Iraq or Afghanistan that's going to fail spectacularly with the presence of the Russian military in Syria.