The decision to commission the research shows how seriously the couple is taking their legal battle — a rare move for a sitting head of state to take against an online influencer, according to Financial Times.
The probe, which was carried out by Manhattan-based Nardello & Co., compiled information about Owens' political ties and public statements, according to details shared with the FT.
Investigators documented her connections to far-right figures in France, Britain and the US along with examples of her coverage in Russian state-run media.
Dan Nardello, the firm's executive chair and a former New York federal prosecutor, told FT that the Macrons "brought this lawsuit with the full knowledge of who Owens is aligned with."
At the center of the dispute is Owens' podcast series "Becoming Brigitte," which attracted millions of listeners and pushed the claim that France's first lady was born male.
The Macrons' suit, filed last month in Delaware, calls the allegations "outlandish, defamatory and far-fetched fictions."
Their attorney, Tom Clare of defamation law firm Clare Locke, told the FT that part of the reason for hiring investigators was to understand why a conservative commentator had targeted the couple and to provide jurors with context about the source of the claims.
Owens has dismissed the lawsuit as an overreaction.
"We were engaged to provide factual support to the Macron's defamation claims," a spokesperson for Nardello & Co. told The Post.
"In the course of our investigation, we documented Owens' multitude of defamatory statements. Further, we uncovered her ties to the far right in France and elsewhere. Our work is ongoing."
The Post has sought comment from the Macrons' attorneys.
The investigators reviewed Owens' shift in political identity, noting she began her career identifying as a liberal but later became a staunch supporter of Donald Trump before publicly breaking with him.
They also traced the origins of the rumor about Brigitte Macron to a Spanish blogger in 2017. The theory began to gain traction in France in 2021 and was later promoted by Xavier Poussard, former editor of a fringe far-right publication.
In 2024, Poussard said he translated his work into English and sent it to Owens and others in Trump's orbit.
He claimed Owens knew nothing of the allegation until shortly before she took it up, adding that her involvement gave the story "a real boost from the Trump entourage."
Owens' first reference to the rumor came in March 2024, when she cited a Daily Mail article that had attempted to debunk it.
She later interviewed Poussard at length on her show, portraying him as a truth-teller silenced by the Macrons. Once her series was released, Russian state-controlled media outlets, including Tsargrad — led by Vladimir Putin ally Konstantin Malofeev — began reporting on it.
Investigators found that Russia's RT network has posted about Owens more than 30 times since 2018.
While researchers did not find evidence Owens had direct ties to Russian officials or business figures, they did note her repeated online interactions with Alexander Dugin, a Russian nationalist and political theorist, with each sharing the other's posts multiple times.
Comment: Oh no, Candace talked to a famous Russian person who is merely a public figure, not a Russian gov't official. She must be a Russian agent!
The report also detailed her links to French far-right politician Marion Maréchal, who now belongs to a rival far-right party after leaving her aunt Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National.
Owens was the headline speaker at the 2019 Convention de la Droite conference in Paris, organized by nationalist groups close to Maréchal, who also addressed the gathering. The two have referenced each other in social media posts.
Comment: That was 6 years ago NY Post. Pretty weak.
Investigators also catalogued Owens' public criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, including insults calling him a "sociopathic murdering welfare queen" and "the neighborhood crackhead."
Comment: Both "insults" look to be pretty true statements.
They noted her connections to other high-profile figures on the right, including Reform UK leader Nigel Farage — reportedly a guest at her wedding to former Parler chief executive George Farmer — as well as broadcaster Tucker Carlson and online personalities Andrew and Tristan Tate.
In their lawsuit, the Macrons accuse Owens of spreading falsehoods, specifically the claim that Brigitte Macron was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux. Clare said the French president and first lady are prepared to appear in person at the Delaware trial.
"When it comes to Brigitte Macron, abusing Emmanuel and then blaming it on Russia is an unfortunate and sinister pattern," Owens said in a statement in response to the FT report.
"The world recently watched as Brigitte physically assaulted Emmanuel, and the Elysees Palace at first denied the televised assault, blaming it on Russian disinformation."
Owens said that the strategy is "psychological gaslighting" and that the French first lady "has once again been caught."
"Between lawyers, international PR teams, plus investigators, the couple is spending real money to quiet the paranoia of her past," Owens said.
Owens said Brigitte Macron "is displaying attributes of mental illness, which severely undermines the office her husband holds."
"Everyone worldwide should pray for President Macron," the podcaster said, adding that the French leader "is a lifelong victim of this madness and has never held the power in his relationship to make it stop."




Reader Comments
Lets have some discovery - shall we?
Moreover - the impetus is upon those who filed the charge in court of Delaware in the US in claiming defamation - is it not?
So what exactly is being " defamed " - is the wife of the "President" of France - a man or a women? Is that what is being challenged - and if so, seems it would be easily proven one way or the other - and then let the facts speak for themselves.
Simple.
Otherwise - tis just "he said she said" bs and the lawyers truly cannot solve that - but the facts easily proven can.
So - what is the holdup - if the wife is PROVEN women as claimed, then get ready to payup Candice - in the absence of that - get ready for a counter suit I reckon.
And meanwhile - might be worth doing some easy studying regarding the law firm hired in this case by the President and said partner of France - what a joke really it all is - kabuki no doubt.
But still - the law firm "Clare Locke" - lets do a quick "ai search" shall we - this is "off the cuff" and only done as a member of society interested about these going on's and what they mean for lawfare in the modern age:
~
oh boy - there is "Dominion" voting machines again - is that coincidence?
Then - proof is proof.
Simple and easily proven - and at some moment in time - the interest of the many impacted and affected by the effects of this lack of transparency in our FACES far outweighs the interest of one individual's privacy - particularly if said individual in a known entity in the "public eye" whose actions and choices affect many with harmful effects. Lets have some discovery - transparently - and then - let the chips fall where they will.
The truth always prevails!
Is a truism - or if not - then extinction is no doubt.
Cause one lie too much is one lie too many and the camel's back is more than broken.
~
Show your goods - and if you are a proven liar - then pay the price - cause much harm has been caused and this demands Justice - justice can be most harsh and ruthless - so show the goods - and lets put the speculation to rest - do it.
If you refuse - you must think you are the "most special" and exceptional one in the whole wide "community" - and let me inform you - you are mistaken - tis quite the contrary - and really - some of us are sick and effing tired of one lie after another - and tis time to shed some light upon it - agree or not?
Macron is an obvious case. Michael Obama fooled most of us as did Barack as a USA born black man. The key element is deception, and it has worked until the last decade.
Oh those poor macaroons. How nice of the NY post to paint a lovely picture of those poor insulted French couple, while lambasting an American reporter.
Hope the 2 frogs show up in court. First question I'd ask them. Lift your skirt, you ol'....
I'm gonna post a link soon in one of the applicable comment sections, some here might find interesting, some not. Even if you don't like the subject matter per say, the conversation with AI, is enlightening.
We all here definitely have an awareness that most do not.
they telegraph what they want the goy to support.
so why the over the top propaganda in this piece?
Quote: Frank Zappa
But - evidence is evidence - show us what you got down below honey - and lets bring this foolishness to an END.
Otherwise - the evidence is overwhelming and there has been no defamation other than the fact you be hiding under a skirt.
~~~~~~
DISCOVERY please - ruthlessly - ruthless discovery - and during the "counter-sue" that may not be optional - cause when you get hauled off to jail - the truth is often revealed - and you got no choice in the matter!
"In our nation, where women are women, and men are women too".